1 / 66

Command Sergeant Major Board of Directors Break-Out Session CSM Michael D. Schultz AR CSM

USARC Commander’s Call. Command Sergeant Major Board of Directors Break-Out Session CSM Michael D. Schultz AR CSM. CSM Michael D. Schultz 703-695-7547. USARC Commander’s Call 2 – 4 DEC 11. “Take Charge!”. CSM Michael D. Schultz Command Sergeant Major U.S. Army Reserve.

jamal-bowman
Download Presentation

Command Sergeant Major Board of Directors Break-Out Session CSM Michael D. Schultz AR CSM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. USARC Commander’s Call Command Sergeant Major Board of Directors Break-Out Session CSM Michael D. Schultz AR CSM CSM Michael D. Schultz 703-695-7547

  2. USARC Commander’s Call 2 – 4 DEC 11

  3. “Take Charge!” CSM Michael D. Schultz Command Sergeant Major U.S. Army Reserve

  4. FY11 USAR CSM Priorities • Personnel: • Semi-Centralized Promotions SGT/SSG: June 2011 • Automated Sr Promotion Boards at RSC level – August 2011 Board • USAR SGM Tenure Policy (June 2011) • USAR SAMC Regulation USAR 215-1 • Created SEMO (Senior Enlisted Management Office) at HRC • Training: • NCOA-Ft Lewis Move to Camp Parks, CA OCT 2011 FOC) • Consolidated Army Drill Sergeant School (One Army School System) • Implement Army Reserve PRT Program • Institute the Soldier Fueling Initiative for the Army Reserve • Wounded Warrior: • Increase WTU/WTB Site Visit/Town Hall Meetings • Increase Awareness of Wounded Warrior Resources: • Army Reserve Family Programs / Survivor Outreach Services (SOS) / Army Warrior Adventure Quest / Employee Partnership Office

  5. FY12 USAR CSM Priorities • Personnel: • Shaping the Force: Enlisted Initiatives • Automated Sr Promotion Enlisted Board: • - Feb 12 (all Sr grades ) • Aug 2012 (SFCs only/QRB (all grades) • FY 13 (Once a Year) • Centralized PPRL (no geographic boundary) – February 2012 • NCOER (Redesign of NCOER: FY 2012) • USAR Unit Medical Readiness (PHAs/PDPHA etc.) • Army Career Tracker (ACT): Army Reserve Implementation, on-going • Training: • Improve (3)Army Reserve NCOA (Facilities, Equipment and IT), on-going • Electronic Based Distributed Learning Compensation (EBDL) • USAR Readiness-Rebalance Review (R3 Briefs) • IT improvement for NCO PME courses • Wounded Warrior: • Increase WTU/WTB Site Visit/Town Hall Meetings • Increase Awareness of Wounded Warrior Resources: • Army Reserve Family Programs / Survivor Outreach Services (SOS) / Army Warrior Adventure Quest / Employee Partnership Office

  6. USAR Medical Readiness As of 25 October 2010 As of 29 September 2011 • Cdr’s Adjusted Strength: 182K (24K in training pipeline) • End strength: 206K • Cdr’s Adjusted Strength: 187K (19K in training pipeline) • End strength: 206K Medically Ready (MR 1 and 2) Temp profile/dental 3 (MR 3A) P3/P4 MND (MR 3B) Pregnant/Limited Duty Profile (MR 3B) No PHA or Dental (MR4) Source: MEDPROS

  7. ACT Total Unique Military Users (11/10/2011)

  8. As of 28 October 2011 SSD Level 1 (1st Quarter FY 11) SSD Level 1 FY11 (Jan-May)

  9. USARC Commander’s Call E9s Flagged / Over-strength CSM Michael D. Schultz AR CSM CSM Michael D. Schultz 703-695-7547

  10. OCAR Senior Leader Development Office Army Reserve Troop Program UnitSenior Enlisted Management SGM Angel L. Ortiz Guzman Angel L. Ortiz Guzman/SLDO SGM/(502) 613-4697

  11. Outline Rotation Plans SGM Vacancies Reports Feedback DSMT Policy Guidance Way Ahead Angel L. Ortiz Guzman/SLDO SGM/(502) 613-4697

  12. Rotation Plans • TPU SGM Tenure Policy • Rotation Plans Due Date: • 15 January and 15 July • Format • Remarks Angel L. Ortiz Guzman/SLDO SGM/(502) 613-4697

