- 83 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Strings and Languages Operations

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Strings and Languages Operations

Concatenation

Exponentiation

Kleene Star

Regular Expressions

- Concatenation
- Exponentiation
- Kleene star
- Pages 27-30 of the text

- Regular expressions
- Pages 71-75 of the text

- If x and y are strings over alphabet S, the concatenation of x and y is the string xy formed by writing the symbols of x and the symbols of y consecutively.
- Suppose x = abb and y = ba
- xy = abbba
- yx = baabb

- Suppose x, y, and z are strings.
- Concatenation is not commutative.
- xy is not guaranteed to be equal to yx

- Concatenation is associative
- (xy)z = x(yz) = xyz

- The empty string is the identity for concatenation
- x/\ = /\x = x

- Suppose L1 and L2 are languages (sets of strings).
- The concatenation of L1 and L2, denoted L1L2,is defined as
- L1L2 = { xy | x L1 and y L2 }

- Example,
- Let L1 = { ab, bba } and L2 = { aa, b, ba }
- What is L1L2?

- Solution
- Let x1= ab, x2= bba, y1= aa, y2= b, y3= ba
- L1L2 = { x1y1, x1y2, x1y3, x2y1, x2y2, x2y3 } = { abaa, abb, abba, bbaaa, bbab, bbaba}

- Let L1 = { aa, bb, ba } and L2 = { /\, aba }
- Let x1= aa, x2= bb, x3=ba, y1= /\, y2= aba
- L1L2 = { x1y1, x1y2, x2y1, x2y2, x3y1, x3y2 } = { aa, aaaba, bb, bbaba, ba, baaba }
- L2L1 = { y1x1, y1x2, y1x3, y2x1, y2x2, y2x3 } = { aa, bb, ba, abaaa, ababb, ababa }
- L2L2 = { y1y1, y1y2, y2y1, y2y2 } = { /\, aba, aba, abaaba } = { /\, aba, abaaba } (dropped extra aba)

- (L1L2)L3 = L1(L2L3) = L1L2L3
- Example
- Let L1={a,b}, L2={c,d}, and L3={e,f}
- L1L2L3=({a,b}{c,d}){e,f} ={ac, ad, bc, bd}{e,f} ={ ace,acf,ade,aef,bce,bcf,bde,bdf }
- L1L2L3={a,b}({c,d}{e,f}) ={a,b}{ce, df, ce, df} ={ ace,acf,ade,aef,bce,bcf,bde,bdf }

- What language is the identity for language concatenation?
- The set containing only the empty string /\: {/\}
- Example
- {aab,ba,abc}{/\} = {/\}{aab,ba,abc} = {aab,ba,abc}

- What about {}?
- For any language L, L {} = {} L = {}
- Thus {} for concatenation is like 0 for multiplication

- Example
- {aab,ba,abc}{} = {}{aab,ba,abc} = {}
- The intuitive reason is that we must choose a string from both sets that are being concatenated, but there is nothing to choose from {}.

- For any language L, L {} = {} L = {}

- We use exponentiation to indicate the number of items being concatenated
- Symbols
- Strings
- Set of symbols (S for example)
- Set of strings (languages)

- a3 = aaa
- x3 = xxx
- S3 = SSS = { x S* | |x|=3 }
- L3 = LLL

- Let x=abb, S={a,b}, L={ab,b}
- a4 = aaaa
- x3 = (abb)(abb)(abb) = abbabbabb
- S3= SSS = {a,b}{a,b}{a,b}={aaa,aab,aba,abb,baa,bab,bba,bbb}
- L3 = LLL = {ab,b}{ab,b}{ab,b}= {ababab,ababb,abbab,abbb, babab,babb,bbab,bbb}

- Exponentiation of a symbol or a string results in a string.
- Exponentiation of a set of symbols or a set of strings results in a set of strings
- a symbol a string
- a string a string
- a set of symbols a set of strings
- a set of strings a set of strings

- a0 = /\
- x0 = /\
- S0 = { /\ }
- L0 = { /\ } for any language L
- {aa,bb}0 = { /\ }
- { a, aa, aaa, aaaa, …}0 = { /\ }
- { /\ }0 = { /\ }
- 0 = { }0 = { /\ }

- Kleene * is a unary operation on languages.
- Kleene * is not an operation on strings
- However, see the pages on regular expressions.

- L* represents any finite number of concatenations of L.
L* = Uk>0 Lk = L0U L1U L2U …

- For any L, /\ is always an element of L*
- because L0 = { /\ }

- Thus, for any L, L* !=

- Let L={aa}
- L0={ /\ }
- L1=L={aa }
- L2={ aaaa }
- L3= …
- L* = L0 L1 L2 L3 …
- = { /\, aa, aaaa, aaaaaa, … }
- = set of all strings that can be obtained by concatenating 0 or more copies of aa

- Let L={aa, b}
- L0={ /\ }
- L1=L={aa,b}
- L2= LL={ aaaa, aab, baa, bb}
- L3= …
- L* = L0 L1 L2 L3 …
- = set of all strings that can be obtained by concatenating 0 or more copies of aa and b

- Regular languages are languages that can be obtained from the very simple languages over S, using only
- Union
- Concatenation
- Kleene Star

- See lecture 14 and pages 71-75 of the text

- {aab} (i.e. {a}{a}{b} )
- {aa,b} (i.e. {a}{a} {b} )
- {a,b}* language of strings that can be obtained by concatenating any number of a’s and b’s
- {bb}{a,b}* language of strings that begin with bb (followed by any number of a’s and b’s)
- {a}*{bb,/\} language of strings that begin with any number of a’s and end with an optional bb.
- {a}*{b}* language of strings that consist of only a’s or only b’s and /\.

- We can simplify the formula for regular languages slightly by
- leaving out the set brackets { } and
- replacing with +

- The results are called regular expressions.

- Consider the regular expression a*(bb+/\)
- a*(bb+/\) is a string over alphabet {a, b, *, +, /\, (, ), }
- a*(bb+/\) represents a language over alphabet {a, b}
- It represents the language of strings over {a,b} that begin with any number of a’s and end with an optional bb.

- Some regular expressions look just like strings over alphabet {a,b}
- Regular expression aaba represents the language {aaba}
- Regular expression /\ represents the language {/\}

- It should be clear from the context whether a sequence of symbols is a regular expression or just a string.

- Course: CSE 460
- Instructor: Dr. Eric Torng
- TA: To be determined

- Philosophy of computing course
- We take a step back to think about computing in broader terms

- Science of computing course
- We study fundamental ideas/results that shape the field of computer science

- “Applied” computing course
- We learn study a broad range of material with relevance to computing today

Phil. of life

What is the purpose of life?

What are we capable of accomplishing in life?

Are there limits to what we can do in life?

Why do we drive on parkways and park on driveways?

Phil. of computing

What is the purpose of programming?

What can we achieve through programming?

Are there limits to what we can do with programs?

Why don’t debuggers actually debug programs?

Physics

Study of fundamental physical laws and phenomenon like gravity and electricity

Engineering

Governed by physical laws

Our material

Study of fundamental computational laws and phenomenon like undecidability and universal computers

Programming

Governed by computational laws

- Applications are not immediately obvious
- In some cases, seeing the applicability of this material requires advanced abstraction skills
- Every year, there are people who leave this course unable to see the applicability of the material

- Others require more material in order to completely understand their application
- for example, to understand how regular expressions and context-free grammars are applied to the design of compilers, you need to take a compilers course

- In some cases, seeing the applicability of this material requires advanced abstraction skills

- Important programming languages
- regular expressions (perl)
- finite state automata (used in hardware design)
- context-free grammars

- Proofs of program correctness
- Subroutines
- Using them to prove problems are unsolvable

- String searching/Pattern matching
- Algorithm design concepts such as recursion

- What are the capabilities and limitations of computers and computer programs?
- What can we do with computers/programs?
- Are there things we cannot do with computers/programs?

