1 / 52

DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA 21-213 ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION

DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA 21-213 ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION. Joint Advisory Committee Meeting on OTC Availability of Lovastatin 10 mg. Actual Use Trials Andrea Leonard-Segal, M.D. Division of OTC Drug Products. Outline. 3 Actual Use Trials Self-Selection and Compliance issues (trial 076)

jarvis
Download Presentation

DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA 21-213 ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DRAFT SLIDES FOR NDA 21-213 ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATION

  2. Joint Advisory Committee Meeting on OTC Availability of Lovastatin 10 mg Actual Use Trials Andrea Leonard-Segal, M.D. Division of OTC Drug Products

  3. Outline • 3 Actual Use Trials • Self-Selection and Compliance issues (trial 076) • Compliance issues (trial 079) • Self-selection and safety (trial 081)

  4. Actual Use Studies Background • Simulate OTC Use of a Product • Exclusion criteria: The fewer the better! • Self-selection: Are people choosing product properly based on indications and contraindications? • Compliance: Are dosing and duration of use according to directions? • Safety: What are the adverse experiences? • Efficacy information often limited by open-label, uncontrolled design

  5. Actual Use Issues for Lovastatin • Cholesterol: • Do people know their values? • Do they understand TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C? • Do they understand when to treat? • What is the treatment goal and do consumers understand it?

  6. Actual Use Issues (Continued) • Cholesterol Measurement: • Can OTC desktop cholesterol screening offer accurate cholesterol measurement? • What is the appropriate duration of fast prior to measurement? • How many measurements should be performed to obtain an accurate value? • If averaging multiple cholesterol values is recommended, can consumers do the math?

  7. Actual Use Issues (Continued) • Self-Selection: • Can consumers understand what underlying conditions and concomitant medications put them at safety risk if they take lovastatin? • Do consumers know when they are taking contraindicated drugs? • Do consumers understand when to seek the counsel of a physician?

  8. Actual Use Issues (Continued) • Compliance: • Are consumers sufficiently compliant in the OTC setting to derive clinical benefits of lovastatin treatment over the long-term? • Benefit and Risk • Is monitoring needed to determine if there has been a benefit of use as well as no adverse safety events? • Can consumers identify symptoms associated with adverse events?

  9. Actual Use Issues (Cont’d) • Label: • Can a label adequately convey all necessary information about lovastatin so it can be used properly?

  10. Inclusion Criteria Common to Trials 076, 079, 081 • TC = 200-240 mg/dl • LDL-C  130 mg/dl • HDL-C was not an inclusion criterion

  11. Exclusion Criteria Common to Trials 076, 077, 081 • Current or recent (< 2 months) participation in drug study • Allergy to lovastatin • Current or Hx liver disease • Contraindicated drugs • Other cholesterol medication

  12. Exclusion Criteria Common to 076, 079, 081 (Cont’d) • Hx heart disease • FHx MI before age 55 (parents, siblings) • Pregnant, breast-feeding, childbearing potential • Inability to read English • HDL-C was not an exclusion criterion

  13. Sponsor’s Definitions • Persistence = # (%) of subjects who returned for a follow-up visit having taken any of the study tablets • Compliance was calculated in persistent subjects and was defined as: • # tablets taken/# days drug taken during specified time period • Expressed as a percentage

  14. Open-label Uncontrolled Multicenter (pharmacies) 24-week (4 visits) “Extension trial” option To Evaluate: LDL-C Self-selection Compliance Adverse experiences Study Design - 076

  15. Criteria - 076 • Inclusion (as described) plus: • Age: • Men  45; women  55 • General good health; no disabling disease • Low-fat diet during previous year • Exclusion (as described) plus: • Corticosteroid use • Peripheral vascular disease •  3 alcoholic beverages/day most days

  16. Label - 076 • “Pharmacy” Label: • Lists Inclusion-Exclusion criteria • Did not list all interactive medications • 1 tablet qhs • Retest cholesterol after 8 weeks and contact study doctor if level did not decrease

