1 / 12

Evolution of Beam-Beam-Background Simulation at CLIC

Evolution of Beam-Beam-Background Simulation at CLIC. André Sailer(PH-LCD) May 12,2010. Content. Beam-Beam Simulation with GuineaPig Simulation and Background in the Full Detector. Simulation with GuineaPig (GP). Initial distribution of Particles (bunch shape, charge density)

jasia
Download Presentation

Evolution of Beam-Beam-Background Simulation at CLIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evolution of Beam-Beam-Background Simulation at CLIC André Sailer(PH-LCD) May 12,2010

  2. Content • Beam-Beam Simulation with GuineaPig • Simulation and Background in the Full Detector

  3. Simulation with GuineaPig(GP) • Initial distribution of Particles (bunch shape, charge density) • Largest impact on number of pairs • Provided by Beam Physics Group (B.Dalena, D.Schulte) • Two data sets, different horizontal emmitance

  4. Incoherent Pairs from GP • Wider beam, less particles (350k  310k) • But energy distribution per angle very similar

  5. Detector Simulation • Using Geant4 based Mokka • Based on ILD concept • Different • Crossing angle • Magnetic field (4 Tesla) • Beam pipes • Calorimeters

  6. Vertex Detector • CLIC01_ILD • Vertex Detector • 3 double Layers at R=31/46/60mm • All layers 25cm long • 50 µm Active Silicon • Threshold: 3.4 keV • 4 Tesla Magnetic Field • Hadronic Calorimeter • 8.5λ • Absorber: Tungsten, 1cm thick, 77 layers Vertex Detector André Sailer, LC Physics/Detector Meeting

  7. Forward Region • First Simulations done with geometry right bottom • Different magnetic Field options • AntiDID, Solenoid, DID only • Hits in VXD (all Layers) (10BX) • 19000 71000 33000

  8. Changes I • AntiDID not an option, because it costs to much Luminosity, from now on only Solenoid field • Using “real” CLIC QD0 • Hits in the Vertex Detector (all layers, 10BX) • 70k down to 60k

  9. Changes II • Larger inner radius for BeamCal • 20 to 25 mm • Beam pipe with a single radius • Hits in the VXD increases (all Layers, 10BX) • From 60k to 93k

  10. Changes III • Using Racetrack profile • Not an option, because of QD0 design • Reduces number of backscatters from beam pipes • Hits in VXD (all Layers, 10BX) • From 93k to 41k

  11. Changes IV • Conical beam pipe that fits with QD0 design • Hits reduced again • 41k to 21k

  12. Changes V • Moved BeamCal forward, decreased inner radius • Space for Intra-Train-Feedback • Hits: • 21k to 27k • Same geometry new Beam Profiles • Hits 24k

More Related