- Problems
- Programs
- Programming languages

Problems

We view solving problems as the main application for computer programs

Inputs

Outputs

- A problem is a mapping or function between a set of inputs and a set of outputs
- Example Problem: Sorting

(4,2,3,1)

(1,2,3,4)

(3,1,2,4)

(1,5,7)

(7,5,1)

(1,2,3)

(1,2,3)

- Input
- Describe what an input instance looks like

- Output
- Describe what task should be performed on the input
- In particular, describe what output should be produced

- Sorting problem
- Input
- Integers n1, n2, ..., nk

- Output
- n1, n2, ..., nk in nondecreasing order

- Input
- Find element problem
- Input
- Integers n1, n2, …, nk
- Search key S

- Output
- yes if S is in n1, n2, …, nk, no otherwise

- Input

Programs

Programs solve problems

- Why do we write programs?
- One answer
- To solve problems
- What does it mean to solve a problem?
- Informal answer: For every legal input, a correct output is produced.
- Formal answer: To be given later

- Definition
- A programming language defines what constitutes a legal program
- Example: a pseudocode program may not be a legal C++ program which may not be a legal C program
- A programming language is typically referred to as a “computational model” in a course like this.

- Our programming language will be C++ with minor modifications
- Main procedure will use input parameters in a fashion similar to other procedures
- no argc/argv

- Output will be returned
- type specified by main function type

- Main procedure will use input parameters in a fashion similar to other procedures

- Input
- integer n >= 1
- List of n integers

- Output
- The largest of the n integers

int main(int A[], int n) {

int i, max;

if (n < 1)

return (“Illegal Input”);

max = A[0];

for (i = 1; i < n; i++)

if (A[i] > max)

max = A[i];

return (max);

}

Fundamental Theme

Exploring capabilities and limitations of C++ programs

- We will study the capabilities and limits of C++ programs
- Specifically, we will try and identify
- What problems can be solved by C++ programs
- What problems cannot be solved by C++ programs

- Is C++ general enough?
- Or is it possible that there exists some problem P such that
- P can be solved by some program P in some other reasonable programming language
- but P cannot be solved by any C++ program?

- We have no proof of an answer, but it is commonly accepted that the answer is no.
- Church’s Thesis (three identical statements)
- C++ is a general model of computation
- Any algorithm can be expressed as a C++ program
- If some algorithm cannot be expressed by a C++ program, it cannot be expressed in any reasonable programming language

- Problems
- When we talk about what programs can or cannot “DO”, we mean what PROBLEMS can or cannot be solved

- One of the main themes of this course will be to classify problems in various ways
- By solvability
- Solvable, “half-solvable”, unsolvable

- By solvability
- We will focus our study on decision problems
- function (one correct answer for every input)
- finite range (yes or no is the correct output)

Set of Problems

Subset 1

Subset 2

Subset 3

- Take some set of problems and partition it into two or more subsets of problems where membership in a subset is based on some shared problem characteristic

Set of All Problems

Solvable Problems

Unsolvable Problems

- Criteria used is whether or not the problem is solvable
- that is, does there exist a C++ program which solves the problem?

Set of All Problems

Non-Function Problems

Function Problems

- We will focus on problems where the mapping from input to output is a function

Inputs

Outputs

- the mapping is a relation
- that is, more than one output is possible for a given input

Inputs

Outputs

- mapping is a function
- unique output for each input

1

3

9

Inputs

Outputs

- Divisor Problem
- Input: Positive integer n
- Output: A positive integral divisor of n

9

10

Inputs

Outputs

- Sorting
- Multiplication Problem
- Input: 2 integers x and y
- Output: xy

2,5

1

3

9

Inputs

Outputs

- Maximum divisor problem
- Input: Positive integer n
- Output: size of maximum divisor of n smaller than n

9

Set of Function Problems

Non-Decision Problems

Decision Problems

- We will focus on function problems where the correct answer is always yes or no

Yes

No

Inputs

Outputs

- Output is yes or no
- range = {Yes, No}

- Note, problem must be a function problem
- only one of Yes/No is correct

(1,3,2,4)

Yes

(1,2,3,4)

No

Inputs

Outputs

- Decision sorting
- Input: list of integers
- Yes/No question: Is the list in nondecreasing order?

(3,5,14)

Yes

(3,5,15)

No

Inputs

Outputs

- Decision multiplication
- Input: Three integers x, y, z
- Yes/No question: Is xy = z?

(14,5)

Yes

(14,7)

No

Inputs

Outputs

- Decision Divisor Problem
- Input: Two integers x and y
- Yes/No question: Is y a divisor of x?

Other

Probs

Decision

Problems

Set of All Problems

Solvable Problems

Unsolvable Problems

- When studying solvability, we are going to focus specifically on decision problems
- There is no loss of generality, but we will not explore that here

Set of All Problems

Finite Domain Problems

Infinite Domain Problems

- These problems have only a finite number of inputs

Set of All Problems

Infinite

Domain

Finite

Domain

Empty

Solvable Problems

Unsolvable Problems

- All finite domain problems can be solved using “table lookup” idea

int main(string x) {

switch x {

case “Bill”: return(3);

case “Judy”: return(25);

case “Tom”: return(30);

default: cerr << “Illegal input\n”;

}

- Classification Theme
- Decision Problems
- Important subset of problems
- We can focus our attention on decision problems without loss of generality
- Same is not true for finite domain problems
- Table lookup

- Analysis of decision problems
- Two types of inputs:yes inputs and no inputs
- Language recognition problem

- Analysis of programs which solve decision problems
- Four types of inputs: yes, no, crash, loop inputs
- Solving and not solving decision problems

- Classifying Decision Problems
- Formal definition of solvable and unsolvable decision problems

Analyzing Decision Problems

Can be defined by two sets

Set of All Legal Inputs

Yes Inputs

No Inputs

- Decision problems consist of 3 sets
- The set of legal input instances (or universe of input instances)
- The set of “yes” input instances
- The set of “no” input instances

- Only two of these sets are needed; the third is redundant
- Given
- The set of legal input instances (or universe of input instances)
- This is given by the description of a typical input instance

- The set of “yes” input instances
- This is given by the yes/no question

- The set of legal input instances (or universe of input instances)
- We can compute
- The set of “no” input instances

- Given

- S*: The set of all finite length strings over finite alphabet S
- Examples
- {a}*: {/\, a, aa, aaa, aaaa, aaaaa, … }
- {a,b}*: {/\, a, b, aa, ab, ba, bb, aaa, aab, aba, abb, … }
- {0,1}*: {/\, 0, 1, 00, 01, 10, 11, 000, 001, 010, 011, … }

- Examples
- The set of all integers
- If the input universe is understood, a decision problem can be specified by just giving the set of yes input instances

- Input Universe
- S* for some finite alphabet S

- Yes input instances
- Some set L subset of S*

- No input instances
- S* - L

- When S is understood, a language recognition problem can be specified by just stating what L is.

Traditional Formulation

Input

A string x over some finite alphabet S

Task

Is x in some language L subset of S*?

3 set formulation

Input Universe

S* for a finite alphabet S

Yes input instances

Some set L subset of S*

No input instances

S* - L

When S is understood, a language recognition problem can be specified by just stating what L is.

- All decision problems can be formulated as language recognition problems
- Simply develop an encoding scheme for representing all inputs of the decision problem as strings over some fixed alphabet S
- The corresponding language is just the set of strings encoding yes input instances

- In what follows, we will often use decision problems and languages interchangeably

Yes Inputs

Language L

Encoding

Scheme over

alphabet S

No Inputs

S* - L

Corresponding

Language Recognition

Problem

Original Decision

Problem

Analyzing Programs which Solve Decision Problems

Four possible outcomes

- Suppose a program P is designed to solve some decision problem P. What does P’s declaration look like?
- What should P return on a yes input instance?
- What should P return on a no input instance?