  17. Recruitment via ads Review “Pharmacy” label and make self-selection decision Complete Hx form Pharmacist triage: potentially qualified or not Cholesterol test ( 2-hr fast) Qualified received study drug Study Design - 076

  18. Study Design - 076 • Return visits: • count returned pills • record adverse events • lipid profile • new drug at visits 2, 3

  19. Results - 076 (Self-Selection) • 722 (12%) of all 6095 study participants qualified to receive drug • 981 (16%) of study participants self-selected to obtain and use the drug • Only 119 (12%) of this self-selection group actually received drug

  20. Results - 076 (Self-Selection) • 6081 completed self-selection process • 82% needed more than “Pharmacy” label to decide whether to obtain drug • 53% thought they met criteria for TC level, but did not • No information about how well consumers understood the meaning of the components of the lipid profile

  21. Results - 076 (Self-Selection) • 5% who were likely to buy lovastatin were in “safety risk” group • Liver disease (72) • Prohibited medications as per label (44) • Pregnancy risk (3) • Allergic to lovastatin (8)

  22. Results - 076 (Compliance) • Completion, Persistence and Compliance: • 523/722 (72%) completed the study • 504/722 (69%) were persistent at last visit (Visit 4) • 441/722 (61%) were taking  75% of medicine at Visit 4 • No diary, so precise information about how people actually dosed is unavailable.

  23. Multicenter Open-Label Uncontrolled Storefront 8 weeks “Extension trial” option To test: Mean change in LDL at 8 weeks Ability of consumers to remain on lovastatin Tolerability of lovastatin as measured by AE incidence Study Design - 079

  24. Study Design - 079 • Recruitment via ads • Telephone history screening

  25. Criteria • Inclusion (as described) plus: • men  40; women  55 • Exclusion (as described) plus: •  3 alcoholic beverages most days; diabetes; angina; peripheral vascular disease; TIA; stroke; invasive procedures (PTCA, CABG); taking >1 BP drug; diastolic BP  100 or systolic BP  180 mm/Hg; subjects who knew their TC was < 190 mg/dl or > 250 mg/dl; corticosteroids

  26. Study Label - 079 • “Restricted Access” Label • Designed to reinforce appropriate post-purchase behavior, not to guide self-selection • Contained trial inclusion and exclusion criteria • More expansive list of contraindicated medications than “Pharmacy” label • Recommended seeing doctor at least yearly to discuss cholesterol treatment plan

  27. Study Design - 079 • Storefront appointment for potentially eligible (Visit 1) • Lipid profile (6-hour fast) • BP • Weight, Height • Eligible received drug with “Restricted Access” label and study information card

  28. Study Design - 079 • Visit 2 (approximately week 8) • Lipid profile (6-hour fast) • Collect remaining drug tablets • Adverse experience information collected

  29. Results - 079 • 4878 called telephone number • 1312 (27%) potentially eligible and visited storefront • 60% of these were not qualified (cholesterol) • 460 (9%) received study drug

  30. Results - 079 • Persistence and Compliance • 363 people took some drug (were persistent) • 265 were compliant at least 75% of the time over the 8-week study • No diary, so precise information about how people actually dosed is unavailable. • Trial did not test the ability of consumers to properly self-select

  31. Study Design - 081 • Open-label • Uncontrolled • Multicenter • Storefront clinical sites • 4 Weeks • “Extension trial” option

  32. Study Design - 081Objectives • To test: • Effectiveness of an enhanced “Red Arrow” label & reinforcement tools (videotape, pamphlet, insert) • Effectiveness of these in 3 risk subsets: • drug risk • 1° prevention subjects (cholesterol > 240 mg/dl) • high cardiovascular risk group • Tolerability of lovastation 10 mg as measured by incidence of adverse events.