  13. Rotation Plan Accountability Report

  14. Rotation Plan Template

  15. Vacancies TPU SGM Vacancy Report Updated Quarterly Career Counselors Available to Assist Useful Tool to Assist CMDs to Fill Vacancies Total Vacant SGM Positions: 242

  16. Reports Feedback Angel L. Ortiz Guzman/SLDO SGM/(502) 613-4697

  17. DSMTs Policy Guidance • TPU SGM Tenure 19 MAY 11 • ( Soldiers assigned to a valid position) • Shaping the Force – Managing TPU Senior Grade Soldiers • 27 MAR 11 / 6 MAY 10 (Soldiers who are excess) • Policy Guidance on Overstrength Assignments of Soldiers Based on AR Transformation 30 JAN 09 (Soldiers whose positions were deleted/abolished/relocated) • Conditions of Employment for DSMTs, NDST, Combat Related-NDST, and Technicians 24 OCT 08 Angel L. Ortiz Guzman/SLDO SGM/(502) 613-4697

  18. Way Ahead • Transparency • CSM/SGM Reports with Tenure Dates • Consolidated CSM Vacancies Report • Continue Partnership with USARC G Staff • Expand SLDO relationship with HQ DA, HRC and other agencies Angel L. Ortiz Guzman/SLDO SGM/(502) 613-4697

  19. Questions? Angel L. Ortiz Guzman/SLDO SGM/(502) 613-4697

  20. Contact Information Angel L. Ortiz GuzmanSGM, USASenior Leader Development OfficeOffice of the Chief Army ReserveHuman Resources Center of Excellence1600 Spearhead Division Ave.Fort Knox, KY, 40121Commercial: 502-613-4697DSN: 312-983-4697Fax: 502-613-4696Email: SLDO_SEMO@usar.army.milSLDO-SEM AKO Knowledge Center:https://www.us.army.mil/suite/grouppage/127631 Angel L. Ortiz Guzman/SLDO SGM/(502) 613-4697

  21. USARC Commander’s Call Army Reserve Enlisted Senior Promotion Board MSG Jonathan DeHart AR G-1 MSG Jonathan DeHart/G1/910-570-9516

  22. Senior Promotion Board • Purpose: • The Automated Senior Promotion Board process ensures that all eligible Soldiers are considered for promotion. • Statistical Information: • Increased consideration from 1,500 paper packets in Feb 11 to 9,000 automated records in Aug 11. • Those 9,000 eligible Soldiers were derived from over 24,000 Soldiers who met TIS/TIG requirements. • Resulted in a recommended status from 1,000 Soldiers in Feb 11 to 2,900 Soldiers in Aug 11 when considering the number of Soldiers boarded. • This indicates a quantifiable number of Soldiers who are eligible for promotion consideration according to TIS/TIG but have not shown the potential for promotion. • Way Ahead: • Continued Automated Senior Promotion Boards at RSC levels • Improvement of critical shortages at skill level 4 • Implementation of the Qualitative Retention Board for all enlisted grades

  23. Over Strength Selections • Several questions have been posed regarding the Aug 11 select rate for overstrength MOSs. • The Army Reserve has identified over strength CMFs due to the limited amount of required positions. MOS Grade Required Assigned Over Strength • 11B E-7: 156 618 396% • 11Z E-8: 44 326 740% • 11Z E-9: 5 26 520% • Current Shortages: • E-7: 12H, 12N, 12T, 25B, 25U, 27D, 31B, 31E, 35F, 35L, 36B, 37F, 38B, 68W, 74D, 79V, 88M, 92Y • E-8: 12X, 25B, 31B, 35X, 36B, 38B, 68W, 79V, 92A • E-9: 25X, 35X, 38B, 68Z, 92Z

  24. Army Leader Development Strategy CURRENT PROCESS REQUIREMENT PREVIOUS PROCESS TIME IN GRADE (TIG) CONSIDERATION REQUIREMENTS (TPU and AGR) Consideration to: E7 – 21 months E8 – 24 months E9 – 28 months Consideration to all senior grades: Primary Zone: 48 months Secondary Zone: 36 months TIME IN SERVICE (TIS) CONSIDERATION REQUIREMENTS (TPU ONLY) Consideration to: E7 – 9 years E8 – 11 years E9 – 13 years Consideration to: E7 – 9 years E8 – 12 years E9 – 17 years 2 –year obligation after promotion effective date TPU/AGR SERVICE OBLIGATION UPON PROMOTION 3 –year obligation after promotion effective date NCOES WAIVERS Allowed for grades: E6-E8 Discontinued for all grades except WLC waivers

