NC STATE UNIVERSITY
Download
1 / 66

Radioactive Particle Tracking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 665 Views
  • Updated On :

NC STATE UNIVERSITY NUCLEAR ENGINEERIG DEPARTMENT CENTER FOR ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF RADIOISOTOPES RADIOACTIVE PARTICLE TRACKING IN PEBBLE BED REACTORS By Prof. R. P. Gardner and Ashraf Shehata A R E C TOPICS Introduction Review of RPT Techniques

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Radioactive Particle Tracking' - jacob


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

NC STATE UNIVERSITY

NUCLEAR ENGINEERIG DEPARTMENT

CENTER FOR ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF RADIOISOTOPES

RADIOACTIVE PARTICLE TRACKING IN PEBBLE BED REACTORS

By

Prof. R. P. Gardner and Ashraf Shehata

A

R

E

C


Slide2 l.jpg

TOPICS

  • Introduction

  • Review of RPT Techniques

  • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

    • The Dual Energy Approach

    • The Nonlinear Inverse Analysis Approach

    • Monte Carlo Simulated Results

    • Experimental Results

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide3 l.jpg

    INTRODUCTION

    • ORIGIN:Developed Primarily by Chemical

    • Engineers

    • USES:Flow Characterization of Chemical

    • and Mineral Processes

    • EXPECTATIONS:

      • Potential for Benchmarking CFD Calculations

      • Potential for Combining RTD and CFD

      • Potential for Flow Characterization and Mapping of Fuel Pebbles In a Pebble Bed Reactor

      • Potential for Combining Flow Characterization andResidence Time Distribution Calculations

        for optimized Fuel Cycles

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide4 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Semi-Empirical Modeling

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Modeling

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide5 l.jpg

    REVIEW OF PREVIOUS WORK

    • Extensive Review by Larachi, Chaouki, Kennedy, and Dudukovic: Chap.11: RadioactiveParticle Tracking in Multiphase Reactors: Principles and Applications in NON-INVASIVE MONITORING OF MULTIPHASE FLOWS, Elsevier Science, 1996

    • Linearization of Inverse Solution

    • First “full-flow-field” particle velocities in multiphase reactors were by Kondukov et al. (1964), Borlai et al. (1967), and van Velzen et al. (1974)

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide6 l.jpg

    REVIEW OF PREVIOUS WORK

    • University of Illinois System, 1983

    • Florida Atlantic University, 1990

    • Washington University, 1990

    • Ecole Polytechnique of Montreal, 1994

    • Gatt at AAEC Research Establishment, 1977, Flow of Individual Pebbles in Cylindrical Vessels, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 42, 265-275 – missed in review

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide7 l.jpg

    REVIEW OF PREVIOUS WORK

    • CURRENT APPROACHES:

      • Based Primarily on “TOMOGRAPHIC” Imaging, in which an Array of Detectors is Assembled Around the System.

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide8 l.jpg

    REVIEW OF PREVIOUS WORK

    GATT, 1

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide9 l.jpg

    REVIEW OF PREVIOUS WORK

    GATT, 2

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide10 l.jpg

    REVIEW OF PREVIOUS WORK

    GATT, 3

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide11 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Semi-Empirical Modeling

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Modeling

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide12 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Radioactive Particle Tracking in a Ball Mill

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide13 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Top View

    10 cm

    4 cm

    6 cm

    6 cm

    10 cm

    Sources

    Detector 1

    Detector 3

    25.4 cm

    25.5 cm

    5 cm

    5 cm

    Detector 2

    Detector 4

    Four Detectors, Dual Energy RPT Experiment

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide14 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Semi-Empirical Modeling

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Modeling

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide15 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    The Dual Energy Approach

    • A radioactive particle with two “clean” energies is used – Co-60, Sc-46, Na-24

    • Either two SCA’s with a “window” in each or an MCA with two ROI’s can be used for each detector –> doubling the data available from the same number of detectors

