1 / 22

The Effects of the Crisis in Social Security Systems ACTRAV – ETUI Torino 03/09/2009

The Effects of the Crisis in Social Security Systems ACTRAV – ETUI Torino 03/09/2009. Fabio Durán Valverde Jesús García Jiménez. BENEFICTS BASED ON THE FAMILY. SOCIAL CONTROL OF THE MANAGEMENT TRIPARTISM - PARTICIPATION C102-121-128-130-168.

jane-mcgee
Download Presentation

The Effects of the Crisis in Social Security Systems ACTRAV – ETUI Torino 03/09/2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Effects of the Crisis in Social Security SystemsACTRAV – ETUITorino 03/09/2009 Fabio Durán Valverde Jesús García Jiménez

  2. BENEFICTS BASED ON THE FAMILY SOCIAL CONTROL OF THE MANAGEMENT TRIPARTISM - PARTICIPATION C102-121-128-130-168 A FULL HEALTH CARE FOR THE WHOLE FAMILY, And right to economic benefits in illness situations. C. 102 – 130 – R134 Y 69 MATERNITY PROTECTION C. 183 R191 RIGHT FOR SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS OF PROTECTION TO FAMILY AND CHILDREN. C. 102

  3. BENEFICTS BASED ON THE JOB SOCIAL CONTROL OF THE MANAGEMENT TRIPARTISM - PARTICIPATION C102-121-128-130-168 RIGHT FOR SUFFICIENT PENSIONS (Retirement - Disability - Widowhood)C. 102 -128 – R131 RIGHT FOR HEALTH AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS   FOR WORK ACCIDENTS AND OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES C. 102 – 121 - R121 PROMOTION OF PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND RIGHT FOR UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS C. 102 -168 – R176

  4. COMPONENTS/PILLARS OF THEORETICAL SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM(Spanish model) COMPLEMENTARY AND FREE LEVEL PRIVATE (Or by collective bargaining) INDIVIDUALLY FUNDED SYSTEMS CONTRIBUTORY LEVEL Funded by the quotations from workers and Employers PAYGO SYSTEMS SOCIAL FLOOR NON CONTRIBUTORY BENEFICTS FUNDED BY TAXES (f.e: HEALTH CARE – NON CONTRIBUTORY PENSIONS)

  5. Implications of the crisis(diferent way ♀ y ♂) • Lower rates of economic growth • Recession in various countries • Increase in unemployment and underemployment rates (it is estimated 50 millions ) • Less employment opportunities • Probable increases in situations of precarious work • Impact on social security systems • Other impacts: poverty, inequality, social conflict, etc.

  6. Impact on social security systems(diferent way ♀ y ♂) • Reduction in the level of funds of systems that work under collective and individual capitalization – financial crisis • Increase in contributory evasion and delinquency – easy escape valve for enterprises – financial and economic crisis • Contraction of affiliation to social security in the formal and informal economy – employ crisis • Contraction of collection – economic and employ crisis • Reduction of substitution rates systems of individual accounts – between 10% and 30%, depending on the type of fund – financial crisis • Increase beneficts by unemployment, increase spending. Employ crisis • Reduction of the real cost of health – social security institutions – effects of quality and quantity of attention given

  7. Elements for discussion and analysis – an ILO position • Paygo Systems vs individually funded Systems: demographic risk versus financial risk • The sustainability of the system: aging and coverage • Individually funded Systems, of public or private administration, depends more on capitalization to guarantee certain levels of benefits. The crisis affects those systems that are most capitalized. • Social Security as a human right: Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Philadelphia Declaration. Nature and object of an instrument for protection. It is not about conventional financial instruments. They are not savings accounts.

  8. Elements for discussion and analysis – an ILO position (continuation) • Public nature of social security systems, independently from how they are financed and managed. • The system’s mission: provide protection. ILO’s position: “benefits must be secure and non-discriminatory”. The instruments must guarantee not only solidarity but SECURITY as well. • If individuals are obliged to forecast through contributions, the State must ensure the security of funds. The position of the ILO: ILC 2001. The State is the ultimate financial guarantor.

  9. Some data

  10. Nominal rentability to date of reserve funds selected OECD countries. Source ISSA

  11. Nominal rentability to date in pension funds selected by the OECD. Source: ISSA

  12. The most important social security problem in Latin America is low coverage…the crisis can decrease contributory coverage (%)

  13. Conclusion 13, International Labour Conference of the ILO, 2001 • "In the pension system with defined benefits based on the “paygo system”, the risk is assumed collectively. In systems of individual savings accounts, by contrast, are those people who take the risk. While this is an alternative that exists, this should not weaken solidarity, in which the risk is shared between all members of the scheme.”

  14. In facing the crisis, the state must play an important role ... and in facing with the structural problems of social security • The State as the ultimate financial guarantor. • Responsibility of the State and of its administrators, respect to transparency in providing information to members. Prohibit misleading information: rates of return and substitution rates. Responsibility of the institutions of regulation and supervision (Superintendents). The State must assume responsibility of minimal profitability for soon-to-be retirees and those people that dealt with changes in their retirement expectation, be it in in either in pension amounts and retirement age . • The State should assume responsibility for minimum return for people who are close to retirement who were abruptly changed their pension expectations, either in amounts of pensions or retirement ages. • Implement a means of ensuring a minimum return over the long term, collective and individual: guaranteed minimum return and minimum benefits.

  15. In facing the crisis, the State must assume an important role… (…continuation) Eliminate or regulate the instruments that compromise the security of benefits: “programmed rent”, “high-risk funds”, etc. Strengthen the pressure to combat tax evasion and improve coverage to pay ... or at least maintain the level of coverage during the crisis Facilitate the access and duration to unemployment benefits (where they exist) Minimize the impact on poverty. The crisis will greatly effect those whom do not have social protection. Basic floor for social protection - strengthen systems aimed to the poorest – creation or strengthening of assistance programmes.

  16. NORMAS INTERNACIONALES DEL TRABAJO SOBRE SEGURIDAD SOCIAL • Definen Quién tiene derecho a qué y en qué condiciones,es decir: Campo de aplicación, Prestaciones y Condiciones de acceso, para todas y cada una de las RAMAS DE LA SEGURIDAD SOCIAL, que según las Normas Internacionales de la OIT son: • Invalidez, Vejez y Muerte (o supervivencia) - C 102 partes V, IX y X  - C128  y R 131. • Salud (Asistencia Sanitaria y Prestaciones económicas) - C. 102 p.II y III; C130, R134 y R69. • Maternidad - C102 p. VIII; C 183, R191. • Accidentes de Trabajo y EE.PP - C102 p.VI; C121 y R121 • Desempleo - C102 p. IV; C168 y R176 • Prestaciones Familiares C.102 p.VII

  17. Group Work

  18. Group work • 1 - Identify and discuss the effects of the crisis on each of the pillars shown, by differentiating the size of the cause, be it financial, economic, or employment • 2 – Complete the paper, developed by a group of trade unionists in March, on "possible responses to the crisis from the social security” provided from each of the pillars.

  19. COMPONENTS/PILLARS OF THEORETICAL SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM(Spanish model) COMPLEMENTARY AND FREE LEVEL PRIVATE (Or by collective bargaining) INDIVIDUALLY FUNDED SYSTEMS CONTRIBUTORY LEVEL Funded by the quotations from workers and Employers PAYGO SYSTEMS SOCIAL FLOOR NON CONTRIBUTORY BENEFICTS FUNDED BY TAXES (f.e: HEALTH CARE – NON CONTRIBUTORY PENSIONS)

  20. MUCHAS GRACIAS! PREGUNTAS?

More Related