1 / 20

Understanding Privacy Breach Risk: Ontario Universities Risk Management Symposium

Understanding Privacy Breach Risk: Ontario Universities Risk Management Symposium. Presented by Brian Rosenbaum LL.B. Director, Legal and Research Practice Financial Services Group Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc. 25 November 2009. Agenda. Introduction

jalila
Download Presentation

Understanding Privacy Breach Risk: Ontario Universities Risk Management Symposium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Understanding Privacy Breach Risk: OntarioUniversities Risk Management Symposium Presented by Brian Rosenbaum LL.B. Director, Legal and Research Practice Financial Services Group Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc. 25 November 2009

  2. Agenda • Introduction • The Unique Exposures of Higher Education Institutions • A Myriad of Legislation • Key Regulatory Issues • Privacy Breach Statistics • Types of Privacy Breaches • Privacy Breach Examples • Privacy Breach Risks • Costs of a Breach • Privacy Governance • Privacy Breach Links/References • Questions

  3. Introduction • Universal Exposure • Technological Explosion • Privacy Breaches on the Rise • University’s and College’s Unique Risks

  4. The Unique Exposures ofHigher Education Institutions • A Learning and Sharing Environment • Open information sharing is a higher learning foundation • Remote access to networks and databases is commonplace • Universities are Like Little Cities • PI of many different types of individuals (students, alumni, employees, applicants, patients) • Various types of PI (educational records, research information, financial information, health information) • Technology Savvy and Sophisticated Internet Users • Students are first users of new technologies • Pressure for universities to adopt new platforms and systems • Outsourcing Issues • Outsourcing e-mail and data storage may have many advantages but there are privacy issues

  5. Privacy Law Overview Ontario • Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) • June 2006 amendments brings educational institutions under its jurisdiction • Regulates use, collection, disclosure and retention of PI by higher education institutions • Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) • Regulates use, collection, disclosure and retention of PI in the context of university activity that is commercial in nature that is not “core” to university mandate • Applies if PI flows outside of province or country • Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) • Regulates the collection, use and disclose of personal health information

  6. Privacy Law Overview continued Differences in Applicable Legislation • Pose challenges in creating one uniform privacy policy • Examples of differing provisions: • Disclosure of PI where no consent • Breach notification

  7. Privacy Breaches and Notification • Current Law under PIPEDA/FIPPA • When does the obligation to notify arise? • Failure to properly notify in timely fashion can lead to civil and regulatory liability • Early notification = mitigation • PIPEDA and FIPPA have no mandatory breach notification obligations • Guidelines/protocols strongly urge to notify if breach creates a risk of significant harm • Industry Canada Proposal • Mandatory breach notification requirements on the way • Discretion left in hands of organization • Threshold to report is “high risk of significant harm” • Reporting window is “as soon as reasonably possible” • Report “material breaches” to the Privacy Commissioner • Current Law under PHIPA • Only Canadian legislation with mandatory breach notification requirements • First reasonable opportunity threshold

  8. Privacy Breach Statistics ESI U.S. University Data Security Breach Study • 2006 • 83 data security breaches • 65 affected institutions • 2.7 million data records • 2007 • 139 data security breaches • 112 affected institutions • 1.25 million data records • 2008 • 173 data security breaches • 178 institutions • 4.9 million data records • 2009 (so far) • 72 data security breaches • 66 institutions

  9. Privacy Breach Statistics continued ESI U.S. University Data Security Breach Study continued

  10. Privacy Breach Statistics continued ESI U.S. University Data Security Breach Study continued

  11. Types of Privacy Breaches Ponemon Institute – Primary Source of Breach 2008

  12. Canadian Privacy Breach Examples • Brock University (September 2006) • McGill University (April 2007) • Memorial University (September 2008) • Trent University (February 2009) • Ryerson University (February 2009) • Huron University College (March 2009) • Carleton University (September 2009) • Memorial University (September 2009)

  13. U.S. University Privacy Breach Examples • California State Polytechnic University (15 Nov. 2009) • Chaminade University (6 Nov. 2009) • Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania (1 Nov. 2009) • California State University (14 Oct. 2009) • University of Wisconsin (12 Oct. 2009) • Roane State Community College (12 Oct. 2009) • University of North Carolina (24 Sep. 2009) • Eastern Kentucky University (24 Sep. 2009) • Boston University (20 Aug. 2009) • University of California (17 Jul. 2009) • Cornell University (23 Jun. 2009) • University of North Dakota (17 Jun. 2009)

  14. Privacy Breach Risks • Civil Suits • From business partners (i.e. financial institutions for credit card notification and recall expenses) • From students, faculty, the general public for identity theft • Regulatory Investigations and Proceedings • From the Privacy Commissioner of Ontario pursuant to FIPPA or PHIPA • From the Privacy Commissioner of Canada pursuant to PIPEDA • Universities Own Costs • Damage to data and property • Recovery and restoration expenses • Loss of intellectual property • Business interruption • Loss of business opportunity • Damage to Reputation • Enrollment • Future revenues • Business partnerships

  15. Cost of a Breach • Liability • Compensatory damages • Regulatory actions • Direct Damages to Insured • Business interruption • Mitigation • Costs to restore information • Internal investigation • Legal fees • Lost customers • Lost employee productivity • Response Plan • Public disclosure and notification • Interaction with regulators/authorities • Crisis Management Costs • Call centre and website • Credit monitoring • Public relations

  16. Privacy Governance • Breach Investigated and Assessed • What caused the breach? • How was it detected? • What personal information was involved? • How secure was the information (e.g. encryption)? • How many individuals affected? • Does the breach appear to be criminal? • Is there a potential harm for those affected? • Notification • What notification laws apply? • Should affected individuals be notified? • What are the reasonable expectations of those affected? • Is there a risk of harm (e.g. humiliation)? • Is there an ability to mitigate? • What are your contractual obligations? • Reputation considerations

  17. Privacy Governance continued • Breach Risk Control Considerations • Conceptual • Have you recognized privacy as a risk for your organization? • Would it cause reputation or financial risk? • Have you developed a strategy to handle this risk? • Is the risk disclosed to investors (e.g. AIF statement)? • Have you determined whether you will notify? • Have you identified responsibilities within your organization? • Have you identified outside parties to engage if you have a breach? • How will your strategy be funded? • Prevention • How are you ensuring the security of your systems? • Operational Consistency – Is your data retention strategy in sync with your privacy obligations? With your privacy policy? Do you utilize a CRM platform? What information is being collected? How long is the data held for? • What training is being provided to employees - About your privacy policy? About your privacy obligations? About security? About reporting requirements?

  18. Privacy Governance • Breach Risk Control Considerations continued • Assessment • Who is responsible for investigating potential breaches? • What reporting structure is in place? • Has a methodology been created for an assessment/reporting? • What external resources are required in assessing a potential breach? • PIPEDA self-assessment tool http://www.privcom.gc.ca/information/pub/ar-vr/pipeda_sa_tool_200807_e.pdf • Notification • Will you notify those affected by a breach? What methodology will be used to determine? Has a formal plan been created? Has it been communicated? • Who will be responsible for the notification? What oversight is required? • Who will provide legal advice? • Will you hire a PR firm? Has the firm been identified? Have they been briefed on your notification plan? • Will the notification include your website and/or customer relations team? • Who will communicate with regulators?

  19. Privacy Breach Links/References

  20. Questions and Discussion

More Related