    • The additional data can be placed directly into the least-squares analysis

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide16 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Semi-Empirical Modeling

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Modeling

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide17 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Y

    Detector 4

    X

    Z

    Particle Trajectory

    Radioactive Particle

    Detector 3

    Detector 1

    Detector 2

    Experimental Results:

    Experiment Schematic

    • System Chosen for Study was Ball Mill

    • Four 2” X 2” NaI Detectors were Used

    • A Sparrow 4-channel system with MCA’s was Used

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide18 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Y

    Detector 4

    X

    Z

    Particle Trajectory

    Radioactive Particle

    Detector 3

    Detector 1

    Detector 2

    Experimental Results:

    Responses For The Four Detectors

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide19 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Semi-Empirical Modeling

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Modeling

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide20 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Experimental Results:

    Analytical Nonlinear Model

    Where; Ci=total photopeak counts of ith detector,

    ri=distance from tracer to ith detector,

    R=attenuation of mill wall and charge,

    SR=distance traveled in wall and charge,

    D =attenuation in detector,

    SD=distance traveled in detector,

    B = background,

    A = a constant proportional to the source

    intensity.

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide21 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Experimental Results:

    Measurements Vs. Model

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide22 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Experimental Results:

    Measurements Vs. Model

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide23 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Inverse Analysis Approach

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Results

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide24 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Monte Carlo Simulated Results:

    • The Expected Value Approach Was Used

    • One can Force Every Gamma Ray to be Detected so only a few are required

    • Needed Limiting Subtended Angles to Cylinder: Gardner, Choi, Mickael, Yacout, Jin, and Verghese, 1987, Algorithms for Forcing Scattered Radiation to Spherical, Planar Circular, and Right Circular Cylindrical Detectors for Monte Carlo Simulation, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 95, 245-256

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide25 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Monte Carlo Simulated Results:

    Schematic of a NaI Detector in an Attenuating Column

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide26 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Monte Carlo Simulated Results:

    Need Limiting Angle !!

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide27 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Monte Carlo Simulated Results:

    Monte Carlo Map of Counting Rates of one Detector VS. Tracer Position

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide28 l.jpg

    PREVIOUS WORK ON RPT at CEAR

    Monte Carlo Simulated Results:

    Monte Carlo Simulated Vs. Experimental Results

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide29 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Results

      • The Nonlinear Inverse Analysis Approach

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • Discussion and Conclusions

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide30 l.jpg

    CRITIQUE ON PREVIOUS WORK

    • Discrepancies Between Measurements and Monte Carlo Modeling:

    • This is Mainly Due to Information Distortion Due to Counting Losses Typical to High CountingRate Systems (Dead Time, Pulse Pileup,..)

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide31 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Inverse Analysis Approach

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Results

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide32 l.jpg

    MODULAR HIGH TEMPERATURE PEBBLE BED RECTOR

    • Helium Cooled

    • “Indirect” Cycle

    • 8 % Enriched Fuel

    • Can be Built in

    • 2 Years

    • Factory Built

    • Site Assembled

    • On-line Refueling

    • Highly Modular

    • (Modules added to meet demand)

    • High Burnup >90,000 Mwd/MT

    • Direct Disposal of High Level Waste

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide33 l.jpg

    MODULAR HIGH TEMPERATURE PEBBLE BED RECTOR

    For A 110 MWe:

    • 360,000 pebbles in core

    • about 3,000 pebbles handled

    • by Fuel Handling System Daily

    • about 350 discarded daily

    • one pebble discharged every

    • 30 seconds

    • average pebble cycles through

    • core 15 times

    • Fuel handling most maintenance-intensive

    • part of plant

    German AVR Pebble Bed Reactor

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide34 l.jpg

    MODULAR HIGH TEMPERATURE PEBBLE BED RECTOR

    TRISO Fuel Particle; (Microsphere)