  33. Criteria • Inclusion • Men  40; women  1 year post-menopausal • Express interest in purchasing lovastatin • Exclusion • Employed in healthcare • Diabetes • Stroke • Taking > 1 anti-hypertension drug • Participated in cholesterol lowering study < 2 years

  34. Label - 081 • “Red Arrow” label • Flip-up back panel design • Warnings emphasized with red arrows and stop signs • Examples of muscle pain, tenderness or weakness added to drug interaction warnings • “Warnings” precede “who should use” • Boxed warning to “carefully read package before self-selecting and call a product specialist for help understanding the label”

  35. Study Design - 081 • Recruitment via ads • Visit 1 - Storefront site: • Participants read product concept & label; then made self-selection decision • If “yes” paid $15 for lovastatin 10 mg and answered specific safety risk questions • Contraindicated meds • Current liver disease • Childbearing potential • Allergy to lovastatin

  36. Study Design - 081 • If participant self-selected, “yes,” but was excluded for safety risk: • 2nd chance to review label and reinforcements and to make self-selection decision • No drug was provided

  37. Study Design - 081 • Cholesterol test offered to those who needed before could self-select, then: • Repeat self-selection decision • Answered safety risk questions • Medical Hx performed on all who left storefront site without drug: • Self-selected “no” • Failed safety risk exclusion questions • Did not want to purchase

  38. Study Design - 081 • Eligible Participants • Received 4-week supply of open-label lovastatin 10 mg • Were told to take drug according to label

  39. Study Design - 081 • Were given incentive to call toll-free # • Those who did were asked medical Hx using screening script (incl-excl criteria) • If deemed inappropriate for drug, were told to: • D/C • return remaining drug and packaging

  40. Study Design - 081 • Visit 2 (Week 4) • Returned packaging and unused drug • For those who had not called toll-free #, nurse administered medical Hx and determined appropriateness of Rx • Lipid testing for those interested in extension

  41. Results - 081 • 2416 subjects screened overall • 1230 (51%) self-selected, “yes” • 1144 (47%) received drug; 86 did not (safety risk)

  42. Results - 081Completed vs Discontinued • 74% completed the 4-week study • Reasons the rest discontinued: • 10% not appropriate (as per medical Hx) • 6% adverse experience • 4% lost to follow-up • 3% returned drug by mail • 2% withdrew consent

  43. Results - 081 • Self-selection errors among the 1144: • Heart disease - 22 • Stroke/TIA - 14 • Other cholesterol treatment - 45 • Hypertension 211 (147 on medication) • Hx hepatitis or liver disease - 35 • Alcohol  3/day - 26 • Diabetes - 23

  44. Results - 081 (Self-Selection) • 1112/2264 consumers with known medical history said they would purchase • 39% self-selected erroneously after seeing label • Decreased to 22% erroneous self-selection after seeing label + reinforcements • 61% of subjects with known medical eligibility status did not call toll-free # • 36% were ineligible to take lovastatin

  45. Results - 081: Safety Group Self-Selection Errors After Label • Safety risk group = 120 participants • 83 took interacting medication • 30% self-selected incorrectly to take lovastatin • 16 < 1 year postmenopausal • 50% self-selected incorrectly • 14 - current liver disease • 36% self-selected incorrectly • 8 - allergic • 13% self-selected incorrectly

  46. Results - 081: Cardiovascular Self-Selection Error After Label) • 381 subjects with cholesterol > 240 mg/dl as only contraindication • 46% self-selected incorrectly • 262 participants were in high cardiovascular risk categories • 32% self-selected incorrectly to take lovastatin

  47. Results - 081 (Safety) • 15% people who received drug had an adverse experience (AE) likely related to lovastatin • 4% discontinued due to drug-related AE • None of 6 serious AE likely to have been study-drug related • Incomplete information because LFTs and CPKs were not done & short duration Rx

  48. Conclusions (Overall) • Cholesterol: • Many lack accurate knowledge of their cholesterol values • Trials do not assess if consumers understand LDL-C and HDL-C levels • NCEP guidelines were not used to determine cholesterol values. • Not known if OTC consumers would comply with standard fasting recommendations & >1 blood test prior to use

  49. Conclusions • Treatment goal was a lower cholesterol value (not a clinical endpoint) • Appropriateness of that goal and whether consumers understood it was not addressed

  50. Conclusions • Self-Selection: • Self-selection errors were common • It was not demonstrated that subjects know when to involve their physicians • Compliance in the OTC setting is less than desired over the short-term

More Related