Loading in 5 sec....

Molecular Modeling Techniques are a Critical Component of Determining a Protein Structure by NMR:PowerPoint Presentation

Molecular Modeling Techniques are a Critical Component of Determining a Protein Structure by NMR:

Download Presentation

Molecular Modeling Techniques are a Critical Component of Determining a Protein Structure by NMR:

Loading in 2 Seconds...

- 112 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Molecular Modeling Techniques are a Critical Component of Determining a Protein Structure by NMR:

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Modeling Techniques are a Critical Component of Determining a Protein Structure by NMR:
- Protein structures are calculated by augmenting traditional modeling functions with experimental NMR data

- Molecular Modeling/Molecular Mechanicsis a method to calculate the structure and energy of molecules based on nuclear motions.
- electrons are not considered explicitly
- will find optimum distribution once position of nuclei are known
- Born-Oppenheimer approximation of Shrödinger equation
- nuclei are heavier and move slower than electrons
- nuclear motions (vibrations, rotations) can be studied separately
- electrons move fast enough to adjust to any nuclei movement

molecular modeling treats a molecule as a collection of weights connected with springs, where the weights represent the nuclei and the springs represent the bonds.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Force Field used to calculate the energy and geometry of a molecule.
- Collection of atom types (to define the atoms in a molecule), parameters (for bond lengths, bond angles, etc.) and equations (to calculate the energy of a molecule)
- In a force field, a given element may have several atom types.
- For example, phenylalanine contains both sp3-hybridized carbons and aromatic carbons.
- sp3-Hybridized carbons have a tetrahedral bonding geometry
- aromatic carbons have a trigonal bonding geometry.
- C-C bond in the ethyl group differs from a C-C bond in the phenyl ring
- C-C bond between the phenyl ring and the ethyl group differs from all other C-C
bonds in ethylbenzene. The force field contains parameters for these different

types of bonds.

- For example, phenylalanine contains both sp3-hybridized carbons and aromatic carbons.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Force Field used to calculate the energy and geometry of a molecule.
- Total energy of a molecule is divided into several parts called force potentials, or potential
- energy equations.
- Force potentials are calculated independently, and summed to give the total energy of the
- molecule.
- Examples of force potentials are the equations for the energies associated with bond
stretching, bond bending, torsional strain and van der Waals interactions.

- These equations define the potential energy surface of a molecule.

- Examples of force potentials are the equations for the energies associated with bond

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Bonds Length)
- Whenever a bond is compressed or stretched the energy goes up.
- The energy potential for bond stretching and compressing is described by an equation
- similar to Hooke's law for a spring.
- Sum over two atoms
- lo – expected/natural bond length
- kl – force constant
- l – actual/observed bond length

Sum over all bonds in the structure

From what we know about protein structures what we have been discussing up to this point

From the structure

Plot of Potential Energy Function for Bond Length

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Angles)
- As the bond angle is bent from the norm, the energy goes up.
- Sum over three atoms
- fo – expected/natural bond angle
- kf – force constant
- f– actual/observed bond angle

Sum over all bond angles in the structure

From what we know about protein structures what we have been discussing up to this point

From the structure

Plot of Potential Energy Function for Bond Angle

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Improper Dihedrals)
- As the improper dihedral is bent from the norm, the energy goes up.
- Sum over four atoms
- wo – expected improper dihedral (usually set to 0o)
- kw – force constant
- w– actual/observed improper dihedral

Sum over all improper dihedrals in the structure

Plot of Potential Energy Function for Improper Dihedrals (wo = 0)

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Dihedral Angles)
- As the dihedral angle is bent from the norm, the energy goes up.
- The torsion potential is a Fourier series that accounts for all 1-4 through-bond
- relationships
- Sum over four atoms
- fo – expected improper dihedral
- An – force constant for each Fourier term
- – actual/observed improper dihedral
n – multiplicity (same parameter seen in the XPLOR constraint file)

Sum over all

dihedrals in the structure

…

Fourier Series

Plot of Potential Energy Function for Dihedrals

Multiple minima

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Dihedral Angles)
- Need to include higher terms non-symmetric bonds
- Distinguish trans, gauche conformations

- Need to include higher terms non-symmetric bonds

Different multiplicities identify which torsion angles are energetically equivalent

For c1, 60, -60 & 180 are all equivalent and should yield 0 torsion energy

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Nonbonded interactions)
- van der waals interaction
- Act only at very short distances
- Attractive interaction by induced dipoles between uncharged
atoms ~r6