    • 0.9mm diameter

    • ~ 11,000 in every pebble

    • 109 microspheres in core

    • Fission products retained inside microsphere

    • TRISO acts as a pressure vessel

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide35 l.jpg

    MODULAR HIGH TEMPERATURE PEBBLE BED RECTOR

    International Activities:

    • China - 10 Mwth Pebble Bed - 2000 critical

    • Japan - 40 Mwth Prismatic

    • South Africa - 250 Mwth Pebble Bed- 2003

    • Russia - 330 Mwe - Pu Burner Prismatic 2007

    • Netherlands - small industrial Pebble

    • Germany 300 Mwe Pebble Bed (Shut down)

    • MIT - 250 Mwth - Intermediate Heat Exch.

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide36 l.jpg

    MODULAR HIGH TEMPERATURE PEBBLE BED RECTOR

    Application Of (RPT) To Pebble Tracking:

    • Excessive Time Spent In Parts Of The Bed Could Result In Severe Irradiation And Thermal Damage To The Pebble

    • The Feasibility Of The Recycling Of Fuel Pebbles In a Pebble Bed Reactor Depends On a satisfactory Pebble Flow Through The Vessel, Its Outlet, and The Pebble Extractor

    • So It Is Important To Know Pebble Pathways And Relative Velocities Through The Bed

    • There Is Need For technique To study the Dynamics Of Pebbles In a Pebble Bed Reactor

    • One Can Track pebbles In a Scaled Prototype

      Pebble Bed Reactor (RPT)

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide37 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Inverse Analysis Approach

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Results

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide38 l.jpg

    CRITIQUE ON PREVIOUS WORK

    • Large Number of Detectors is Needed For Reasonably Accurate Tracking :

    • Due to Inherent uncertainties Associated With Linear/Nonlinear Map Search, As much As Possible Redundant Information is Necessary For Sufficiently Accurate Particle Tracking. Thus a Large Number of Detectors is Needed Depending on the Size of The System To Be Investigated

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide39 l.jpg

    CRITIQUE ON PREVIOUS WORK

    • Expected Modeling Difficulties In Stochastic Heterogeneous Systems, Such As Pebble Bed Reactors.

    • Randomly Distributed Pebbles May Produce Large Amount of Contrast in Attenuation Between Different Particle Positions Corresponding To Same Distance From The Detector In Question, Specially At The Container Wall Region

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide40 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Review of RPT Techniques

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • The Nonlinear Inverse Analysis Approach

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Results

  • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide41 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    OBJECTIVES

    • Investigate An Improved RPT Approach to Overcome Current Approach Limitations :

      • Eliminate Information Distortion Due to Counting Losses Typical to High CountingRate Systems (Dead Time, Pulse Pileup,..)

      • Reduce number of Detectors Needed

      • Overcome Modeling Difficulties of Heterogeneous Stochastic Attenuating Media Such as Pebble Bed Reactors

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide42 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    OBJECTIVES

    • Investigate An Improved RPT Approach to Overcome Current Approach Limitations :

      • Eliminate Information Distortion Due to Counting Losses Typical to High CountingRate Systems (Dead Time, Pulse Pileup,..)

      • Reduce number of Detectors Needed

      • Overcome Modeling Difficulties of Heterogeneous Stochastic Attenuating Media Such as Pebble Bed Reactors

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide43 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Overview of The Concept

    • The Concept is Based on Dynamic Motion Control of a Cluster of Three Very Well CollimatedDetectors

    • The Detectors are Mounted on a Platform Whose Height Can be Varied

    • The Center Detector (With a Horizontal Slit) is Used to Directly Establish the Vertical Position of the Tracer

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide44 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Overview of The Concept

    • The Two Outer Detectors are Independently Rotated To Align With The Tracer (Line of Sight Position)

    • The Angles 1 and 2 are Instantaneously Recorded Providing The Two Cylindrical Coordinates r and 

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide45 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Coordinates Determination

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide46 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Coordinates Determination

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide47 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Coordinates Determination

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide48 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Sensitivity of Determined Coordinates To Measured Angles

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide49 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Detector Response to Particle Position

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide50 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Detector Response to Particle Position

    • The Accuracy and Resolution of the

    • Particle Positions are determined Primarily

    • by Two Factors:

      • How Well Resolved

    • Detector Response

    • Maximum.

