1 / 35

Betsy Barton Center for Cosmology University of California, Irvine

The Birth and Assembly of Galaxies: the Relationship Between Science Capabilities and Telescope Aperture. Betsy Barton Center for Cosmology University of California, Irvine. Grateful acknowledgements to:.

Download Presentation

Betsy Barton Center for Cosmology University of California, Irvine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Birth and Assembly of Galaxies: the Relationship Between Science Capabilities and Telescope Aperture Betsy Barton Center for Cosmology University of California, Irvine Grateful acknowledgements to: J.-D. Smith,Casey Papovich, Romeel Davé, Jean Brodie, Bev Oke, Brad Whitmore, Rob Kennicutt

  2. Galaxy formation and evolution How did galaxies like the Milky Way form? • Using the early universe to “see” it happening M31 (http://zebu.uoregon.edu/images)

  3. Galaxy evolution • When and how did the build-up of galaxies occur? • Internal variations in kinematics, metallicity, star formation history to z~5 (and beyond) • Where and when did the first stars form? • When did “first light” happen? • When and how was the universe reionized? • Can we find Pop III star formation?

  4. Detailed internal properties of high-redshift galaxies • Science goals: • Dynamical masses • Enrichment and star formation history as a function of position • Direct observations of the build-up of mass through merging (z=3 galaxy from Hubble Deep Field; HST psf ~ 0.1” ~ 770 pc)

  5. Near-IR case: for chemical abundances, star formation histories weak absorption Lines in the optical and near-infrared [OII] to z > 5 Ha to z = 3 L/M optical • Few strong lines in optical • between redshifts of • about 1 to 3 • NEED near-IR K H J Plot from Oke & Barton (2000)

  6. Unresolved line flux sensitivity estimates (10,000 seconds, high-order AO, R=3000)

  7. Kinematics of Lyman break galaxies • At R < 25, ~3-4 LBGs per square arcminute at 2.5 < z < 3.5; ~1 at z > 3.5

  8. High-mass mergers are frequent at high redshift 2-2.4 m is z ~ 1 Plot by Joel Berrier; Models in Berrier et al. (2005); Zentner et al. 2004

  9. Galaxy evolution at very high redshifts: watching merging in action • The Antennae simulation: a luminous, lumpy local starburst 8-meter 20-meter 30-meter 8 hours sec. with large- aperture telescope, z=4.74 Individual star-forming regions are visible in emission lines at high redshifts with large-aperture telescopes

  10. Galaxy evolution at very high redshifts: watching merging in action • The Antennae simulation: a luminous, lumpy local starburst 30-meter 50-meter 100-meter 8 hours sec. with large- aperture telescope, z=4.74 Individual star-forming regions are visible in emission lines at high redshifts with large-aperture telescopes

  11. Cluster detections throughout K 20-meter 30-meter

  12. Cluster detections throughout K 50-meter 100-meter

  13. Can we use the clusters to measure, say, a velocity dispersion? 30-meter 100-meter

  14. A 20-meter isn’t big enough at z~5

  15. z~5 Antennae star cluster velocity dispersion measurements

  16. z~3 (H-band) is a better regime for a 20-m z=3.34 z=4.74 (However, H-band not as open w.r.t. night-sky lines.)

  17. Role of Adaptive Optics • Diffraction limit at 1.2 microns: (arcsec) z=3 z=5 z=7

  18. Hints of internal structure at high redshift HST/WFPC2 HST/NICMOS colors color/age variation inside high-z galaxies Figure from Casey Papovich

  19. Summary of High-z Galaxy Internal Emission-line Measurements • If forming star clusters ubiquitous, like Antennae, then 30-meter can measure kinematics (and SFR) to z~5. • Main gain of > 30-meter is in coverage throughout redshift range (limited utility). • Beyond K-band (z=5.4), a mid-IR optimized 100-meter might be able to follow [OII] to higher redshifts; greatly depends on thermal properties of telescope. • Improvement may come from continuum sensitivity (light bucket). • High-order AO of limited for D > 50 meters; only unresolved objects are small star clusters (and individual stars, SN, etc.).

