Preparing a Grant Application: Steps to Success
Download
1 / 27

Preparing a Grant Application: Steps to Success - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 574 Views
  • Updated On :

Preparing a Grant Application: Steps to Success Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Shelley Benjamin & Karen Rudzinski Division of Research Education, OEREP [email protected] Overview Getting Started Application processes Application strategies Getting Started

Related searches for Preparing a Grant Application: Steps to Success

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Preparing a Grant Application: Steps to Success' - jaden


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Agency for healthcare research and quality ahrq l.jpg
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Shelley Benjamin & Karen Rudzinski

Division of Research Education, OEREP

[email protected]


Overview l.jpg
Overview

  • Getting Started

  • Application processes

  • Application strategies


Getting started l.jpg
Getting Started

  • Internet is funding gateway

  • AHRQ and NIH use essentially same application process

  • Keep abreast of research priorities and open solicitations



Nih and ahrq grant application similarities l.jpg
NIH AND AHRQ GrantApplication Similarities

  • Announcement publication: NIH Guide for Grants (http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html) and www.http://grants.gov

  • Mechanisms – e.g., RO3, R36, K08, K02, R01

  • Application forms: PHS 398, 416-1

  • Receipt dates

  • Application submission and referral – NIH Center for Scientific Review

  • Application review procedures

    For AHRQ “assignment,” line 2 of the application (PHS form 398) should indicate the name of an AHRQ PA/RFA


Ahrq nih solicitations request for applications rfa l.jpg

Formal statement inviting applications (grant or coop. agree.) on a well-defined area with specific objectives

Specific, one-time application receipt date

Specific $ and # of awards

Special review panels or study section review

AHRQ/NIH Solicitations -- Request for Applications (RFA)


Ahrq nih solicitations program announcements pa l.jpg
AHRQ/NIH Solicitations -- Program Announcements (PA) agree.) on a well-defined area with specific objectives

  • Describes AHRQ’s broad research interests.

  • Individual project designs reflect the ideas and creativity of the investigators.

  • Set receipt dates; funding dependent upon availability of money

  • Reviewed by standing study sections – HCRT for training grants

  • All active individual training grants are in form of PA


Examples of program announcements research topics of interest to ahrq l.jpg
Examples of Program Announcements – research topics of interest to AHRQ

  • PAR-04-039 AHRQ Grants for Health Services Research Dissertation

  • PAR-04-016 AHRQ Minority Research Infrastructure Support Program (M-RISP)

  • PA-03-117 AHRQ Grant Program for Large Conference Support

  • PAR-01-040 AHRQ Small Research Grant Program

  • PAR-00-141 Small Grant Program for Conference Support

  • PA-00-111 AHRQ Health Services Research—Program Announcement

  • PA-00-069 Predoctoral Fellowship Awards For Minority Students

  • PA-00-010 Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Awards

  • PAR-99-164 Independent Scientist Awards

  • PA-99-005 Individual Postdoctoral Fellowship Awards


Application processes l.jpg
Application Processes interest to AHRQ

  • Most AHRQ research grant applications must use PHS form 398 --http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html

  • Fellowship applications use form PHS 416-1http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/416/phs416.htm

  • All forms can be found under “Tools and Resources” at http://www.ahrq.gov/fund/training/trainix.htm

  • All applications sent to the NIH Center for Scientific Review – will be changing to electronic submission in near future

  • Investigators may request (in cover letter with application) assignment of an application to a specific study section and/or agency/institute (request assignment is not guaranteed)


Application receipt dates l.jpg
Application Receipt Dates interest to AHRQ

  • Health Services Research Dissertation Awards -- Receipt Deadline Date: February 15, June 15, October 15

  • Independent Scientist Awards -- Receipt Deadline Date: February 17, June 15, October 15

  • Mentored Clinical Scientist Award -- Receipt Deadline Date: February 1, June 1, October 1

  • Individual Postdoctoral Fellowship Awards -- Receipt Deadline Date: April 5, August 5, December 5 -- these may be changing soon

  • Predoctoral Fellowship Awards for Minority Students -- Receipt Deadline Date: May 1, November 15-- these may be changing soon


Application process l.jpg
Application Process interest to AHRQ

  • Application must be received by due date or bear a proof-of-mailing date by deadline (read the announcement to find which pertains)

  • Applications sent from NIH to AHRQ, where they are assigned to a study section and to a specific PO at a Center/Office within AHRQ

  • Review typically occurs 4 months after applications received

  • Funding decisions occur 1-3 months later

  • Resubmission – generally two allowed, dissertations one


Ahrq staff involved in grants process l.jpg
AHRQ Staff Involved in Grants Process interest to AHRQ