- When atoms get too close, valence shell start to overlap and
repel ~r12

- van der waals interaction

Van der Waals potential energy function

Than becomes repulsive

Interaction first attractive

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Nonbonded interactions)
- electrostatic interaction
- Electrostatic interaction of charged atoms
- Long-range forces
- Coulomb’s Law

- electrostatic interaction

Coulomb’s Law

Positive interaction that inversely increases distance

Negative interaction if of the same charge

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Nonbonded interactions)
- electrostatic interaction
- Problem defining dielectric constant (e)
- dielectric constant differs in solvent and protein interior
- eprotein ~ 2-4
- esolvent ~80

- For protein calculations using NMR constraints, typically
turn electrostatics off

- How to properly define solvent, buffers, salts, etc?
- Can explicitly define solvent increases complexity
of calculations.

- With electrostatics off during the structure
calculations, can use the potential energy calculation

after the fact to determine the quality of the NMR

structure

- electrostatic interaction

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (Nonbonded interactions)
- electrostatic interaction
- Problem defining dielectric constant (e)
- Don’t use electrostatic potential energy during structure calculation
- Use a single dielectric constant
- eprotein ~ 2-4; esolvent ~80

- Use explicit solvent in structure calculation
- Improved structure quality
- Increased computational time
- Properly defining solvent
- Properly defining force fields
behavior in solvent

- Problem defining dielectric constant (e)

- electrostatic interaction

PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics 50:496–506 (2003)

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- The Potential Energy Function Not Sufficient to Fold A Protein
- it is not even sufficient to keep a folded structure folded.

Dynamic simulations, even with the “best” force fields, ALWAYS results in the structure drifting away from the original NMR, X-ray, or homology model

GDT-TS – measure of percent similarity to original structure

Proteins 2012; 80:2071–2079

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Why Is the Potential Energy Function Not Sufficient to Fold A Protein?
- It is Not A complete function
- primarily short-range geometry with many equal solutions
- VDW and electrostatics only contribute over short distances
- How do you bring distant regions of the primary chain into contact?

- Too many possible conformations
- 3N where N is the number of amino acids

- Other factors that drive the protein folding process
- hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen-bond formation, secondary structure interactions (helix

- dipole), effects of solvent, compactness of structure, etc
- How do you define a mathematical equation defining these contributions?

- It is Not A complete function

Improving the Potential Energy Function, improving the parameters and defining alternative ab inito methods of folding a protein are major areas of Molecular Modeling research.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- One Way to View an NMR Protein Structure Determination Is as a Hybrid Modeled Structure
- NMR structure calculations modify the standard potential energy function to include NMR
- experimental constraints
- distance constraints (NOEs)
- dihedral constraints (NOEs, coupling constants, chemical shifts)
- chemical shifts (1H, 13C)
- residual dipolar coupling constants (RDCs)

- Recently, additional potential functions have been added that are not NMR experimental
- constraints but are developed by analyzing databases and structural trends.
- Controversial
- not true experimental data
- but similar to other parameterized geometric functions (bond length, angles etc)

- bias structures to structures in PDB
- but this is the criteria used to determine the quality of a protein structure

- not true experimental data

ETOTAL = Echem + wexpEexp

Eexp = ENOE + Etorsion + EH-bond + Egyr + Erama + ERDC + ECSA + Epara

Echem = Ebond + Eangle + Edihedral + Evdw + Eelectr

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Ramachandran Database
- similar in concept to bond length, bond angle, etc. parameters but directed to f, y, c1
& c2.

- based on observed values in the PDB.

- similar in concept to bond length, bond angle, etc. parameters but directed to f, y, c1
- Radius of Gyration
- based on observed trends in the PDB related to sequence length
- tries to improve the compactness of NMR structures
- general tendency of a structure in the absence of explicit solvent to move towards an
open/expanded chain conformation

- Empirical Backbone-Backbone Bonding Potential
- based on observed trends in the PDB related to hydrogen bonds in secondary
structures and long range isolated H-bonds.

- optimizes h-bond distance and angle parameters

- based on observed trends in the PDB related to hydrogen bonds in secondary

Convergence of NMR structure

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- distance constraint (NOE)
- target distance with upper and lower bounds

- distance constraint (NOE)

assign ( resid 14 and name HD* ) ( resid 97 and name HD* ) 4.0 2.2 3.0

No contribution to the overall potential energy if the distance between the atoms is between the upper and lower bounds of the NOE constraint

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

.