- Suppose a program P is designed to solve a language recognition problem P. What does P’s declaration look like?
- bool main(string x) {
- We will assume that the string declaration is correctly defined for the input alphabet S
- If S = {a,b}, then string will define variables consisting of only a’s and b’s
- If S = {a, b, …, z, A, …, Z}, then string will define variables consisting of any string of alphabet characters

- We will assume that the string declaration is correctly defined for the input alphabet S

- bool main(string x) {

- Notation
- P denotes a program
- x denotes an input for program P

- 4 possible outcomes of running P on x
- P halts and says yes: P accepts input x
- P halts and says no: P rejects input x
- P halts without saying yes or no: P crashes on input x
- We typically ignore this case as it can be combined with rejects

- P never halts: P infinite loops on input x

- Based on the 4 possible outcomes of running P on x, P partitions the set of legal inputs into 4 groups
- Y(P): The set of inputs P accepts
- When the problem is a language recognition problem, Y(P) is often represented as L(P)

- N(P): The set of inputs P rejects
- C(P): The set of inputs P crashes on
- I(P): The set of inputs P infinite loops on
- Because L(P) is often used in place of Y(P) as described above, we use notation I(P) to represent this set

- Y(P): The set of inputs P accepts

Y(P)

N(P)

C(P)

All Inputs

I(P)

Analyzing Programs and Decision Problems

Distinguish the two carefully

I(P)

Y(P)

N(P)

C(P)

- Formal Definition:
- A program P solves decision problem P if and only if
- The set of legal inputs for P is identical to the set of input instances of P
- Y(P) is the same as the set of yes input instances for P
- N(P) is the same as the set of no input instances for P

- Otherwise, program P does not solve problem P
- Note C(P) and I(P) must be empty in order for P to solve problem P

- A program P solves decision problem P if and only if

- A decision problem P is solvable if and only if there exists some C++ program P which solves P
- When the decision problem is a language recognition problem for language L, we often say that L is solvable or L is decidable

- A decision problem P is unsolvable if and only if all C++ programs P do not solve P
- Similar comment as above

C(P)

C(P)

I(P)

I(P)

Yes Inputs

No Inputs

Inputs of Problem P

Inputs of Program P

Y(P)

N(P)

I(P)

Y(P)

N(P)

C(P)

- Formal Definition:
- A program P half-solves problem P if and only if
- The set of legal inputs for P is identical to the set of input instances of P
- Y(P) is the same as the set of yes input instances for P
- N(P) union C(P) union I(P) is the same as the set of no input instances for P

- Otherwise, program P does not half-solve problem P
- Note C(P) and I(P) need not be empty

- A program P half-solves problem P if and only if

- A decision problem P is half-solvable if and only if there exists some C++ program P which half-solves P
- When the decision problem is a language recognition problem for language L, we often say that L is half-solvable

- A decision problem P is not half-solvable if and only if all C++ programs P do not half-solve P

C(P)

I(P)

Yes Inputs

No Inputs

Inputs of Problem P

Inputs of Program P

Y(P)

N(P)

Half-solvable

Solvable

All decision problems

The set of half-solvable decision problems is a proper subset of the set of all decision problems

The set of solvable decision problems is a proper subset of the set of half-solvable decision problems.

- A correct program must halt on all inputs
- Why then do we define and study half-solvable problems?
- One Answer: the set of half-solvable problems is the natural class of problems associated with general computational models like C++
- Every program half-solves some decision problem
- Some programs do not solve any decision problem
- In particular, programs which do not halt do not solve their corresponding decision problems

- Four possible outcomes of running a program on an input
- The four subsets every program divides its set of legal inputs into
- Formal definition of
- a program solving (half-solving) a decision problem
- a problem being solvable (half-solvable)
- Be precise: with the above two statements!

- Topics
- Proof of the existence of unsolvable problems
- Proof Technique
- There are more problems/languages than there are programs/algorithms
- Countable and uncountable infinities

- Proof Technique

- Proof of the existence of unsolvable problems

- We will show that there are more problems than programs
- Actually more problems than programs in any computational model (programming language)

- Implication
- Some problems are not solvable

Preliminaries

Define set of problems

Observation about programs

- We will restrict the set of problems to be the set of language recognition problems over the alphabet {a}.
- That is
- Universe: {a}*
- Yes Inputs: Some language L subset of {a}*
- No Inputs: {a}* - L

- The number of distinct problems is given by the number of languages L subset of {a}*
- 2{a}* is our shorthand for this set of subset languages

- Examples of languages L subset of {a}*
- 0 elements: { }
- 1 element: {/\}, {a}, {aa}, {aaa}, {aaaa}, …
- 2 elements: {/\, a}, {/\, aa}, {a, aa}, …
- Infinite # of elements: {an | n is even}, {an | n is prime}, {an | n is a perfect square}

- All strings in {a}* have finite length
- The number of strings in {a}* is infinite
- The number of languages L in 2{a}* is infinite
- The number of strings in a language L in 2{a}* may be finite or infinite

- The set of programs we will consider are the set of legal C++ programs as defined in earlier lectures
- Key Observation
- Each C++ program can be thought of as a finite length string over alphabet SP
- SP = {a, …, z, A, …, Z, 0, …, 9, white space, punctuation}

- Each C++ program can be thought of as a finite length string over alphabet SP

int main(int A[], int n){ {26 characters including newline}

int i, max; {13 characters including initial tab}

{1 character: newline}

if (n < 1) {12 characters}

return (“Illegal Input”); {28 characters including 2 tabs}

max = A[0]; {13 characters}

for (i = 1; i < n; i++) {25 characters}

if (A[i] > max) {18 characters}

max = A[i]; {15 characters}

return (max); {15 characters}

} {2 characters including newline}

- The set of legal C++ programs is clearly infinite
- It is also no more than |SP*|
- SP = {a, …, z, A, …, Z, 0, …, 9, white space, punctuation}

- Show that the number of languages L in 2{a}* is greater than the number of strings in SP*
- SP = {a, …, z, A, …, Z, 0, …, 9, white space, punctuation}

- Problem
- Both are infinite

How do we compare the relative sizes of infinite sets?

Bijection (yes)

Proper subset (no)

- Two sets have EQUAL size if there exists a bijection between them
- bijection is a 1-1 and onto function between two sets

- Examples
- Set {1, 2, 3} and Set {A, B, C}
- Positive even numbers and positive integers

- Positive Integers Positive Even Integers
12

24

36

......

i2i

…...

- Finite sets
- S1 proper subset of S2 implies S2 is strictly bigger than S1
- Example
- women proper subset of people
- number of women less than number of people

- Example

- S1 proper subset of S2 implies S2 is strictly bigger than S1
- Infinite sets
- Counterexample
- even numbers and integers

- Counterexample

Two sizes of infinity

Countable

Uncountable

- Definition 1
- S is equal in size (bijection) to N
- N is the set of natural numbers {1, 2, 3, …}

- S is equal in size (bijection) to N
- Definition 2 (Key property)
- There exists a way to list all the elements of set S (enumerate S) such that the following is true
- Every element appears at a finite position in the infinite list

- There exists a way to list all the elements of set S (enumerate S) such that the following is true

- Any set which is not countably infinite
- Examples
- Set of real numbers
- 2{a}*, the set of all languages L which are a subset of {a}*

- Further gradations within this set, but we ignore them

Proof

- Every C++ program is a finite string
- Thus, the set of all legal C++ programs is a language LC
- This language LC is a subset of SP*

- Enumeration ordering
- All length 0 strings
- |S|0 = 1 string: l

- All length 1 strings
- |S| strings

- All length 2 strings
- |S|2 strings

- …

- All length 0 strings
- Thus, SP* is countably infinite

- Length 0 strings
- 0 and l

- Length 1 strings
- 1 and a, 2 and b

- Length 2 strings
- 3 and aa, 4 and ab, 5 and ba, 6 and bb, ...

- Question
- write a program that takes a number as input and computes the corresponding string as output

- Diagonalization proof technique
- “Algorithmic” proof
- Typically presented as a proof by contradiction

- To prove this set is uncountably infinite, we construct an algorithm D that behaves as follows:
- Input
- A countably infinite list of languages L[] subset of {a}*

- Output
- A language D(L[]) which is a subset of {a}* that is not on list L[]

- Input

Algorithm D

List L[]

L[0]

L[1]

L[2]

L[3]

...