  25. Senior Promotion Board Timeline Changes since Standardized Board Process: o 6 convening authorities versus 23 o 2 boards per year o Standardized packet format o All eligible Soldiers are considered Issues/Updates: o February 2012 Automated Board Changes. Aug 11 AAR Lessons Learned: Revision of iPERMS pull, restricted fiche, and MSG board members. o August 2012 Centralized Boards. RSCs will transition to one board per year by pay grade . Eligible Soldiers will be notified April 2012 with a July 2012 suspense. o August 2012 QRB. Implementation in conjunction with the SFC Promotion Board. This will provide the most adequate means of “Shaping the enlisted force” by identifying only the best qualified Soldiers for retention and/or promotion. o February 2013 – October 2013 Boards. RSCs centralize all grades in one location on a rotational basis. Oct 13 – 99th RSC QRB (All Grades) Sep 13 – 88th RSC SFC Prom Bd (3200) May 13 – 81st RSC MSG Prom Bd (2500) Feb 13 – 63d RSC SGM Prom Bd (1800) Aug 12 – Implement QRB SFC Prom Bd (2700) QRB (8500) Feb 12 – Scheduled Promotion Board Aug 11 – First automated promotion board for AR senior enlisted TPU Standardized Board Process 21 Jan 09 – Seniors 7 Dec 09 - Juniors

  26. Qualitative Retention Board • What: Definition in accordance with AR 135-205: View all eligible Soldiers E1-E9 and determine retention of the best qualified Soldiers within each pay grade and CMF. Those Soldiers deemed substandard within each grade and CMF will be identified for removal from the Army Reserve strength. • When: August 2012 in conjunction with the SFC promotion board. Soldiers are only eligible for QRB review once every two years. • Where: Each Soldier’s geographical Regional Support Command • Why: Provide the command a control method for the enlisted personnel inventory and to manage career progression.

  27. Qualitative Retention Board • Who: All enlisted Soldiers with 20 years qualifying service and a 20 year letter. • Total QRB numbers are estimated at 8,500. • Exemptions from QRB consideration include: • Those within 9 months of age 60 • Those with a bar to reenlistment or extension in effect • Those under suspension of favorable personnel actions except APFT and body fat • Those promoted within 1 year prior to the convene date of the QRB • CSM of a two-star command • Those eligible for sanctuary • Those not DMOSQ for their respective grade and duty position (ETP to remove this exemption has been requested)

  28. Senior Promotion Board Questions MSG Jonathan DeHart/G1/910-570-9516

  29. USARC Commander’s Call Readiness-Rebalance Review (R3) SGM Sondra Helton AR Command Readiness SGM SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  30. Readiness-Rebalance Review (R3) A round table Senior Enlisted forum; an informal review to facilitate discussion with MSC CSMs, ESC/BDE CSMs IOT review units current posture and trends in critical readiness areas • Facilitates rebalancing efforts which supports the CARs “Shaping the Force” objectives • Educate and assist MSCs with Medical Readiness Issues specifically addressing the AGR/AC force • Educates and assists MSCs with Medical Readiness Issues specifically addressing the AGR/AC force • The R3 is a separate event that takes place prior to and in conjunction with the ARFORGEN Readiness Review (AR2) AR CSM directed and executed program with support from the Deputy Commanding General-Operations SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  31. Readiness-Rebalance Review (R3) Readiness Areas Addressed: • Top 5 Over / Under Strength Units • E9 Over strength – Identified by MSC CSM • E8 Over strength – Identified by MSC CSM • E8-E9 Flags • Marginal 1059s – By exception • AGR/AC Profiles – P3/4 • 1SG/SGM/CSM – Clearance Issues • Training – T/R 2 Units of Interest – Identified by BDE CSM • Due Outs – Six (6) month follow up By Name Rosters will be provided to the MSC CSM 30 days prior to scheduled R3 SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  32. Readiness-Rebalance Review (R3) Key takeaways: • Brief by Exception • Due Outs Captured throughout and back briefed • Capture and share best practices • Six (6) month follow up visit • Follow through on deliverables SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  33. R3 Schedule – Operational Commands SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  34. R3 Schedule – Functional Commands SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  35. R3 Schedule – Training Commands SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  36. R3 Schedule – Supporting Commands SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  37. R3 Schedule – Regional Support Commands SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  38. Readiness-Rebalance Review (R3) QUESTIONS SGM Sondra Helton/CMD GRP/910-570-8806

