Corpora in assessing students writing
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 26

Corpora in assessing students’ writing PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 59 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Corpora in assessing students’ writing. Elena Tarasheva, PhD New Bulgarian University. Conclusions at last year’s BETA conference. Method and effect of the previous study. 2 corpora: students’ writing – film analysis; 1 st & 2 nd draft

Download Presentation

Corpora in assessing students’ writing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Corpora in assessing students writing

Corpora in assessing students’ writing

Elena Tarasheva, PhD

New Bulgarian University


Conclusions at last year s beta conference

Conclusions at last year’s BETA conference


Method and effect of the previous study

Method and effect of the previous study

2 corpora: students’ writing – film analysis; 1st & 2nd draft

Analysis of the message of Michael Palin’s Travel series about Eastern Europe

The first draft corpus revealed features of informal style, lack of cohesive devices through Key words; Concordancing revealed racial language.

The second draft showed improvement


Corpora and method for this study

Corpora and method for this study

  • Students’ summaries of a text; 300 words long

  • The text for the summary

    Key words for the summaries are compared to the key words for the text

    Concordancing reveals how each key word is used for the summaries and in the original

    Word lists suggest common mistakes in the writing


The corpora

The corpora

  • 13 student summaries

  • 1st year students at Sofia University

  • Language proficiency – C1

  • Taught about cohesion, coherence, linking devices, text flow

  • 4 hours of teaching per week

  • The summary was set as a homework. The work was submitted via the electronic platform Moodle


Statistics

statistics

  • tokens (running words) in text2,667

  • types (distinct words)729

  • type/token ratio (TTR)27.33

  • standardised TTR basis1,000

  • mean word length (in characters)4.99

  • sentences2,792

  • mean (in words)18.99

  • paragraphs377

  • mean (in words)100.93


Key words

Key words

  • Calculated via a statistical procedure

  • An automatic function of The Word Smith

  • Compares the frequency list of a task corpus to the frequency list of a balanced corpus – in this case: the British National Corpus

  • The words with a frequency higher than in the balanced corpus tend to show the ‘about-ness’ of a text, specific language idiosyncrasies, particulars of the style etc.

  • The words with a frequency lower than in the balanced corpus show what the author avoided


Corpora in assessing students writing

Key words in the original

Key words in the summaries

  • Rhetoric

  • We

  • Writing

  • Radical

  • Writer

  • Toward

  • Our

  • Conservative

  • Student

  • Composition

  • Honest

  • Coherence

  • Learns

  • Rhetoric

  • Writing

  • Conservative

  • Writer

  • Radical

  • Liberal

  • Coherence

  • Text

  • Composition

  • Examples

  • Author

  • Doesn

  • s


Concordancing

Concordancing

  • All the cases when a word is used in the corpus

  • The word is highlighted

  • The context to the left and right is shown

  • The concordances can be arranged to criteria pre-set by the researcher – L or R, -2, +3 etc.


The degree of formality

The degree of formality


The possessive s

The possessive ‘s


The use of linking devices

The Use of linking devices


Linking devices

Linking devices


Linking devices1

Linking devices


Clusters

Clusters

  • Automatically calculated by the Word Smith

  • Words which occur together

  • The number of words can be pre-set – 3, for this study, but it can be 4, 5, 6


Major key words in context

Major key words in context

Original collocates

Summary collocates


A missing key word

A missing key word


Concordancing1

concordancing

  • In this case – arranged according to -L1

  • Because the word is a noun and we are interested in the attributes used with it

  • If it was a verb and we wanted to see what objects follow, then we would arrange for +R1


Corpora in assessing students writing

students


Corpora in assessing students writing

original


Relative clauses

Relative clauses


Relative clauses1

Relative clauses


Language functions

Language Functions


Language functions1

Language functions


Negative keyness

Negative keyness

original

summary


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Comparing the key word lists of a text and its summary reveal whether the gist of the text has been grasped

  • Concordances show differences in focus, suggests possible misunderstandings

  • Word lists allow assessing the acquisition of grammatical features, such as relative clauses, linking words etc.

  • High key-ness can reveal language functions

  • Word lists also reveal adherence to a style


  • Login