Language

D(L[]) not in

list L[]

- If the number of languages in 2{a}* is countably infinite, there exists a list L[] s.t.
- L[] is complete
- it contains every language in 2{a}*

- L[] is countably infinite

- L[] is complete
- The existence of algorithm D implies that no list of languages in 2{a}* is both complete and countably infinite
- Specifically, the existence of D shows that any countably infinite list of languages is not complete

Consider each string to be a feature

A set contains or does not contain each string

IN

IN

IN

IN

IN

IN

OUT

IN

OUT

IN

OUT

OUT

OUT

OUT

OUT

OUT

IN

IN

OUT

OUT

OUT

IN

OUT

OUT

IN

l

a

aa

aaa

aaaa

...

- #Rows is countably infinite
- Given

- #Cols is countably infinite
- {a}* is countably infinite

L[0]

L[1]

L[2]

L[3]

L[4]

...

- We construct D(L[]) by using a unique feature (string) to differentiate D(L[]) from L[i]
- Typically use ith string for language L[i]
- Thus the name diagonalization

D(L[])

l

a

aa

aaa

aaaa

...

OUT

L[0]

IN

IN

IN

IN

IN

L[1]

IN

OUT

IN

IN

OUT

IN

L[2]

OUT

OUT

OUT

IN

OUT

OUT

L[3]

OUT

IN

IN

OUT

IN

OUT

L[4]

OUT

IN

OUT

OUT

OUT

IN

...

l

a

aa

aaa

aaaa

...

L[0]

IN

IN

IN

IN

IN

- Do we need to use the diagonal?
- Every other column and every row?
- Every other row and every column?

- What properties are needed to construct D(L[])?

L[1]

IN

OUT

IN

OUT

IN

L[2]

OUT

OUT

OUT

OUT

OUT

L[3]

OUT

IN

IN

OUT

OUT

L[4]

OUT

IN

OUT

OUT

IN

...

Solvable Problems

All problems

The set of solvable problems is a proper subset of the set of all problems.

- Equal size infinite sets: bijections
- Countable and uncountable infinities

- More languages than algorithms
- Number of algorithms countably infinite
- Number of languages uncountably infinite
- Diagonalization technique
- Construct D(L[]) using infinite set of features

- The set of solvable problems is a proper subset of the set of all problems

- Topics
- Program behavior problems
- Input of problem is a program/algorithm
- Definition of type program

- Program correctness
- Testing versus Proving

- Program behavior problems

- These are problems where we investigate properties of numbers
- Primality
- Input: Positive integer n
- Yes/No Question: Is n a prime number?

- Divisor
- Input: Integers m,n
- Yes/No question: Is m a divisor of n?

- Primality

- These are problems where we investigate properties of graphs
- Connected
- Input: Graph G
- Yes/No Question: Is G a connected graph?

- Subgraph
- Input: Graphs G1 and G2
- Yes/No question: Is G1 a subgraph of G2?

- Connected

- These are problems where we investigate properties of programs and how they behave
- Give an example problem with one input program P
- Give an example problem with two input programs P1 and P2

- Program variables
- Abstractly, we define the type “program”
- graph G, program P

- More concretely, we define type program to be a string over the program alphabet SP = {a, …, z, A, …, Z, 0, …, 9, punctuation, white space}
- Note, many strings over SP are not legal programs
- We consider them to be programs that always crash

- Abstractly, we define the type “program”
- Possible declaration of main procedure
- bool main(program P)

- How do we determine whether or not a program P we have written is correct?
- What are some weaknesses of this approach?
- What might be a better approach?

Program

P

Analyzer

Test Inputs

x1

x2

x3

...

Outputs

P(x1)

P(x2)

P(x3)

...

Analysis of

Program P

Program P

- Correctness
- Input
- Program P

- Yes/No Question
- Does P correctly solve the primality problem?

- Input
- Functional Equivalence
- Input
- Programs P1, P2

- Yes/No Question
- Is program P1 functionally equivalent to program P2

- Input

- Halting Problem
- Fundamental program behavior problem
- A specific unsolvable problem
- Diagonalization technique revisited
- Proof more complex

- Input
- Program P
- Assume the input to program P is a single unsigned int
- This assumption is not necessary, but it simplifies the following unsolvability proof
- To see the full generality of the halting problem, remove this assumption

- Assume the input to program P is a single unsigned int
- Nonnegative integer x, an input for program P

- Program P
- Yes/No Question
- Does P halt when run on x?

- Notation
- Use H as shorthand for halting problem when space is a constraint

- Program with one input of type unsigned int
bool main(unsigned int Q) {

int i=2;

if ((Q = = 0) || (Q= = 1)) return false;

while (i<Q) {

if (Q%i = = 0) return (false);

i++;

}

return (true);

}

- Input x
4

Three key definitions

- SP* is countably infinite where SP = {characters, digits, white space, punctuation}
- Type program will be type string with SP as the alphabet
- Define L to be the strings in SP* listed in enumeration order
- length 0 strings first
- length 1 strings next
- …

- Every program is a string in SP
- For simplicity, consider only programs that have
- one input
- the type of this input is an unsigned int

- For simplicity, consider only programs that have
- Consider strings in SP* that are not legal programs to be programs that always crash (and thus halt on all inputs)

- If H is solvable, some program must solve H
- Let PH be a procedure which solves H
- We declare it as a procedure because we will use PH as a subroutine

- Declaration of PH
- bool PH(program P, unsigned int x)
- In general, the type of x should be the type of the input to P

- bool PH(program P, unsigned int x)
- Comments
- We do not know how PH works
- However, if H is solvable, we can build programs which call PH as a subroutine

bool main(unsigned int y) /* main for program D */

{ program P = generate(y);

if (PH(P,y)) while (1>0); else return (yes); }

/* generate the yth string in SP* in enumeration order */

program generate(unsigned int y)

/* code for program of slide 21 from module 5 did this for {a,b}* */

bool PH(program P, unsigned int x)

/* how PH solves H is unknown */

- We won’t go into this in detail here
- This was the basis of the question at the bottom of slide 21 of lecture 5 (alphabet for that problem was {a,b} instead of SP).
- This is the main place where our assumption about the input type for program P is important
- for other input types, how to do this would vary

- Specification
- 0 maps to program l
- 1 maps to program a
- 2 maps to program b
- 3 maps to program c
- …
- 26 maps to program z
- 27 maps to program A
- …

Proof that H is not solvable

H is NOT solvable

Definition of

Solvability

PH exists

PH does NOT exist

D’s code

D exists

D does NOT exist

L is list of

all programs

D is on list L

p

q is logically equivalent to (not q)

(not p)

H is solvable

D is NOT on list L

- Use list L to specify a program behavior B that is distinct from all real program behaviors (for programs with one input of type unsigned int)
- Diagonalization argument similar to the one for proving the number of languages over {a} is uncountably infinite
- No program P exists that exhibits program behavior B

- Argue that D exhibits program behavior B
- Thus D cannot exist and thus is not on list L

Non-existent program behavior B

Consider each number to be a feature

A program halts or doesn’t halt on each integer

We have a fixed L this time

H

H

H

H

H

H

NH

H

NH

H

NH

NH

NH

NH

NH

NH

H

H

NH

NH

H

H

H

H

H

0

1

2

3

4

...

- #Rows is countably infinite
- Sp* is countably infinite

- #Cols is countably infinite
- Set of nonnegative integers is countably infinite

P0

P1

P2

P3

P4

...

- We specify a non-existent program behavior B by using a unique feature
- (number) to differentiate B from Pi

0

B

1

2

3

4

...

P0

NH

H

H

H

H

H

P1

H

NH

H

H

NH

H

P2

NH

NH

NH

H

NH

NH

P3

NH

H

H

NH

H

NH

P4

NH

H

H

H

H

H

...

