Slide1 l.jpg
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 53

Learning Science/Mathematics by Doing Science/Mathematics PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: General

Learning Science/Mathematics by Doing Science/Mathematics. Bill Sofer Dept. Genetics Waksman Institute Rutgers. Learning Modern Biological Science by Doing Modern Biological Science. Bill Sofer Dept. Genetics Waksman Institute Rutgers. What’s the best way to learn science?.

Download Presentation

Learning Science/Mathematics by Doing Science/Mathematics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Slide1 l.jpg






Bill Sofer

Dept. Genetics

Waksman Institute


Slide2 l.jpg


Modern Biological Science



Modern Biological Science

Bill Sofer

Dept. Genetics

Waksman Institute


Slide3 l.jpg

What’s the best way to

learn science?

Slide4 l.jpg

I don’t know.

But, like many of you

I have drawn on my own experience

to come up with an answer (guess).

Slide5 l.jpg

My own experience is that I hardly learned any science in high school or college.

Slide6 l.jpg

I think that my idea of science at the time was that it was a thicket of facts, and that the job of the scientist was, by some mysterious process, to come up with more facts.

Slide7 l.jpg

When I wasn’t asleep, I was most interested in those facts that were relevant to practical matters like human health and technology.

Slide8 l.jpg

The words “creativity”, “excitement”, “taste”, and “beauty” weren’t ever mentioned in the science classroom.

Slide9 l.jpg

The most successful of my fellow classmates were those who memorized the most, did the most practice problems, and were the best at following instructions in the lab.

Slide10 l.jpg

I was shocked when I got to graduate school

(how and why I went to graduate school is another long story that is best left untold)

Slide11 l.jpg

I found people there who, while knowing a lot of facts, were most excited about what

wasn’t known.

(to some, what was known was boring, and they were clearly bored when they tried teaching it)

Slide12 l.jpg

These people found things out by “experiments”.

I was surprised to find that one purpose of experiments was to convince ones peers that what they had found was correct.

Slide13 l.jpg

Often they made mistakes.

Sometimes the most pursuasive scientists were the least right, and vice versa

Slide14 l.jpg

Science was being done by a community of people trying to figure out how the world worked by arguing with each other to find out who was right

Slide15 l.jpg

Therefore the contrast:

School -> emphasis on what is known; bow to authority

Science -> emphasis on what wasn’t known; fight with authority

Slide16 l.jpg


What’s the best way to learn science?

Slide17 l.jpg

I don’t know.

But I suggest that we might do better by having students engage in activities that are closer to the way that science is actually practiced rather than by doing the things that they do now.

Slide18 l.jpg

How do you do that?

Slide19 l.jpg

Let me present an example of one way

Slide20 l.jpg

The Waksman Student Scholars Program has been ongoing for 12+ years.

Slide21 l.jpg

Here’s how it works

Slide22 l.jpg

Students and their teachers come to the Waksman Institute during the month of July.

Two students and one teacher per school.

Slide23 l.jpg

There they are presented with a research problem.

Slide24 l.jpg

They learn the fundamentals of the problem in the summer, and during the academic year they recruit additional students and work on the problem in their schools.

Slide25 l.jpg

They come back to Rutgers six times during the year to report on their progress.

Slide26 l.jpg

At the end of the year, in June, they publish their results in the form of a poster presentation.

Slide27 l.jpg

The current research problem involves a little worm called C. remanei.

Slide28 l.jpg

It looks very much like the worm C. elegans, a widely used “model” organism.

Slide29 l.jpg


How closely are the two worms related?

Slide30 l.jpg

One way to find that out is through their DNA’s.

We cloned a collection of DNA pieces from C. remanei and gave individual clones to different schools

Slide31 l.jpg

The C. elegans genome had already been sequenced

(it was the first multicellular organism whose sequence was known)

Slide32 l.jpg

At each school, teams of students carried out some of the laboratory manipulations of molecular biology

Slide33 l.jpg

Ultimately, the DNA from their clones were sequenced

(thanks to GE Healthcare) and the students analyzed the results

Slide34 l.jpg

Their raw data looks like this:

Slide36 l.jpg

No one knew what would turn up.

Slide37 l.jpg

Students (and their teachers) had to deal with questions like these:

Slide38 l.jpg

How accurate is the sequence?

How would you increase its accuracy?

Slide39 l.jpg

Is the same or similar sequence found in the genome of C. remanei?

What tools are available to do these similarity searches?

How do they work?

Slide40 l.jpg

How do you measure similarity?

If you find a similarity, what is the best alignment between the two sequences?

Is there a best alignment?

How do you find it?

Slide41 l.jpg

If they find a similar sequence, what are the odds of finding that match (similarity) by chance?

What does it depend on?

Slide42 l.jpg

Does the sequence code for a protein?

How do you know?

How could you find out?

Slide43 l.jpg

Can you do an alignment of the protein sequences?

What’s the advantage (disadvantage) of doing an alignment of strings with 20 different characters as opposed to one with four characters?

Slide44 l.jpg

How many sequences would you have to compare before you were confident that you were getting a good estimate of the similarity between the two organisms?

Slide45 l.jpg

Why might two sequences

(A in remanei and A’ in elegans; B in remanei and B’ in elegans) show different amounts of similarity?

Slide46 l.jpg

One could go on and on...

Slide47 l.jpg

Some students were able to actually publish their sequences. That is they submitted their sequences to Genbank and had them accepted.

They got their names in the literature.

Slide48 l.jpg

Does this work educationally?

Do students learn more?

Do all students profit from this experience?

Slide49 l.jpg

I don’t know.

Slide50 l.jpg

What I do know is that they’re getting a taste of science that is much closer to the real thing.

Slide51 l.jpg

We’re trying to develop a nationwide program to implement this program:


The High School Genome Sequencing Project

Slide52 l.jpg

Waksman Student Scholars Program

Drew Vershon

Marty Nemeroff

Susan Coletta

Jeff Charney

Slide53 l.jpg

Waksman Student Scholars Program

Supported by:



Howard Hughes

GE Healthcare

  • Login