  39. USARC Commander’s Call ARFORGEN Readiness Review (AR2) SGM Edwin Lopez AR G33 SGM Edwin Lopez/G33/910-570-9167

  40. ARFORGEN Readiness Review (AR2) • Purpose – To discuss the readiness of formations within ARFORGEN • Focus on formations based on Available Force Pool Dates (AFPD). • Facilitates an understanding of ARFORGEN Aim Points at the CSM level (Aim Points are indentified in AR 525-29) • Emphasis throughout the forum is to address individual Soldier readiness inhibitors and engage in frank discussion on how to mitigate the issues. • Identify responsibility for issues that reside within the MSC or with the USARC. • Meet the readiness goals of Army Reserve formations SGM Edwin Lopez/G33/910-570-9167

  41. ARFORGEN Readiness Review (AR2) • USARCG-33 Readiness Responsibilities: • Establish communication with MSC and provide OPORD • Conduct assistance visit to provide guidance on briefing format and expectation 30 days prior to AR2 • Facilitate AR2 CSM session and formulate out-brief to DCG and MSC • Develop and direct staff working group session to find solutions to issues • Conduct six month re-visit with MSC to discuss the implementation of solutions SGM Edwin Lopez/G33/910-570-9167

  42. ARFORGEN Readiness Review (AR2) • MSC/BDE CSM Expectations: • MCS CSM engages BDE CSMs to pre identify inhibitors that are not within their control prior to the AR2. • Inhibitors are communicated in an open forum and enables sharing of best practices shared across the MSC C2 and the MSCs • Prepare to brief unit readiness status and engage in discussion on inhibitors; areas that you can’t fix • Assist in formulating COAs to issues identified in CSM working group • Take corrective action on issues identified as internal inhibitors SGM Edwin Lopez/G33/910-570-9167

  43. ARFORGEN Readiness Review (AR2) • Topics of Discussion: • Unit Rollup- unit(s), strength, non-deployable, equipment O/H, training assessment, AGRs req/assigned, SEC clearance, FRG • Manning- personnel available, avail DMOSQ, SG avail, non-deployable, UNSATs, PHAs, Dental CL 4 • Training- MOS not scheduled, IMT not scheduled, NCOES backlog • Key Inhibitors- top ten issues that affect unit readiness • Units of interest SGM Edwin Lopez/G33/910-570-9167

  44. AR2 Process Map Day 2 Day 1 AR2 Staff Action WG Sr Leader Briefings • WG Breakout Session • Clarification of Issue • (Policy, Process, System) • Fix responsibility • (Enterprise, Staff, MSC) • Identify OPR • Task Organization • USARC Staff • Enterprise Reps • MSC/RSC Consolidated Out Brief 1\2 Day 1\2 Day Inhibitors Staff Action Working Group SYSTEMIC ISSUES + Return to MSC for Action Inhibitors AEB AREB Recommended Solution FORSCOM Review Status of Previous Actions • Validation/Approval • Staff Director • Enterprise Lead Six months Later ARCP SGM Edwin Lopez/G33/910-570-9167

  45. ARFORGEN Readiness Review (AR2) QUESTIONS SGM Edwin Lopez/G33/910-570-9167

  46. Combat Support Training Program CSM Harold P. Estabrooks USAR Regulations (Draft) 350-50-1,2,3,4

  47. CSTP • WAREX / CSTX / Global Medic • Establishes the Train-Alert-Deploy Model • Focuses training, resources and manning • Enhances collective training proficiency

  48. Performance Issues • Basics - accountability, uniform, weapons, communications, inspections, urgency* • Not prepared for WTBD, TLP & MDMP • Leadership not present for training • Units at 38% strength • WAREX 70% • CSTX 80% • Lukewarm*

  49. Planning Issues • Training Management • Timeline • Continuity, Fidelity & Number of Planners • CT Selection / Enrollment CT Academy

  50. Future Exercises • Exercise frequency • Conference methodology • Shift from COIN to ULO • Move from COLs to TAAs / Base Clusters • Organic equipment • Do it yourself operations • All units evaluated (TA ,SPT, TNG) • Directed

More Related