Arguing D exhibits program behavior B

bool main(unsigned int y) /* main for program D */

{ program P = generate(y);

if (PH(P,y)) while (1>0); else return (yes); }

/* generate the yth string in SP* in enumeration order */

program generate(unsigned int y)

/* code for extra credit program of slide 21 from lecture 5 did this for {a,b}* */

bool PH(program P, unsigned int x)

/* how PH solves H is unknown */

- Program D with input y
- (type for y: unsigned int)
Given input y, generate the program (string) Py

Run PH on Py and y

- Guaranteed to halt since PH solves H
IF (PH(Py,y)) while (1>0); else return (yes);

- Guaranteed to halt since PH solves H

- (type for y: unsigned int)

0

...

y

D

1

2

...

P0

H

H

H

P1

H

NH

H

P2

NH

NH

NH

...

NH

H

Py

...

Alternate Proof

- For every program Py, there is a number y that we associate with it
- The number we use to distinguish program Py from D is this number y
- Using this idea, we can arrive at a contradiction without explicitly using the table L
- The diagonalization is hidden

- Assume H is solvable
- Let PH be the program which solves H
- Use PH to construct program D which cannot exist

- Contradiction
- This means program PH cannot exist.
- This implies H is not solvable

- D is the same as before

- If D is a program, it must have an associated number y
- What does D do on this number y?
- 2 cases
- D halts on y
- This means PH(D,y) = NO
- Definition of D

- This means D does not halt on y
- PH solves H

- Contradiction
- This case is not possible

- This means PH(D,y) = NO

- D halts on y

- D does not halt on this number y
- This means PH(D,y) = YES
- Definition of D

- This means D halts on y
- PH solves H

- Contradiction
- This case is not possible

- This means PH(D,y) = YES
- Both cases are not possible, but one must be for D to exist
- Thus D cannot exist

- The Halting Problem is one of the simplest problems we can formulate about program behavior
- We can use the fact that it is unsolvable to show that other problems about program behavior are also unsolvable
- This has important implications restricting what we can do in the field of software engineering
- In particular, “perfect” debuggers/testers do not exist
- We are forced to “test” programs for correctness even though this approach has many flaws

- Halting Problem definition
- Basic problem about program behavior

- Halting Problem is unsolvable
- We have identified a specific unsolvable problem
- Diagonalization technique
- Proof more complicated because we actually need to construct D, not just give a specification B

- Closure Properties
- Definition
- Language class definition
- set of languages

- Closure properties and first-order logic statements
- For all, there exists

- A set is closed under an operation if applying the operation to elements of the set produces another element of the set
- Example/Counterexample
- set of integers and addition
- set of integers and division

2

5

7

Integers

.4

2

5

Integers

- We will be interested in closure properties of language classes
- A language class is a set of languages
- Thus, the elements of a language class (set of languages) are languages which are sets themselves

- Crucial Observation
- When we say that a language class is closed under some set operation, we apply the set operation to the languages (elements of the language classes) rather than the language classes themselves

- In all these examples, we do not explicitly state what the underlying alphabet S is
- Finite languages
- Languages with a finite number of strings

- CARD-3
- Languages with at most 3 strings

{0,1,00}

{0,1,11}

{0,1,00,11}

Finite Sets

{0,1,00}

{0,1,11}

{0,1,00,11}

CARD-3

CARD-3: sets with at most 3 elements

{/\,00,10,11,000,...}

{0,1,01}

Finite Sets

- A closure property often represents an infinite number of facts
- Example: The set of finite languages is closed under the set union operation
- {} union {} is a finite language
- {} union {l} is a finite language
- {} union {0} is a finite language
- ...
- {l} union {} is a finite language
- ...

- A way to formally write (not prove) a closure property
- For all L1, ...,Lk in LC, op (L1, ... Lk) in LC
- Only one expression is needed because of the for all quantifier

- Number of languages k is determined by arity of the operation op

- For all L1,L2 in FINITE, L1 union L2 in FINITE
- For all L1,L2 in CARD-3, L1 union L2 in CARD-3
- For all L in FINITE, Lc in FINITE
- For all L in CARD-3, Lc in CARD-3

- What is true if a set is not closed under some k-ary operator?
- There exist k elements of that set which, when combined together under the given operator, produce an element not in the set
- There exists L1, ...,Lk in LC, op (L1, …, Lk) not in LC

- Example
- Finite sets and set complement

- Complement “For all L1,L2 in CARD-3, L1 union L2 in CARD-3”
- not (For all L1,L2 in CARD-3, L1 union L2 in CARD-3)
- There exists L1,L2 in CARD-3, not (L1 union L2 in CARD-3)
- There exists L1,L2 in CARD-3, L1 union L2notin CARD-3

- Which is easier and why?
- Proving a closure property is true
- Proving a closure property is false

- Recursive and r.e. language classes
- representing solvable and half-solvable problems

- Proofs of closure properties
- for the set of recursive (solvable) languages
- for the set of r.e. (half-solvable) languages

- Generic element/template proof technique
- Relationship between RE and REC
- pseudoclosure property

- REC
- A solvable language is commonly referred to as a recursive language for historical reasons
- REC is defined to be the set of solvable or recursive languages

- RE
- A half-solvable language is commonly referred to as a recursively enumerable or r.e. language
- RE is defined to be the set of r.e. or half-solvable languages

- It tests how well we really understand the concepts we encounter
- language classes, REC, solvability, half-solvability

- It highlights the concept of subroutines and how we can build on previous algorithms to construct new algorithms
- we don’t have to build our algorithms from scratch every time

- Setting
- I have two programs which can solve the language recognition problems for L1 and L2
- I want a program which solves the language recognition problem for L1 intersect L2

- Question
- Do I need to develop a new program from scratch or can I use the existing programs to help?
- Does this depend on which languages L1 and L2 I am working with?

- Do I need to develop a new program from scratch or can I use the existing programs to help?

- We now prove REC is closed under two set operations
- Set Complement
- Set Intersection

- In these proofs, we try to highlight intuition and common sense

- Even: the set of even length strings over {0,1}
- Complement of Even?
- Odd: the set of odd length strings over {0,1}

- Is Odd recursive (solvable)?
- How is the program P’ that solves Odd related to the program P that solves Even?

- If L is a solvable language, then L complement is a solvable language
- Proof
- Let L be an arbitrary solvable language
- First line comes from For all L in REC

- Let P be the C++ program which solves L
- P exists by definition of REC

- Let L be an arbitrary solvable language

- Modify P to form P’ as follows
- Identical except at very end
- Complement answer
- Yes -> No
- No -> Yes

- Program P’ solves L complement
- Halts on all inputs
- Answers correctly

- Thus L complement is solvable
- Definition of solvable

P’

No

YES

YES

P

Input x

No

bool main(string y)

{

if (P(y)) return no; else return yes;

}

bool P(string y)

/* details deleted; key fact is P is guaranteed to halt on all inputs */

- Even: the set of even length strings over {0,1}
- Mod-5: the set of strings of length a multiple of 5 over {0,1}
- What is Even intersection Mod-5?
- Mod-10: the set of strings of length a multiple of 10 over {0,1}

- How is the program P3 (Mod-10) related to programs P1 (Even) and P2 (Mod-5)

- If L1 and L2 are solvable languages, then L1 intersection L2 is a solvable language
- Proof
- Let L1 and L2 be arbitrary solvable languages
- Let P1 and P2 be programs which solve L1 and L2, respectively

- Construct program P3 from P1 and P2 as follows
- P3 runs both P1 and P2 on the input string
- If both say yes, P3 says yes
- Otherwise, P3 says no

- P3 solves L1 intersection L2
- Halts on all inputs
- Answers correctly

- L1 intersection L2 is a solvable language

Yes/No

P3

AND

Yes/No

P1

Yes/No

P2

bool main(string y)

{

if (P1(y) && P2(y)) return yes;

else return no;

}

bool P1(string y) /* details deleted; key fact is P1 always halts. */

bool P2(string y) /* details deleted; key fact is P2 always halts. */

- Unary Operations
- Language Reversal
- Kleene Star

- Binary Operations
- Set Union
- Set Difference
- Symmetric Difference
- Concatenation

- We now try to prove RE is closed under the same two set operations
- Set Intersection
- Set Complement

- In these proofs
- We define a more formal proof methodology
- We gain more intuition about the differences between solvable and half-solvable problems

- Expressing this closure property as an infinite set of facts
- Let Li denote the ith r.e. language
- L1 intersect L1 is in RE
- L1 intersect L2 is in RE
- ...
- L2 intersect L1 is in RE
- ...

