1 / 17

T opography in keratoconus

T opography in keratoconus . Abolfazl Kashfi MD I sfarhan medical university. Pattern recognition. Pattern recognition. inferior steepening asymmetric or broken bowtie. Pattern recognition. Advantages easy and quick Disadvantages

jadzia
Download Presentation

T opography in keratoconus

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Topography in keratoconus AbolfazlKashfi MD Isfarhan medical university

  2. Pattern recognition

  3. Pattern recognition inferior steepening asymmetric or broken bowtie

  4. Pattern recognition • Advantages easy and quick • Disadvantages subjective qualitative severely affected by scale

  5. Keratometric data normal cornea • Flatten from center to periphery 2-4D • Nasal is flatter than temporal • 41 to 47 D at center average 43.5 D • Each eye is mirror images of the fellow eye

  6. Simulated keratometry (Sim K) Central corneal power (D) < 47.2 Normal 47.2 < Keratoconus suspect<48.7 > 1 D difference between SimK(S) of fellow eyes >48.7 Keratoconus > 2 D difference between SimK(S) of fellow eyes

  7. Inferior - Superior (I-S) index • Rabinowitz- McDonnelI-S index (difference between average of five superir points and five inferior points in central 3mm of cornea each 30 degrees apart) < 1.4 Normal 1.4< Keratoconus suspect < 1.9 > 1.9 keratoconus maybe normal in central KC

  8. Corneal Surface Asphericity index (CAI) Q value About – 0.26 normal Less (more negative) than -0.26 keratoconus suspect

  9. Corneal Surface Asymmetry index (SAI) (Sum of difference between symmetric points ) Normal less than 0.5 D

  10. Surface Regularity Index (SRI) compares differences between neighbor points within central 4.5 mm 0 < normal < 1 >1 keratoconus suspect non specific

  11. Differential Sector Index (DSI) Divides the cornea to 8 equal sectors (each sector 45 degrees) Reports the greatest difference in average power between any two sectors 0.21< Normal < 3.51 Opposite Sector Index (OSI) Divides the cornea to 8 equal sectors (each sector 45 degrees) Represents the greatest difference of average power in opposite sectors -0.55 < Normal < 2.09

  12. Center Surrond Index (CSI) The difference in the average area corrected corneal power between the central corneal zone 3 mm in diameter and a 3 mm annulus surrounding the central area -0.28 < Normal < 0.80

  13. Keratoconus Predictability Index (KPI) Maeda and Klycehas generated KPI using 8 keratometricindices and 11 quantitative criteria and a complex data analysis system called “neural network system”. Keratoconus >23 % Keratoconus index (KCI) the keratoconus-like pattern is determined and expressed as a percentage 0 < keratoconus suspect < 5% Keratoconus >5 %

  14. Skewed Radial Axes (SRAX) >20 degree abnormal

  15. KISA% index (keratometry, I-S, skew percentage, astigmatism) Normal < 60 % 60% < keratoconus suspect < 100 % keratoconus >100%

  16. Keratoconus Severity Index (KSI) Normal < 15% 15% < suspect < 30% Keratoconus > 30 % Highest rate of steepening (HRS) Abnormal > 1.5 D per 1 mm

  17. Thanks for your attention

More Related