      • The Precession and Accuracy of the Physical Dimensions of the Tracking System.

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide51 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Design Optimization Of Collimator

    Using Monte Carlo Simulation to Optimize the

    Design of the Collimator:

    • Effect of Slit Width

    • Effect of the Slit Depth

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide52 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    d

    R

    b

    W

    a

    c

    e

    R

    S

    D

    Effect Of Collimator Parameters On Accuracy and Resolution

    • Triangles abc and ade

    • are similar. Thus;

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide53 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    d

    R

    b

    W

    a

    c

    e

    R

    S

    D

    Effect Of Collimator Parameters On Accuracy and Resolution

    • ROV is to be Minimized

      • Thus Minimize W, and Maximize D

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide54 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Effect Of Collimator Parameters On Accuracy and Resolution

    • Collimator 1:

      • W= 3mm, & D= 25.4mm; Thus for S=100mm:

      • ROV= 26.6mm

    • Collimator 2:

      • W= 1mm, & D= 50.8mm; Thus for S= 100mm:

      • ROV= 4.94mm

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide55 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Effect Of Collimator Parameters On Accuracy and Resolution

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide56 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Design Optimization Of Collimator

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide57 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Design Optimization Of Collimator

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide58 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Implementation Of The Concept

    • Precision Manufactured Platform, and Collimators

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide59 l.jpg

    ALTERNATIVE APPROACH FOR RPT

    Implementation Of The Concept

    • Computer Controlled Micro-Stepping Stepper

      Motors (Up to 0.18 Degrees Per Step).

    • Programmable Automation and Control System

      (National Instruments LabView)

    • Development of a Graphical User Interface (GUI)

      LabView Program, for Experiment Automation,

      Control, and Visualization.

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide60 l.jpg

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide61 l.jpg

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide62 l.jpg

    TOPICS

    • Introduction

    • Introduction To Pebble Bed Reactor

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT

    • Review of Previous Work on RPT at CEAR

      • The Dual Energy Approach

      • Experimental Results

      • Monte Carlo Simulated Results

      • The Nonlinear Inverse Analysis Approach

  • Critique on Previous Work

  • An Alternative Approach for RPT

  • Discussion and Conclusions

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide63 l.jpg

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

    • The Dual Energy Approach Was Useful As It Uses Additional Already Available Data

    • The Nonlinear Inverse Analysis Approach Gave Much Better Accuracy, Than Monte Carlo Mapping

    • Discrepancies Between Monte Carlo Simulation and Experiment Raised Due to Information Distortions Pertinent to High Counting Rate (Dead Time, and Pulse Pileup)

    • A Simpler And More Efficient Alternative Was Needed Particularly for Tracking Pebbles In A Pebble Bed Reactor Vessel.

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide64 l.jpg

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

    • The Approach Proved to Be Valid In General.

    • The Concept Has Remarkable Advantages Over the Current RPT Techniques;

      • Much Less Number of Detectors Needed For Tracking (Only 3)

      • Only Simple Radiation Detection Needed, Based on Measuring Only The Counting

      • Rate of Each Detector, and Identify Their Maxima. This would avoid

      • Measurement Complications,

      • such as Pulse Pile Up,

      • and Dead Time Losses

    A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide65 l.jpg

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

    • The Concept Eliminates The Need for Complicated, and Time Consuming Modeling and Computations, and Thus It is Most Ideal for Real Time Online RPT.

  • However, The Technique Has Some Limitations.

    • The Limited Speed of The Tracker, Particularly in

    • The Vertical Direction, Because of the Heavy

    • Mechanical Load

  • A

    R

    E

    C


    Slide66 l.jpg

    Thank You

    A

    R

    E

    C


    ad