  20. First Light • Hydrodynamic simulations of Davé, Katz, & Weinberg • Lyman  cooling radiation (green) • Light in Ly from forming stars (red, yellow) z=10 z=8 z=6

  21. Diffraction Limits • Diffraction limit at Lyman : z=7

  22. Bright star-forming regions • 30 Dor (LMC): even central region resolved for D > 30 • Really only compact star clusters that remain unresolved 60 pc

  23. Le Delliou et al. Lyman  source sizesfrom a semi-analytic model All but 8-meter resolve almost all predicted galaxies from Le Delliou et al. (2005) at diffraction limit. z=7 8-meter (Hydro simulations don’t resolve.) 20-meter 30-meter 50-meter 100-meter: -1.74

  24. Physical elements of star formation beyond reionization star formation rate partially neutral IGM (above z ~ 6.2) stellar initial mass function { { escape of ionizing and Lya photons penetration through intergalactic medium

  25. The IMF, the ISM, and the IGM Recent theoretical work favorable to Lya detection: • IMF: low-metallicity gas leads to top-heavy IMF • Abel et al. (2000)[how fast do you enrich?] • Top-heavy to explain WMAP results (e.g., Cen 2003a,b) • IGM: Ly can escape if bubble of IGM ionized locally; winds help (Haiman 2002; Santos 2003) • ISM: fesc high for WMAP(Cen 2003a,b) • good for ionizing IGM locally • lower fraction good for number of photons converted to Lya [peak ~ fesc = 0.1-0.8 from Santos (2003)]

  26. Two favorable scenarios • “optimistic”: • Top-heavy IMF with only 300-1000 solar mass stars • no metals • fesc=0.35 (fraction of ionizing photons that escape from the galaxy; Ly flux is proportional to 1-fesc) • no dust • fIGM = 1 (fraction of Ly photons that hit the IGM and still get to us)

  27. Two favorable scenarios • “plausible”: • Top-heavy IMF with Salpeter slope but only 50-500 solar mass stars • no metals • fesc=0.1 (fraction of ionizing photons that escape from the galaxy; Lya flux is proportional to 1-fesc) • no dust • fIGM = 0.25 (fraction of Lya photons that hit the IGM and still get to us) • “heavy Salpeter”/”Salpeter”: • Same as “plausible” but over 1-500 or 1-100 solar masses

  28. Lyman  Luminosity Function 8m 30+ hrs Models: Barton et al. (2004) Data: various sources compiled in Santos et al. (2004)

  29. Simulation: heavy Salpeter IMF Adapted models from Barton et al. (2004) z=8.227 8 hours 100-m telescope

  30. Simulation: Salpeter IMF Adapted models from Barton et al. (2004) z=8.227 8 hours 100-m telescope

  31. Simulation: Salpeter IMF Adapted models from Barton et al. (2004) z=8.227 8 hours 50-m telescope

  32. Simulation: Salpeter IMF Adapted models from Barton et al. (2004) z=8.227 8 hours 30-m telescope

  33. Weighing z=10 stars HeII (1640 Å) Salpeter 1-500 M Zero metallicity HeII (1640 Å) Heavy stars Simulation through 30m telescope, 8 hours, R=3000

  34. First Light in the Near IR • Discovery of z > 7 objects: probably done with JWST • Larger ground-based telescopes will • Map reionization in Lyman  • Measure Lyman  line profiles • Look for HeII(1640) as indicator of Pop III star formation • Advantages for > 30-meter aperture: • Needed sensitivity when IGM nearly impenetrable (completely unknown; penetration is the interesting quantity for topology of reionization) • Needed sensitivity when HeII weak (but this is not Pop III anyway)

  35. What is beyond a 30-meter telescope? • Older or lower-surface-brightness stars and star formation at z > 2; dwarf galaxies at z > 2 • Faint emission lines and absorption lines at z > 5-6; lines in the mid-IR • Extremely high-z star formation with normal IMF (if it exists) • Upcoming WMAP data release may tell us how high we have to go in z These are issues for “down the road”; a 30-m can address many of the questions we have now.

More Related