1 / 20

Preparing teachers to treat errors in the k-12 classroom

Preparing teachers to treat errors in the k-12 classroom. Dr. Dana Ferris University of California, Davis. objective. Provide a critical overview of what K-12 ESOL and content-area teachers of English learners need to know about treating student errors in writing. . Overview of module.

jamese
Download Presentation

Preparing teachers to treat errors in the k-12 classroom

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Preparing teachers to treat errors in the k-12 classroom Dr. Dana Ferris University of California, Davis

  2. objective • Provide a critical overview of what K-12 ESOL and content-area teachers of English learners need to know about treating student errors in writing.

  3. Overview of module • Provide research and perspectives on the usefulness of corrective feedback in second language writing • Understand types of errors made by English learners (ELs) • Understand how to respond to student errors and the issues surrounding corrective feedback • Suggest strategies, methods, and options for responding to student errors • Provide suggestions for aiding ELs’ development of academic language in writing

  4. Why this issue is important • High stakes tests are moving beyond multiple choice formats to include short, extended, and essay-response questions. • New national common core standards integrate literacy development in all content classes, stressing the importance of expository writing skills in content-area classes. • Teachers of English learners need to understand the issues unique to second language writing and how to appropriately address them.

  5. Understanding the issue • Background of corrective feedback • Is corrective feedback useful? • Types of corrective feedback

  6. What the research says • Errors are a normal part of language acquisition • ELs may stall (“fossilize”) in their acquisition of particular language structures • Expert intervention (feedback and instruction) can help ELs improve in written accuracy over time

  7. What types of errors l2 writers commonly make • Errors with nouns (articles, plurals) • Errors with verbs (tense, form) • Subject-verb agreement • Word choice • Sentence structure (word order, missing/extra words) • Errors also typical of native English speakers (punctuation, sentence boundaries, spelling, other mechanics)

  8. What errors to treat • Serious/global errors that impede readers’ comprehension • Patterns of frequent errors • Stigmatizing errors that cause readers to “label” the writer as “ESL”

  9. When to treat an error • Throughout the writing process, but with different emphases at various stages: • Early stages: general indications of 1-2 patterns of error to watch for (“As you revise, pay attention to plural endings on your nouns…”) • Intermediate stages: more detailed, text-specific feedback on several patterns of error • Final versions: feedback on remaining errors for student analysis and to monitor for future papers

  10. How should instructors treat errors • Strategies • Options for feedback

  11. Strategies • Direct feedback (teacher makes the correction) • Indirect feedback (teacher points out the error but asks student to make the correction) • Comprehensive feedback (correcting all errors you see) • Selective feedback (marking only patterns of several specific error types) • Explicit feedback (indicating error type and/or rule reminder) • Implicit feedback (underlining or highlighting error)

  12. options • Selective feedback early in writing process; comprehensive feedback on final drafts (for future reference) • Reduce amount of teacher feedback as term progresses; require more student involvement • Use peer- and self-editing workshops in class to build student autonomy • Combine direct/indirect feedback (e.g., direct feedback for lexical errors such as prepositions, indirect for errors students should be able to correct) • More direct feedback for lower-proficiency learners; more indirect feedback for advanced learners • Ask students to revise/rewrite texts and/or complete reflection/analysis exercises after receiving corrections

  13. Developing l2 students’ academic language • Vocabulary • Grammar • Style • Developing independence in writing • Self-editing strategies for ELs

  14. Vocabulary development • Teach vocabulary analysis strategies through classroom intensive reading activities • Require and facilitate extensive reading • Encourage or require self-directed vocabulary learning (note cards or journals) • Help students understand the importance of accurate and effective lexical choices in writing • Teach students to analyze and revise vocabulary choices in their own writing

  15. Grammar instruction • Teach mini-lessons on patterns of error common to the whole class • Go beyond “error”: Build awareness and control of grammatical structures elicited by specific writing tasks (e.g., tense shifts for narratives, appropriate use of passive voice) • Follow any grammar instruction with immediate application to students’ own writing (peer- and self-editing workshops)

  16. style • Work on writing style with more advanced learners who have generally good linguistic control/repertoires • Discuss register, genre, and audience in relation to specific writing tasks • Teach basic distinctions between casual and formal writing styles (e.g., use of contractions, first/second person, “casual” punctuation such as dashes or parentheses, use of sentence fragments) • Help students become aware of vocabulary choices considered informal or cliché

  17. autonomy • Raise awareness about the effects of error on real-world audiences • Emphasize the importance of attending to accuracy, especially in final stages of text production • Include accountability mechanisms (through grading) and follow-up (reflection/analysis activities, rewriting/revision, charting, etc.) • Teach self-editing strategies (next)

  18. Strategies for self-editing • Proofreading • Using word-processing tools effectively • Reading aloud • Adequate time & distance from writing content • Analyzing word choice, sentence structure, and style • Other editors (working effectively with peers and other readers) • Awareness of weaknesses/error patterns; independent study & practice resources

  19. Conclusion • Accurate and effective use of language is a critical element of successful writing • Most ELs have not had enough exposure to language/text to have complete control of structure/mechanics • Carefully provided feedback and instruction can empower students and build their confidence • Teachers may need to study grammar/language and writing pedagogy to provide feedback and instruction effectively

  20. references • Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge. • Ferris, D.R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd Ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. • Folse, K.S. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. • Hedgcock, J.S., & Ferris, D.R. (2009). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts. New York: Routledge. • Reid, J.M. (Ed.) (2008). Writing myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

More Related