1 / 27

Relevant Costs for Decision Making

Relevant Costs for Decision Making. Identifying Relevant Costs. Costs that can be eliminated (in whole or in part) by choosing one alternative over another are avoidable costs. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. Unavoidable costs are never relevant and include: Sunk costs.

Download Presentation

Relevant Costs for Decision Making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Relevant Costs for Decision Making

  2. Identifying Relevant Costs Costs that can be eliminated (in whole or in part) by choosing one alternative overanother areavoidablecosts. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. Unavoidable costs are never relevant and include: • Sunk costs. • Future costs thatdo not differbetween the alternatives.

  3. $1.60 per gallon ÷ 32 MPG $45 per month × 8 months $18,000 cost – $4,000 salvage value ÷ 5 years Identifying Relevant Costs Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York. She can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’s apartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensive and has gathered the following information:

  4. Identifying Relevant Costs

  5. Identifying Relevant Costs From a financial standpoint, Cynthia would be better off taking the train to visit her friend. Some of the non-financial factor may influence her final decision.

  6. Adding/Dropping Segments One of the most important decisions managers make is whether to add or drop a business segment such as a product or a store. Let’s see how relevant costs should be used in this decision.

  7. Adding/Dropping Segments Discount Drug Company has three major product lines: drugs, cosmetics and housewares. The last one has not reported a profit for the last two years. An income statement for last year is shown on the next screen.

  8. Adding/Dropping Segments

  9. Adding/Dropping Segments Salaries expense represent direct labor, all employees would be discharged if the product line is dropped. The advertising expense is product-specific. Utilities expense is firm-level, allocated based on space used, it is not avoidable if the segment is dropped. The equipment that is being depreciating has no resale value. Rent is for the entire building housing the company, allocated to products based on dollar sales. It is fixed, under a long-term lease. Insurance is product-specific. General administrative expense would be unaffected by the discontinuation of any segment.

  10. A Contribution Margin Approach DECISION RULE A segment should be discontinued only if the company’s profit would increase. This would only happen if the fixed cost savings exceed the lost contribution margin. Let’s look at this solution.

  11. A Contribution Margin Approach

  12. The Make or Buy Decision A decision concerning whether an item should be produced internally or purchased from an outside supplier is called a “make or buy” decision. Let’s look at the Mountain Goat Cycles example.

  13. The Make or Buy Decision • Mountain Goat Cycles manufactures gear shifters used in one of its products. • The unit product cost of this part is:

  14. The Make or Buy Decision • The special equipment used to manufacture gear-shifters has no resale value. • The total amount of general factory overhead, which is allocated on the basis of direct labor hours, would be unaffected by this decision. • The $30 unit product cost is based on 8,000 parts produced each year. • An outside supplier has offered to provide the 8,000 parts at a cost of $19 per part.Should we accept the supplier’s offer?

  15. The Make or Buy Decision 8,000 × $4 per unit = $32,000

  16. The Make or Buy Decision DECISION RULE In deciding whether to accept the outside supplier’s offer, Mountain Goat Cycles isolated the relevant costs of making the part by eliminating: • The sunk costs. • The future costs that will not differ between making or buying the parts.

  17. Opportunity Cost The benefits that are foregone as a result of pursuing some course of action. Opportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays and are not recorded in the formal accounts of an organization.

  18. Quick Check  Which of the following are opportunity costs of attending the university? a. Tuition. b. Books. c. Lost wages. d. Not enough time for other interests.

  19. Special Orders • Jet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal selling price is $20 per unit. • A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10 per unit. • This is a one-time order that would not affect the company’s regular business. • Annual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currently producing and selling only 5,000 units. Should Jet accept the offer?

  20. $8 variable cost Special Orders

  21. Special Orders If Jet accepts the offer, net operating income will increase by $6,000. Note: This answer assumes that fixed costs are unaffected by the order and that variable marketing costs must be incurred on the special order.

  22. Quick Check  Northern Optical ordinarily sells the X-lens for $50. The variable production cost is $10, the fixed production cost is $18 per unit, and the variable selling cost is $1. A customer has requested a special order for 10,000 units of the X-lens to be imprinted with the customer’s logo. This special order would not involve any selling costs, but Northern Optical would have to purchase an imprinting machine for $50,000. (see the next page)

  23. Quick Check  What is the rock bottom minimum price below which Northern Optical should not go in its negotiations with the customer? In other words, below what price would Northern Optical actually be losing money on the sale? There is ample idle capacity to fulfill the order. a. $50 b. $10 c. $15 d. $29

  24. Quick Check  Colonial Heritage makes reproduction colonial furniture from select hardwoods. The company’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is this enough hardwood to satisfy demand? a. Yes b. No

  25. Quick Check  The company’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. What plan would maximize profits? a. 500 chairs and 100 tables b. 600 chairs and 80 tables c. 500 chairs and 80 tables d. 600 chairs and 100 tables

  26. Quick Check  As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Assume the company follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay above the usual price to obtain more hardwood? a. $40 per board foot b. $25 per board foot c. $20 per board foot d. Zero

  27. Sell or Process Further It will always be profitable to continue processing a joint product after the split-off point so long as the incremental revenue exceeds the incremental processing costs incurred after the split-off point.

More Related