- Let Li denote the ith r.e. language

- Since there are an infinite number of facts to prove, we cannot prove them all individually
- Instead, we create a single proof that proves each fact simultaneously
- I like to call these proofs generic element or template proofs

- Name your generic objects
- In this case, we use L1 and L2

- Only use facts which apply to any relevant objects
- We will only use the fact that there must exist P1 and P2 which half-solve L1 and L2

- Work from both ends of the proof
- The first and last lines are usually obvious, and we can often work our way in

- Let L1 and L2 be arbitrary r.e. languages

- There exist P1 and P2 s.t. Y(P1)=L1 and Y(P2)=L2
- By definition of half-solvable languages

- Construct program P3 from P1 and P2
- Note, we can assume very little about P1 and P2

- Prove Program P3 half-solves L1 intersection L2

- There exists a program P which half-solves L1 intersection L2

- L1 intersection L2 is an r.e. language

- Run P1 and P2 in parallel
- One instruction of P1, then one instruction of P2, and so on

- If both halt and say yes, halt and say yes
- If both halt but both do not say yes, halt and say no

Yes/No/-

Input

P3

AND

Yes/No/-

P1

Yes/No/-

P2

bool main(string y){

parallel-execute(P1(y), P2(y)) until both return;

if ((P1(y) && P2(y)) return yes;

else return no;

}

bool P1(string y)

/* key fact is P1 only guaranteed to halt on yes input instances */

bool P2(string y)

/* key fact is P2 only guaranteed to halt on yes input instances */

- 2 steps to showing P3 half-solves L1 intersection L2
- For all x in L1 intersection L2, must show P3
- accepts x
- halts and says yes

- accepts x
- For all x not in L1 intersection L2, must show P3 does what?

- For all x in L1 intersection L2, must show P3

- P3 accepts x in L1 intersection L2
- Let x be an arbitrary string in L1 intersection L2
- Note, this subproof is a generic element proof

- P1 accepts x
- L1 intersection L2 is a subset of L1
- P1 accepts all strings in L1

- P2 accepts x
- P3 accepts x
- We reach the AND gate because of the 2 previous facts
- Since both P1 and P2 accept, AND evaluates to YES

- Let x be an arbitrary string in L1 intersection L2

- P3 does not accept x not in L1 intersection L2
- Let x be an arbitrary string not in L1 intersection L2
- By definition of intersection, this means x is not in L1 or L2
- Case 1: x is not in L1
- 2 possibilities
- P1 rejects (or crashes on) x
- One input to AND gate is No
- Output cannot be yes
- P3 does not accept x

- P1 loops on x
- One input never reaches AND gate
- No output
- P3 loops on x

- P3 does not accept x when x is not in L1

- Case 2: x is not in L2
- Essentially identical analysis

- P3 does not accept x not in L1 intersection L2

- First-order logic formulation?
- What this really means
- Let Li denote the ith r.e. language
- L1 complement is in RE
- L2 complement is in RE
- ...

- Let Li denote the ith r.e. language

- Let L be an arbitrary r.e. language

- There exists P s.t. Y(P)=L
- By definition of r.e. languages

- Construct program P’ from P
- Note, we can assume very little about P

- Prove Program P’ half-solves L complement

- There exists a program P’ which half-solves L complement

- L complement is an r.e. language

- What did we do in recursive case?
- Run P and then just complement answer at end
- Accept -> Reject
- Reject -> Accept

- Run P and then just complement answer at end
- Does this work in this case?
- No. Why not?

- Does this prove that RE is not closed under set complement?

- Unary Operations
- Language reversal
- Kleene Closure

- Binary operations
- union (on practice hw)
- concatenation

- Not closed
- Set difference (on practice hw)

- How can we use closure properties to prove a language LT is r.e. or recursive?
- Unary operator op (e.g. complement)
- 1) Find a known r.e. or recursive language L
- 2) Show LT = L op

- Binary operator op (e.g. intersection)
- 1) Find 2 known r.e or recursive languages L1 and L2
- 2) Show LT = L1 op L2

- How can we use closure properties to prove a language LT is notr.e. orrecursive?
- Unary operator op (e.g. complement)
- 1) Find a known not r.e. or non-recursive language L
- 2) Show LT op = L

- Binary operator op (e.g. intersection)
- 1) Find a known r.e. or recursive language L1
- 2) Find a known not r.e. or non-recursive language L2
- 3) Show L2 = L1 op LT

- Looping Problem
- Input
- Program P
- Input x for program P

- Yes/No Question
- Does P loop on x?

- Input
- Looping Problem is unsolvable
- Looping Problem complement = H

- Proving a new closure property
- Theorem: Unsolvable languages are closed under set complement
- Let L be an arbitrary unsolvable language
- If Lc is solvable, then L is solvable
- (Lc)c = L
- Solvable languages closed under complement

- However, we are assuming that L is unsolvable
- Therefore, we can conclude that Lc is unsolvable
- Thus, unsolvable languages are closed under complement

- Lemma: If L and Lc are half-solvable, then L is solvable.
- Question: What about Lc?

- Let L be an arbitrary language where L and Lc are both half-solvable
- Let P1 and P2 be the programs which half-solve L and Lc, respectively
- Construct program P3 from P1 and P2
- Argue P3 solves L

- L is solvable

- Problem
- Both P1 and P2 may loop on some input strings, and we need P3 to halt on all input strings

- Key Observation
- On all input strings, one of P1 and P2 is guaranteed to halt. Why?

L

Lc

P1 halts

P2 halts

S*

- P3’s Operation
- Run P1 and P2 in parallel on the input string x until one accepts x
- Guaranteed to occur given previous argument
- Also, only one program will accept any string x

- IF P1 is the accepting machine THEN yes ELSE no

- Run P1 and P2 in parallel on the input string x until one accepts x

Yes

Input

P3

No

Yes

P1

Yes

P2

bool main(string y)

{

parallel-execute(P1(y), P2(y)) until one returns yes;

if (P1(y)) return yes;

if (P2(Y)) return no;

}

bool P1(string y) /* guaranteed to halt on strings in L*/

bool P2(string y) /* guaranteed to halt on strings in Lc */

REC

L

Lc

All Languages

RE

REC

L

Lc

Lc

Lc

All Languages

RE

Are there any languages L in RE - REC?

- Universal Algorithms
- moving beyond one problem at a time
- operating system/general purpose computer

- So far, each program solves one specific problem
- Divisor
- Sorting
- Multiplication
- Language L

- Universal Problem (nonstandard term)
- Input
- Program P
- Input x to program P

- Task
- Compute P(x)

- Input
- Univeral Program
- Program which solves universal problem
- Universal Turing machine

- Program which solves universal problem

int main(A[6]) { Input

int i,temp;

for (i=1;i<=3;i++)A[1] = 6

if (A[i] > A[i+3]) {A[2] =4

temp = A[i+3];A[3] = 2

A[i+3] = A[i];A[4] = 3

A[i] = temp;A[5] = 5

}A[6] = 1

for (i=1; i<=5; i++)

for (j=i+1;j<=6;j++)

if (A[j-1] > A[j]) {

temp = A[j];

A[j] = A[j-1];

A[j-1] = temp;

}

}

Program P

Program P’s Memory

Program Counter

Universal Program’s Memory

Program P

int main(A[6]){

int i,temp;

for (i=1;i<=3;i++)

if (A[i] > A[i+3]) {

temp = A[i+3];

A[i+3] = A[i];

A[i] = temp;

}

for (i=1; i<=5; i++)

for (j=i+1;j<=6;j++)

if (A[j-1] > A[j]) {

temp = A[j];

A[j] = A[j-1];

A[j-1] = temp;

}

}

6

4

2

5

3

1

int A[6],i,temp;

Line 1

- Basic Loop
- Find current line of program P
- Execute current line of program P
- Update program P’s memory

- Update program counter
- Return to Top of Loop

- Turing came up with the concept of a universal program (Universal Turing machine) in the 1930’s
- This is well before the invention of the general purpose computer
- People were still thinking of computing devices as special-purpose devices (calculators, etc.)
- Turing helped move people beyond this narrow perspective

- Turing/Von Neumann perspective
- Computers are general purpose/universal algorithms
- Focused on computation
- Stand-alone

- Computers are general purpose/universal algorithms
- Today, we are moving beyond this view
- Computation, communication, cyberspace
- However, results in Turing perspective still relevant

- Halting Problem is half-solvable
- Modified Universal Program (MUP) half-solves H
Run P on x

Output yes

- This step only executed if first step halts

- Modified Universal Program (MUP) half-solves H
- Behavior
- What does MUP do on all yes instances of H?
- What does MUP do on all no inputs of H?

