Jisc cetis and ukoer3
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 26

JISC CETIS and UKOER3 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 92 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

JISC CETIS and UKOER3. Phil Barker < [email protected] > JISC CETIS Learning Technology Adviser http://jisc.cetis.ac.uk/. About JISC CETIS. JISC Innovation Support Centre: Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards

Download Presentation

JISC CETIS and UKOER3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Jisc cetis and ukoer3

JISC CETIS and UKOER3

Phil Barker <[email protected]>

JISC CETIS Learning Technology Adviser

http://jisc.cetis.ac.uk/


About jisc cetis

About JISC CETIS

  • JISC Innovation Support Centre: Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards

  • provide strategic technical advice to JISC, supporting its development programmes

  • representing JISC on international standardisationinitiatives

  • support various JISC Programmes


Highlights from cetis oer phase 3 support

Highlights from CETIS OER phase 3 support

  • The technical guidelines & requirements will be similar to phases 1 and 2

    • There will be some commentary on where we think projects haven’t engaged with these as we expected.

    • Look out for a blog post.

  • We will try to promote innovation around OER projects through informed engagement with new & upcoming initiatives.

    • Informed about degree of speculation/risk

    • That’s what I’ll be talking about here


Informed about risk

‘Informed about risk’

  • Hype Cycle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle


Some initiatives for oer projects to think about

Some Initiatives for OER projects to think about

  • Aggregating & showcasing

  • Microformats/microdata/schema.org/LRMI

    • Attribution and tracking

  • SWORD

  • Learning registry & paradata


Aggregation for the nation

Aggregation for the nation!

  • Want to showcase the output of UKOER, so that funders know how good it is

  • It’s remarkably difficult to find where the outputs of some individual phase 1 and 2 projects are.

  • Need some way of automatically pulling out the resources that come from the UKOER projects

    Suggest:

    • Project tag

    • RSS feed

    • Project “set” within a larger collection

  • Low risk, basic action.


Jisc cetis and ukoer3

  • Make it easy for people to find your resources

  • Make it easy for machines to find your resources


Learning resource metadata initiative

Learning Resource Metadata Initiative

  • A profile of schema.org microdata mark-up

  • Allows the human readable (self-)description of an html resource to be marked up as machine readable metadata.

  • For example ... imagine this presentation as a set of web pages.

  • It is obvious that the title, author, licence and some other resource description stuff should be displayed prominently in it.


Jisc cetis and ukoer31

JISC CETIS and UKOER3

Phil Barker <[email protected]>

JISC CETIS Learning Technology Adviser

http://jisc.cetis.ac.uk/


Jisc cetis and ukoer3

...

  • To some people it would be obvious that there should be machine readable metadata

    <head>

    <title>JISC CETIS and OER</title><link rel="schema.DCTERMS" href="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" /><link rel="DCTERMS.author" href="http://people.pjjk.net/phil#id" />...


Jisc cetis and ukoer3

  • But Google, Yahoo, Bing (among others) don’t trust invisible metadata.

  • However, their computers would like some help in understanding what is displayed on a web page

  • So they promote schema.org, as a means of marking up the meaning of displayed text.

    • Microdata semantics.


Schema org microdata semantics

Schema.org microdata semantics

<body itemscopeitemtype=‘http://schema.org/WebPage’>

<h1 itemprop=‘name’>JISC CETIS and UKOER 3</h1>

<p itemprop=‘author’

itemscopeitemtype=‘http://schema.org/Person’>

<span itemprop=‘name’>Phil Barker</span>

<span itemprop=‘email’>[email protected]</span>

...</p>


But is an oer more than a web page

But is an OER more than a web page?

  • Is there anything that you would want to say about an OER that is education specific?

  • Learning resource metadata initiative: apply and extend schema.org to learning resources.


Jisc cetis and ukoer3

LRMI

  • Funded by Gates and Hewlett foundations

  • Backed by Google & Microsoft

  • Led by Creative Commons and the Association of Educational Publishers

  • Focussing on identifying a small number of education specific properties of a learning resource

    • What is it

    • Who is it for

    • What is it for

    • What does it teach/assess

    • ...

    • http://www.lrmi.net/


Risk assessment

Risk Assessment

  • Little effort involved assuming you can control the HTML mark-up generated by your CMS / repository.

  • Marking resource descriptions using schema.org microdata may help search engine optimisation.

    • Perhaps will help with some types of resource more than others

  • LRMI specific mark-up is more experimental, we would like to work with some first adopters.


Attribution and tracking

Attribution and tracking

  • The copy&paste HTML licence information from Creative Commons comes with semantic mark up

    • Enables tools like OpenAttribute

    • http://openattribute.com/

  • Building on that CaPRéT project has build an attribution tool

    • Also includes a tracking gif in copied text

    • http://capret.mitoeit.org/


Learning registry

Learning Registry

  • Trying to help people find the right resource by facilitating the exchange of value judgements about resources.

  • Technical protocols for the aggregation of “paradata”

    Paradata: annotations, comments, ratings, ‘sharings’ likes, tweets about, +1s, recommendations and warnings

    “Social networking for learning resources”


Infrastructure

Infrastructure

http://blogs.cetis.ac.uk/othervoices/2011/03/22/thelearningregistry/

  • Image from Dan Rehak “The Learning registry: social networking for metadata” http://blogs.cetis.ac.uk/othervoices/2011/03/22/thelearningregistry/


Learning registry1

Learning Registry

  • Development funded by US Dept of Education since 2010

  • Community launched last week (~ public beta)

  • Defines API by which nodes interact and through which data can be put into the network

  • Current nodes are based on CouchDB running on Amazon

  • Jisc have announced experimental node


Jisc launches twitter project

Jisc launches Twitter project

Amber Thomas, Jisc programme manager, said: "This international collaboration will see us contributing the UK's expertise to the Learning Registry. We are working with Mimas and Jisc CETIS to support the registry's vision of gathering together the conversations, ratings, recommendations and usage data around digital content.

Guardian government computing http://www.guardian.co.uk/government-computing-network/2011/nov/09/jisc-launches-twitter-project


Assessment

Assessment

  • Speculative

  • People who are gathering or might use ‘paradata’ should think about whether they could help test the learning registry concept

    • Evaluate data format for paradata

    • Provide paradata

    • See whether learning registry has relevant paradata

    • Don’t bet the farm on it


Sword

SWORD

  • Simple Web-service Offering Repository Deposit

  • Based on ATOM Pub

  • SWORD 2 supports CRUD

  • Supported by a number of repository platforms and tools


Sword background

SWORD Background

  • SWORD development project supported by JISC

  • JISC also funded miniprojects for SWORD v2 tools

    • Connexions, cnx.org

    • Right-click deposit

  • Intralibrary have demonstrated a SWORD-based ‘share’ app for mobile phones


Assessment1

Assessment

  • Fairly well established in some contexts.

  • May enable resource dissemination by helping workflow; especially where deposit is close to creation/repurposing.

  • Would require some effort if existing repository and tool implementations don’t align with OER context.

  • Explorative


Contacts

Contacts

CETIS Web site: http://jisc.cetis.ac.uk/

OER work: http://jisc.cetis.ac.uk/topic/OER

Phil Barker: <[email protected]>

Lorna M. Campbell: <[email protected]>

R. John Robertson <[email protected]>


Licence and attribution

Licence and attribution

This work is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA.

By Phil Barker <[email protected]>, JISC CETIS <http://jisc.cetis.ac.uk>


  • Login