1 / 25

2013 Campus Climate Survey Gallaudet University

2013 Campus Climate Survey Gallaudet University. Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality Angela MacCaskill Chief Diversity Officer. Survey Overview.

jalene
Download Presentation

2013 Campus Climate Survey Gallaudet University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2013 Campus Climate Survey Gallaudet University • Pat Hulsebosch • Office of Academic Quality • Angela MacCaskill • Chief Diversity Officer

  2. Survey Overview • The Gallaudet University Campus Climate Survey was developed in 2007 in order to better understand, respond to, and monitor concerns of Gallaudet University employees regarding climate and campus strategies designed to improve climate. • The following survey analyzes six thematic areas: • Respect and Trust • Communication and Information Sharing • Management Style • Bilingualism • Academic Culture • Freedom of Expression • There were 345 administrators, faculty, staff, and professional staff who participated in the 2013 Campus Climate Survey. • This year there was a 42% response rate; the highest in five years. Faculty and professional staff have the highest response rate.

  3. Overall Key Findings • Best aspects about Gallaudet: Gallaudet employees highly rated the accessibility of events through ASL and English, supervisor receptiveness to input, the variety of communication means, and ongoing diversity programs. • Respondents further emphasized that they appreciate the campus community/collegiality, bilingualism on campus, emphasis on multiculturalism and diversity, and the academic environment. • Improvements for Gallaudet: Gallaudet employees were dissatisfied with the apparent favoritism in hiring practices on campus, lack of employee incentives and support (e.g., monetary raises and benefits), and the transparency of decision making and administrative policies.

  4. Key Findings – Climate Survey Subscales • Respect and Trust: The highest rated statement regarding Respect and Trust was the availability of ongoing diversity programs. The lowest rated statement was transparent/consistent communication. • Communication and Information Sharing: The highest rated statement regarding Communication and Information Sharing was the receptiveness of supervisors to input. The lowest rated statement was the upward flow of information. • Management Style: The highest rated statement regarding Management Style was the availability of clear ethical policies. The lowest rated statement was the idea that favoritism doesn’t occur.

  5. Key Findings – Climate Survey Subscales • Bilingualism: The highest rated statement regarding Bilingualism was the accessibility of events and meetings through both ASL and English. The lowest rated statement was the support of the budget for the bilingual mission. • Academic Culture: The highest rated statement regarding Academic Culture was that students receive appropriate accommodations. The lowest rated statement was that civil behavior is modeled and reinforced. • Freedom of Expression: The highest rated statement regarding Freedom of Expression was the receptiveness of supervisors to input. The lowest rated statement was that decision making is inclusive and transparent.

  6. Key Findings – Climate Survey Subscales • For FIVE of the SIX Climate Survey Subscale scores Hearing employees’ ratings were statistically significantly higher than Deaf/Hard of Hearing employees ratings. • For the Academic Culture Subscale, Deaf/Hard of Hearing employees’ ratings were statistically significantly higher than Hearing employees’ ratings. • No other between group differences were statistically significant.

  7. Respect and Trust

  8. Respect & Trust Subscale * Patterned boxes indicate a statistically significant difference between groups.

  9. Communication and Information Sharing

  10. Communication/Information Sharing Subscale Percent Reporting Strongly Agree or Agree * Patterned boxes indicate a statistically significant difference between groups.

  11. Management Style

  12. Management Style Subscale Percent Reporting Strongly Agree or Agree * Patterned boxes indicate a statistically significant difference between groups.

  13. Bilingualism

  14. Bilingualism Subscale Percent Reporting Strongly Agree or Agree * Patterned boxes indicate a statistically significant difference between groups.

  15. Academic Culture

  16. Academic Culture Subscale Percent Reporting Strongly Agree or Agree * Patterned boxes indicate a statistically significant difference between groups.

  17. Freedom of Expression

  18. Freedom Of Expression Subscale Percent Reporting Strongly Agree or Agree * Patterned boxes indicate a statistically significant difference between groups.

  19. Overall Trends

  20. Statements with Highest Approval Rating

  21. Statements with Lowest Approval Rating

  22. Statements with Lowest Approval Rating For the past three years these items have been among the lowest rated items (in some years, they were the only low rated items).

  23. “One thing I appreciate about working at Gallaudet is…”

  24. “One recommendation to improve Gallaudet is…”

  25. P 202.756.2971 F 866.808.6585 www.hanoverresearch.com 1750 H Street NW, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20006

More Related