- How are debugger’s like gdb or ddd related to universal programs?
- How do debuggers simplify the debugging process?

- We now have a problem that is half-solvable but not solvable
- What do we now know about the complement of the Halting Problem?
- What additional fact about RE and set complement does this prove?

H

REC

Hc

All Languages

RE

- Universal Programs
- 1930’s, Turing
- Introduces general purpose computing concept
- Not a super intelligent program, merely a precise follower of instructions

- Halting Problem half-solvable but not solvable
- RE not closed under set complement

- Proving more specific problems are not solvable
- Input transformation technique
- Use subroutine theme to show that if one problem is unsolvable, so is a second problem
- Need to clearly differentiate between
- use of program as a subroutine and
- a program being an input to another program

Basic Idea/Technique

- Assume PL is a procedure that solves problem L
- We have no idea how PL solves L

- Construct a program PH that solves H using PL as a subroutine
- We use PL as a black box
- (We could use any unsolvable problem in place of H)

- Argue PH solves H
- Conclude that L is unsolvable
- Otherwise PL would exist and then H would be solvable
- L will be a problem about program behavior

- In this module, we will typically use H, the Halting Problem, as our known unsolvable problem
- The technique generalizes to using any unsolvable problem L’ in place of H.
- You would need to change the proofs to work with L’ instead of H, but in general it can be done

- The technique also can be applied to solvable problems to derive alternative consequences
- We focus on H to simplify the explanation

Constructing PH using PL

Answer-preserving input transformations and Program PT

- There are many ways to construct PH using program PL that solves L
- We focus on one method in which PH consists of two subroutines
- Procedure PL that solves L
- Procedure PT which computes a function f that I call an answer-preserving (or answer-reversing) input transformation
- More about this in a moment

PT(x)

x

PT

Y/N

Yes/No

PL

PH

- Input
- An input to H

- Output
- An input to L such that
- yes inputs of H map to yes inputs of L
- no inputs of H map to no inputs of L

- An input to L such that
- Note, PT must not loop when given any legal input to H

yes input to H

PT

yes input to L

yes

PL

no

no input to H

no input to L

PH

We have assumed that PL solves L

- Input
- An input to H

- Output
- An input to L such that
- yes inputs of H map to no inputs of L
- no inputs of H map to yes inputs of L

- An input to L such that
- Note, PT must not loop when given any legal input to H

yes input to H

PT

no input to L

no

yes

PL

no

no input to H

yes input to L

yes

PH

We have assumed that PL solves L

x

PT(x)

Yes/No

PL

PT

PH

No inputs

for H

Yes inputs

for H

Domain of H

Yes inputs

for L

No inputs

for L

Domain of L

Yes inputs

No inputs

Domain of H

Yes inputs

No inputs

Domain of L

- If there is such an answer-preserving (or answer-reversing) input transformation f (and the corresponding program PT), we say that H transforms to (many-one reduces to) L
- Notation
H ≤ L

Examples not involving the Halting Problem

- As noted earlier, while we focus on transforming H to other problems, the concept of transformation generalizes beyond H and beyond unsolvable program behavior problems
- We work with some solvable, language recognition problems to illustrate some aspects of the transformation process in the next few slides

Yes inputs

No inputs

Domain of L1

Yes inputs

No inputs

Domain of L2

- L1 is the set of even length strings over {0,1}
- What are the set of legal input instances and no inputs for the L1 LRP?

- L2 is the set of odd length strings over {0,1}
- Same question as above

- Tasks
- Give an answer-preserving input transformation f that shows that L1 LRP ≤ L2 LRP
- Give a corresponding program PT that computes f

string main(string x)

{

return(x concatenate “0”);

}

Yes inputs

No inputs

Domain of L1

Yes inputs

No inputs

Domain of L2

- L1 is the set of all strings over {0,1}
- What is the set of all inputs, yes inputs, no inputs for the L1 LRP?

- L2 is {0}
- Same question as above

- Tasks
- Give an answer-preserving input transformation f which shows that the L1 LRP ≤ L2 LRP
- Give a corresponding program PT which computes f

string main(string x)

{

return( “0”);

}

Yes inputs

No inputs

Domain of L1

Yes inputs

No inputs

Domain of L2

- L1
- Input: Java program P that takes as input an unsigned int
- Yes/No Question: Does P halt on all legal inputs

- L2
- Input: C++ program P that takes as input an unsigned int
- Yes/No Question: Does P halt on all legal inputs

- Tasks
- Describe what an answer-preserving input transformation f that shows that L1 ≤ L2 would be/do?

Proving a program behavior problem L is unsolvable

Halting Problem H

Input

Program QH that has one input of type unsigned int

non-negative integer y that is input to program QH

Yes/No Question

Does QH halt on y?

Target Problem L

Input

Program QL that has one input of type string

Yes/No question

Does Y(QL) = the set of even length strings?

Assume program PL solves L

PT(x)

x

PT

Y/N

Yes/No

PL

PH

- We are building a program PH to solve the halting problem H

- PH will use PL as a subroutine, and we have no idea
- how PL accomplishes its task

- PH will use PT as a subroutine, and we must explicitly
- construct PT using specific properties of H and L

- Programs which are PART of program PH and thus “executed” when PH executes
- Program PT, an actual program we construct
- Program PL, an assumed program which solves problem L

- Programs which are INPUTS/OUTPUTS of programs PH, PL, and PT and which are not “executed” when PH executes
- Programs QH, QL, and QYL
- code for QYL is available to PT

- Programs QH, QL, and QYL

Target Problem L

Input

Program Q that has one input of type string

Yes/No question

Does Y(Q) = the set of even length strings?

Program PL

Solves L

We don’t know how

Consider the following program Q1

bool main(string z)

{while (1>0) ;}

What does PL output when given Q1 as input?

Consider the following program Q2

bool main(string z)

{ if ((z.length %2) = = 0) return (yes)

else return (no); }

What does PL output when given Q2 as input?

Target Problem L

Input

Program Q that has one input of type string

Yes/No question

Does Y(Q) = the set of even length strings?

Program PL

Solves L

We don’t know how

Consider the following program QL with 2 procedures Q1 and QYL

bool main(string z) {

Q1(5); /* ignore return value */

return(QYL(z));

}

bool Q1(unsigned x) {

if (x > 3) return (no); else loop;

}

bool QYL(string y) {

if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes); else return(no);

}

What does PL output when given QL as input?

