Pertemuan 22 analisis studi kasus 2
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 8

Pertemuan 22 Analisis Studi Kasus 2 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 114 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Pertemuan 22 Analisis Studi Kasus 2. Matakuliah: H0204/ Rekayasa Sistem Komputer Tahun: 2005 Versi: v0 / Revisi 1. Learning Outcomes. Pada akhir pertemuan ini, diharapkan mahasiswa akan mampu : Menghubungkan antara repair system dengan discard system. Outline Materi.

Download Presentation

Pertemuan 22 Analisis Studi Kasus 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Pertemuan 22 analisis studi kasus 2

Pertemuan 22Analisis Studi Kasus 2

Matakuliah: H0204/ Rekayasa Sistem Komputer

Tahun: 2005

Versi: v0 / Revisi 1


Learning outcomes

Learning Outcomes

Pada akhir pertemuan ini, diharapkan mahasiswa

akan mampu :

  • Menghubungkan antara repair system dengan discard system


Outline materi

Outline Materi

  • Studi kasus : Repair versus Discard Evaluation


Studi kasus 2 repair versus discard evaluation

Studi Kasus 2 :Repair versus Discard Evaluation

Bacalah studi kasus berikut ini

  • In expanding the maintenance concept to establish criteria for equipment design, it is necessary to determine whether it is economically feasible to repair certain assemblies or to discard them when failures occur. If the decision is to accomplish repair, it is appropriate to determine the maintenance level at which the repair should be accomplished (i.e. intermediate maintenance or supplier/ depot maintenance).

  • Suppose that a computer system will be distributed in quantities of 65 throughout three major geographical areas. The system will be utilized to support both scientific and management functions within various industrial firms and government agencies. Although the actual system utilization will vary from one consumer organization to the next, an average utilization of 4 hours per day (for a 360-day year) is assumed.


Studi kasus 2 repair versus discard evaluation1

Studi Kasus 2 : Repair versus Discard Evaluation

  • The computer system is currently in the early development stage, should be in production in 18 months, and will be operational in 2 years. The full complement of 65 computer systems is expected to be in use in 4 years and will be available through the eight year of the program before system phase out commences. The system life cycle, for the purposes of the analysis, is 10 years.

  • Based on early design data, the computer system will be packaged in major units with a built-in test capability that will isolate faults to the unit level. Faulty unit will be removed and replaced at the organizational level (i.e comsumer’s facility), and sent to the intermediate maintenance shop for repair. Unit repair will be accomplished through assembly replacement, and assemblies will be either repaired or discarded. There is a total of 15 assemblies being considered, and the requirement is to justify the assembly repair or discard decision on the basis of life-cycle-cost criteria.


Studi kasus 2 repair versus discard evaluation2

Studi Kasus 2 : Repair versus Discard Evaluation

  • The stated problem primarily pertains to the analysis of 15 major assemblies of the given computer system configuration to determine whether the assemblies should be repaired or discarded when failures occur. In other words, the various assemblies will be individually evaluated in terms of (1) assembly repair at the intermediate level of maintenance, (2) assembly repair at the supplier or depot level of maintenance, and (3) disposing of the assembly. Life-cycle costs, as applicable to the assembly level, will be developed and employed in the alternative selection process. Total overall computer system costs have been determined at a higher level, and are not included in this example.

  • The objective is to be consistent in analysis approach and in the use of input cost factors to the maximum extent possible and where appropriate.


Studi kasus 2 repair versus discard evaluation3

Studi Kasus 2 : Repair versus Discard Evaluation

  • The summary results for all 15 assemblies are presented in table 22.1


Tugas diskusi

TUGAS / Diskusi

Dari data yang diberikan,

  • Buatlah model operational requirement, maintenance concept, and program plan

  • Berikan rekomendasi untuk setiap item (dari A-1 sampai A-15) dalam mempertimbangkan maintenance cost

  • Menurut anda, pilihan mana yang terbaik dari ketiga alternatif biaya perbaikan (maintenance cost), dan mengapa pilihan tersebut yang anda pilih.

  • Diskusikan dalam kelompok dan kemudian dipresentasikan pada pertemuan berikutnya


  • Login