The Pete Rose Case Pete Rose is one of the greatest baseball players of all time Controversy about whether he should be reinstated for allegedly gambling
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
of all time
Controversy about whether he should be reinstated for allegedly gambling
Is it ethical to allow Pete Rose to be reinstated, despite the rule in baseball and all professional sports prohibiting betting/gambling?Observations and Defining the Problem
2. Reinstate Pete Rose conditionally, if he apologizes and admits to betting in baseball
3. Not reinstate Pete Rose, but allow him to be considered for the Hall of Fame
Stakeholder group that’s significantly affected by options: Other professional sports leagues
Pete Rose: remains banned but validated by Hall of Fame admission
MLB: lingering issue resolved, rules compromised
Hall of Fame: complete, integrity questioned
Other Professional Sports: integrity and rule enforcement questioned
Who is most affected?
Other Professional Sports leagues because a precedent will be setStakeholder Analysis – Option 3
Weakens rules and questions administrative dedication
Benefits to stakeholders:
Resolution for all parties
Complete Hall of FameUtilitarian Analysis – Option 3
Creepy Scenario does not occur with this option
Consideration for Hall of Fame leads to its completion
Resolution of this controversy is a win win situation for both the MLB and Pete Rose. MLB can put this situation into the past, and Pete Rose will be eligible for Hall of Fame
Gives bad reputation to the MLBConditional Reinstatement based Upon Apology – Option 2
This chart shows how both Major League Baseball and Pete Rose are affected by the virtues we found to be important.
Do not reinstate Pete Rose