Input of PT

(Also Input of H)

Program QH

one input of type unsigned int

Non-negative integer y

Program QL that is the output of PT

(Also input of L)

bool main(string z) {

QH(y); /* QH and y come left-hand side */

/* ignore return value */

return(QYL(z));

}

bool QH(unsigned x) {

/* comes from left-hand side

}

bool QYL(string y) {

if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes); else return(no);

}

PT

QH,y

QL

PT

QH,y

QL

Input to PT

Program QH

bool main(unsigned y) {

if (y ==5) return yes;

else if (y ==4) return no;

else while (1>0) {};

}

Input y

5

Output of PT

Program QL

bool QH(unsigned y) {

if (y ==5) return yes;

else if (y ==4) return no;

else while (1>0) {};

}

bool QYL(string z) {

if ((z.length % 2) == 0) return (yes) else return (no);

}

bool main(string z) {

unsigned y = 5;

QH(y);

return (QYL(z));

}

PT

QH,y

QL

Input to PT

Program QH

bool main(unsigned y) {

if (y ==5) return yes;

else if (y ==4) return no;

else while (1>0) {};

}

Input y

3

Output of PT

Program QL

bool QH(unsigned y) {

if (y ==5) return yes;

else if (y ==4) return no;

else while (1>0) {};

}

bool QYL(string z) {

if ((z.length % 2) == 0) return (yes) else return (no);

}

bool main(string z) {

unsigned y = 3;

QH(y);

return (QYL(z));

}

PT in more detail

QH,y

QL

Yes/No

PL

PT

PH

- What is the return type of PT?
- Type program1 (with one input of type string)

- What are the input parameters of PT?
- The same as the input parameters to H; in this case,
- type program2 (with one input of type unsigned int)
- unsigned int (input type to program2)
program1 main(program2 QH, unsigned y)

- The same as the input parameters to H; in this case,

Code for PT

QH,y

QL

Yes/No

PL

PT

PH

program1 main(program2 P, unsigned y) {

/* Will be viewing types program1 and program2 as STRINGS over the program alphabet SP */

program1 QL = replace-main-with-QH(P);

/* Insert line break */

QL += “\n”;

/* Insert QYL */

QL += “bool QYL(string z) {\n \t if ((z.length % 2) == 0) return (yes) else return (no);\n }”;

/* Add main routine of QL */

QL += “bool main(string z) {\n\t”; /* determined by L */

QL += “unsigned y =”

QL += convert-to-string(y);

QL += “;\n\t QH(y)\n\t return(QYL(z));\n}”;

return(QL);

}

program1 replace-main-with-QH(program2 P) /* Details hidden */

string convert-to-string(unsigned y) /* Details hidden */

QH,y

QL

Yes/No

PL

PT

PH

PT

code

for QYL

Y/N

QYL

y

start

halt

QH

QL

QH

z

QYL

PT

Y/N

unsigned y

Program QH

bool main(unsigned y) {

if (y ==5) return yes;

else if (y ==4) return no;

else while (1>0) {};

}

Input y

5

Program QL

bool QH(unsigned y) {

if (y ==5) return yes;

else if (y ==4) return no;

else while (1>0) {};

}

bool QYL(string z) {

if ((z.length % 2) == 0) return (yes) else return (no);

}

bool main(string z) {

unsigned y = 5;

QH(y);

return (QYL(z));

}

Constructing QL (and thus PT)

How to choose QYL or QNL

If QH, y is a no input to the Halting problem

Program QL

bool main(string z) {

QH(y); /* ignore return value */

return(Q?L(z)); /* yes or no? */

}

bool QH(unsigned x) {

/* comes from left-hand side

}

bool Q?L(string y) {

}

- QHloops on y

- Thus Y(QL) = {}

- Determine if this makes QL a no or yes input instance to L

If QH, y is a no input to the Halting problem

- Now choose a QYL (or QNL) that is a yes (or no) input instance to L

- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {
- /* comes from left-hand side

- }
- bool QYL(string y) {
- }

- bool main(string z) {

- QHloops on y

- Thus Y(QL) = {}

- Determine if this makes QL a no or yes input instance to L

If QH, y is a no input to the Halting problem

- Now choose a QYL (or QNL) that is a yes (or no) input instance to L

- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {
- /* comes from left-hand side

- }
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- bool main(string z) {

- QHloops on y

- Thus Y(QL) = {}

- Determine if this makes QL a no or yes input instance to L

- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes */
- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {
- /* comes from left-hand side

- }
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- if ((z.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {
- /* comes from left-hand side

- }

Another Example

Halting Problem H

Input

Program QH that has one input of type unsigned int

non-negative integer y that is input to program QH

Yes/No Question

Does QH halt on y?

Target Problem L

Input

Program QL that has one input of type string

Yes/No question

Is Y(QL) finite?

Assume program PL solves L

If QH, y is a no input to the Halting problem

Program QL

bool main(string z) {

QH(y); /* ignore return value */

return(Q?L(z)); /* yes or no? */

}

bool QH(unsigned x) {

/* comes from left-hand side

}

bool Q?L(string y) {

}

- QHloops on y

- Thus Y(QL) = {}

- Determine if this makes QL a no or yes input instance to L

If QH, y is a no input to the Halting problem

Program QL

bool main(string z) {

QH(y); /* ignore return value */

return(QNL(z));/* no */

}

bool QH(unsigned x) {

/* comes from left-hand side

}

bool QNL(string y) {

}

- Now choose a QYL (or QNL) that is a yes (or no) input instance to L

- QHloops on y

- Thus Y(QL) = {}

- Determine if this makes QL a no or yes input instance to L

If QH, y is a no input to the Halting problem

Program QL

bool main(string z) {

QH(y); /* ignore return value */

return(QNL(z));/* no */

}

bool QH(unsigned x) {

/* comes from left-hand side

}

bool QNL(string y) {

if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return(yes);

else return(no);

}

- Now choose a QYL (or QNL) that is a yes (or no) input instance to L

- QHloops on y

- Thus Y(QL) = {}

- Determine if this makes QL a no or yes input instance to L

Analyzing proposed transformations

4 possibilities

- Input of Transformation
- Program QH, unsigned x

- Output of Transformation
- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes or no */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {}
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- Problem L
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) = {aa}?

- Question: Is the transformation on the left an answer-preserving or answer-reversing input transformation from H to problem L?

- Input of Transformation
- Program QH, unsigned x

- Output of Transformation
- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes or no */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {}
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- Problem L
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) = {aa}?

- The output of the transformation is the input to the problem.
- Plug QL in for program P above
- Is Y(QL) = {aa}?

- Input of Transformation
- Program QH, unsigned x

- Output of Transformation
- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes or no */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {}
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- Problem L
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) = {aa}?

- Analysis
- If QH loops on x, Y(QL)={}
- No input to H creates a QL that is a no input for L
- If QH halts on x, Y(QL) = {even length strings}
- Yes input to H creates a QL that is a no input for L

- Transformation does not work
- All inputs map to no inputs

- Input of Transformation
- Program QH, unsigned x

- Output of Transformation
- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes or no */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {}
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- Problem L1
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) infinite?

- Problem L2
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) finite?

- Problem L3
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) = {} or is Y(P) infinite?

- Input of Transformation
- Program QH, unsigned x

- Output of Transformation
- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes or no */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {}
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- Problem L1
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) infinite?

- Analysis
- If QH loops on x, Y(QL)={}
- No input to H creates a QL that is a no input for L
- If QH halts on x, Y(QL) = {even length strings}
- Yes input to H creates a QL that is a yes input for L

- Transformation works
- Answer-preserving

- Input of Transformation
- Program QH, unsigned x

- Output of Transformation
- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes or no */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {}
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- Problem L2
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) finite?

- Analysis
- If QH loops on x, Y(QL)={}
- No input to H creates a QL that is a yes input for L
- If QH halts on x, Y(QL) = {even length strings}
- Yes input to H creates a QL that is a no input for L

- Transformation works
- Answer-reversing

- Input of Transformation
- Program QH, unsigned x

- Output of Transformation
- Program QL
- bool main(string z) {
- QH(y); /* ignore return value */
- return(QYL(z)); /* yes or no */

- }
- bool QH(unsigned x) {}
- bool QYL(string y) {
- if ((y.length( ) % 2) = = 0) return (yes);
- else return (no);
- }

- Problem L3
- Input: Program P
- Yes/No Question: Is Y(P) = {} or is Y(P) infinite?

- Analysis
- If QH loops on x, Y(QL)={}
- No input to H creates a QL that is a yes input for L
- If QH halts on x, Y(QL) = {even length strings}
- Yes input to H creates a QL that is a yes input for L

- Transformation does not work
- All inputs map to yes inputs