  • Referral Officer

  • Review Staff – Scientific Review Administrator and Grants Management Specialist Team

  • Program Staff – Project Officer (PO)

  • Grants Management


Phases of an application project agency staff contacts l.jpg
Phases of an Application/Project & interest to AHRQ Agency Staff Contacts

  • Preapplication

    • P.O.s, Review/Referral, Grants Management

  • Application

    • Review/Referral, Grants Management

  • Grant award

    • P.O.s, Grants Management

  • Post closeout

    • P.O.s, Grants Management


Scientific review group study section l.jpg
Scientific Review Group interest to AHRQ(“Study Section”)

  • Scientific Review Administrator

    • Recruits and selects reviewers

    • Assigns applications to specific reviewers

    • Sees that each application gets review that is competent, thorough and fair

    • Assures that proper review criteria used

    • Prepares summary statements of review

  • Reviewers are Members or temporary members of Study Section or “SEP”

    • Scientists with appropriate expertise

    • Dependable, reasonable, open minded


Review procedures l.jpg
Review Procedures interest to AHRQ

  • Applications assigned to 2-3 reviewers for written comments, but reviewed and discussed by all reviewers

  • If all reviewers agree in advance that an application is non-competitive, the study section may choose not to discuss the application (triage process). At present all training/career development grants are discussed – may change

  • A summary statement conveying the comments and assessment of the reviewers is sent to the principal investigator


Ingredients of a successful grant application l.jpg
Ingredients of a Successful interest to AHRQGrant Application

  • GOOD IDEA

  • GOOD SCIENCE

  • GOOD APPLICATION

    Adapted from: Gordon, Stephen L. “Ingredients of a Successful Grant Application to the National Institutes of Health.” J. Orthopaed. Rsch. 7:138-141 (1989) (as reprinted in Preparing a Research Grant Application to the National Institutes of Health)


What determines which awards are made l.jpg
What Determines Which Awards Are Made? interest to AHRQ

  • Scientific merit

    • Significance and originality

    • Methods

  • Program considerations

    • What is uniquely AHRQ

    • Existing portfolio balance

    • Anticipated IMPACT of research

  • Availability of funds


Application preparation suggestions l.jpg
Application Preparation Suggestions interest to AHRQ

  • Follow Instructions

  • Be clear

  • Be organized

  • Watch your language

  • Cover all bases

    Adapted from Federal Grants & Contracts, “Project Opportunities in Research, Training, and Services Grant Workshop” by Pam Moore


Basic elements of the research plan l.jpg
Basic Elements of the Research Plan

  • Specific aims

    • What does the investigator intend to do?

  • Background and significance

    • Why is the work important?

  • Preliminary studies

    • What has the applicant already done?

  • Research design and methods

    • How is the applicant going to do the proposed work?


Common problems in applications l.jpg
Common Problems in Applications Plan

  • Lack of original idea and/or scientific rationale

  • Diffuse, superficial, or unfocused research plan

  • Questionable methodology

  • Lack of important details

  • Lack of experience in methodology

  • Lack of generalizability of findings or methods

  • No attention to human subjects and/or population representation issues

  • Unrealistically large amount of work


New common problem applications of application l.jpg
New Common Problem – “ PlanApplications of Application”

  • No apparent translatability of research into practice or policy

  • Not unique to AHRQ


Practical tips l.jpg
Practical Tips Plan

  • Make a rough draft of your application … then let it sit so you can distance yourself and review it a bit more dispassionately

  • Does the draft seem coherent? Are transitions logical?

  • Have you checked for grammar, spelling and typographical errors? Is the draft readable?

  • Have an objective person review the draft and final copy; involvement of mentors is critical

  • All of this requires hard work, study, and mental discipline


Specific issues with dissertation applications l.jpg
Specific Issues with Dissertation Applications Plan

  • Letters

  • Involvement of Mentors

  • Adequacy of committee membership

  • Relevance to HSR and AHRQ

  • Balance between specificity, originality, and career potential

  • Doability


Specific issues with career development applications l.jpg
Specific Issues with Career Development Applications Plan

  • Balance between career development plan and research

  • Mentors (K08)

  • Doability

  • Why need the funds

  • Adequacy of career development plans given where are at in career and what are proposing to do


What steps to successful career development looks like l.jpg
What Steps to Successful Career Development Looks Like Plan

Save Lives and Dollars

Change Practices

Visibility & Dissemination

Publication

Graduation


ad