Return of separeted and unaccompanied children to institutional reception or family
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

Return of separeted and unaccompanied children to institutional reception or family PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 51 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Return of separeted and unaccompanied children to institutional reception or family. T he current state of affairs The perspective of states The perspective of children Return to family Return to institutional reception UNICEF approach Recommendations. Current state.

Download Presentation

Return of separeted and unaccompanied children to institutional reception or family

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Return of separeted and unaccompanied children to institutional reception or family

Return of separetedandunaccompaniedchildrentoinstitutionalreception or family

The current state of affairs

The perspective of states

The perspective of children

Return to family

Return toinstitutionalreception

UNICEF approach

Recommendations


Current state

Current state

  • A significant number of unaccompanied children in the EU

  • States invest heavily in increasing the number of returns

  • Yet, return hardly takes place

  • Asylum is in many cases not granted

  • Consequences: long periods of uncertainty, illegality when approaching 18, ageing out then return, voluntary return (as a result of pressure or not)


The perspective of states

The perspective of states

Return of rejected asylum cases is desired. The only options are:

  • Return to family

  • Return to ‘adequate reception’


The perspective of children

The perspective of children

Upon rejection of an asylum claim:

  • Facing pressure from the state to return

  • Facing the future of turning 18

  • For a part of them - facing pressure from the family to achieve the goals they left for

  • For a part of them – fear for the consequences of actually returning


Return to family

Return to family

  • Family tracing as an area of investment:

    • methodology and safeguards are undefined, emerging from practice

    • Consent of and/or information to the child?

    • Which actors to use for tracing?

    • Safeguards when tracing?

    • Moment to start the trace?

    • Is the goal re-establishing contact in search of a durable solution or establishing that a child is not unaccompanied


Return to institutional reception

Return toinstitutionalreception

  • Is it happening?

  • Only real frame of reference with return houses: the Netherlands – Angola, 2003-2005 (and inactive –present).

  • Facts:

    • None arrived, only 3 to 6 went between 2003 and 2005

    • Voluntary return went up (several hundreds of Angolan minors), illegality increased

    • Intimidating effects were assumed, but the facts hardly support this (attribution).

    • No monitoring, incidental information on their well-being (from good to very bad)

      More recently it emerged as a policy goal several times


Return to institutional reception1

Return toinstitutionalreception

  • Is return to institutional reception choice as a result of a best interest determination?

  • When is reception adequate?

  • What are ‘local standards’ and how are those defined?

  • What is the long-term perspective upon return?

  • Are effects monitored?


Unicef approach

UNICEF approach

  • International obligations should be central in the approach

  • Turn priorities: prioritize a durable solution and best interest determination over the focus on an actual return

  • A changed perspective: durable solutions are not reached for the target group, instead of the number of returns is too low


Recommendations

Recommendations

  • Assess the security situation carefully, on a country and local basis and specifically for children

  • Carry out a BID to identify a durable solution for every separated child

  • Develop and use child rights-based procedures for tracing and contacting families

  • Respect the best interests of children in returning to families

  • Work on possibilities for long-term development and durable solutions

  • Conduct public consultations now on policy provisions needed to accompany emerging practices

  • Do not return children tot institutional reception unless the recommended safeguards are in pace


Sources contact

Sources & contact

  • Upcoming report: Children’s rights in return policy and practice;The return of separated and unaccompanied children to institutional reception or family (UNICEF & UNICEF National Committees)

    [email protected]

    0031 6 10687626


  • Login