Principles parameters approach in linguistics iv
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics - IV PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 104 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics - IV. Bibhuti Bhusan Mahapatra. Levels of Representation and θ-theory. D-structure Subcategorization applies in the D-structure via X-Bar theory. S-structure

Download Presentation

Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics - IV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Principles parameters approach in linguistics iv

Principles & Parameters Approach in Linguistics - IV

Bibhuti Bhusan Mahapatra


Levels of representation and theory

Levels of Representation and θ-theory

  • D-structure

    • Subcategorization applies in the D-structure via X-Bar theory.

  • S-structure

    • Grammatical functions (GFs), e.g. ‘subject- of’, ‘object-of’ apply at S-structure. Theta roles can be taken as GFs.

  • Logical Form

    • The semantic features of θ-roles apply at s-structure LF


X bar and subcategorization

X-Bar and Subcategorization

1)XP

Specifier X’

X Complement

  • If α is a 0-level category of X-bar theory then the category β must satisfy the subcategorization frame ofα. In this case we will say that α subcategorizes the position occupied by by β. (Chomsky P: 37)


Subcategorization and theta marking

Subcategorization and Theta Marking

The representation in (2) is an alternative notation of X-bar theory given in (1):

2)[γ … α…β…]

[γ …β…α …]

  • [α is x-head of x-bar notation; β is the complement]

  • α and β are immediate constituents of γ

  • γ is XP of x-bar notation)

  • Head-complement order is free

    The same configuration [which indicates the subcategorized position] is relevant to determination of θ-role. (Chomsky


Subcategorization and theta marking1

Subcategorization and Theta marking:

2)[γ … α…β…]

[γ …β…α …]

  • α theta marks the position occupied by β. (p: 37)

  • α theta marks the category β if α theta marks the positionoccupied by β or a trace of β. (p: 37)

  • Clearly, theta marking is closely related to subcategorization. The two notions are not identical however. (p: 37)


Subcategorization and theta marking a difference

Subcategorization and Theta marking:A difference

  • A verb may not subcategorize the subject position but it may theta mark the subject.

  • Double objects are also theta marked; but, in the strict sense, are they subcategorized?


Projection principle restated

Projection Principle (restated)

2)[γ … α…β…]

[γ …β…α …]

  • If β is an immediate constituent of γ in (2) at leveli and γ = α’, then α theta-marks β in γ.

  • If α selects β in γ as lexical property, then α selects β in γ at leveli.

  • If α selects β in γ at leveli, then α selects β at levelj.


Subcategorization and grammatical functions

Subcategorization and Grammatical Functions

  • “From the earliest work in generative grammar, as in traditional grammar, it has been assumed that what I am now calling “θ-role” is determined in part by a representation in terms of grammatical functions (GFs) such as subject-of, object-of, and so on, where GFs are determined in terms of syntactic configurations


Levels of representation an example

Levels of Representation: An Example

3) .

.

.

VP

specifierV’

killcomplement (lexical)

SubjectKillObject(syntax)

Agentkilltheme(LF)

Rama killed RavaNa


Application of theta criterion

Application of theta criterion

  • Each Argument bears one and only one -role, and each theta role is assigned to one and only one argument.

  • How is the above condition applied?


Theta chain and theta criterion

Theta chain and theta criterion

  • Any chain formed by an element moving to a theta position is not licit.

    4) It seems [Mary] likes [John]]

    5) Maryi seems[ti] to like [John]

    6) *Mary seems [Johnji] to like [ti]

    7) *Mary seems [Johnji] likes [ti]

  • In (6) John which has the object theta moves to the subject position; so, it gets two theta roles. Thus, the chain violates the theta criterion.

  • (7) shows that even a case position does not allow the theta chain.


Thank you

Thank You


  • Login