.

.

noe

reset

nrestraints = 20000

ceiling 100

class all

@noe.tbl

averaging all cent

potential all square

scale all $knoe

sqconstant all 1.0

sqexponent all 2

end

.

.

.

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- distance constraint (NOE)
- Sample XPLOR Script

- distance constraint (NOE)

assign ( resid 2 and name HA ) ( resid 2 and name HG2# ) 4.0 2.2 1.6assign ( resid 2 and name HA ) ( resid 3 and name HN ) 2.5 0.7 1.0assign ( resid 2 and name HA ) ( resid 3 and name HD1# ) 4.0 2.2 2.0assign ( resid 2 and name HA ) ( resid 3 and name HD2# ) 4.0 2.2 2.0assign ( resid 2 and name HA ) ( resid 100 and name HB# ) 4.0 2.2 2.0assign ( resid 2 and name HG2# ) ( resid 3 and name HN ) 4.0 2.2 2.0assign ( resid 2 and name HG2# ) ( resid 3 and name HD* ) 4.0 2.2 4.4assign ( resid 2 and name HG2# ) ( resid 100 and name HB# ) 4.0 2.2 3.0assign ( resid 2 and name HG2# ) ( resid 103 and name HN ) 4.0 2.2 2.0

.

.

.

Sets-up the NOE target function and clears any existing constraints

Defines the number of constraints and sets the maximal violation energy for a single constraint

Assigns a class name to constraints and reads in file containing distance constraints. Can read in multiple files with different class labels. Allows flexibility to treat different classes of NOEs differently.

Defines how distances and energies are calculated

Which NOE class

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- distance constraint (NOE)
- Sample XPLOR Script
- Averaging – determines how the distance between the
selected sets of atoms (pseudoatoms) is calculated.

- Averaging – determines how the distance between the

- Sample XPLOR Script

- distance constraint (NOE)

Scaling factor for ambiguous peaks in symmetric multimers

R-6 dependence of NOE

AVERAGE = R-6

AVERAGE = R-3

AVERAGE = SUM

Average of all possible distance combinations

Eq.

if two distances 3 and 10 Å

((3-6 + 10-6)/2)-1/6 = 3.37 Å

Sum of all possible distance combinations

Eq.

if two distances 3 and 10 Å

(3-6 + 10-6)-1/6 = 2.99 Å

SUM is preferred over R-6 for ambiguous NOESY crosspeaks

AVERAGE = CENTER

Difference between geometric centers of atoms

(distance constraints have to be corrected for center averaging)

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- distance constraint (NOE)
- Sample XPLOR Script
- Averaging

- Sample XPLOR Script

- distance constraint (NOE)

Which is Best (R-6, SUM,CENTER)? Point of Discussion in NMR Community

Different upper/lower limits from Val H’s to Hg1 depending on various distance averaging

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- distance constraint (NOE)
- Sample XPLOR Script
- Potential – determines how the energies are calculated for violations of the distance constraints
- Square-Well Function is commonly used
- scale – determines magnitude of function (force constant) typically 20-50 kcal/mole
- ceiling– maximum violation energy per constraint

- Sample XPLOR Script

- distance constraint (NOE)

Soft-Square Function

Square-Well Function

Biharmonic Function

Switch point

Same flat region around target distance but violation energy for upper violations are reduced at a “switch” point.

Energy violation for any distance outside target distance

Flat region around target distance where violation energy is zero. Equal energy for upper/lower violations

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- distance constraint (NOE)
- An even “softer” approach suggests refinement directly against intensities based on a log-normal distribution
- IMPORTANT - measurements are not weighted equally but are penalized depending on the degree of disagreement with the structure
- No difference for refinements against intensities or distance

- distance constraint (NOE)

J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2005) 127, 16026

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Dihedral Angle Restraints
- target dihedral angle with upper and lower bounds
- similar to NOE square-well function
- difference in dihedral angle (f) has to account for circular
nature (0-360o) of angles

- Force constant (C) – determines the magnitude of the violation energies
- Scale (S) – overall weight factor (allows for changes in contribution to overall
violation energy during structure calculation

- Exponent (ed)– increases violation energies for larger differences in dihedral angles,
usually 2 for harmonics.

- Dihedral Angle Restraints

assign (resid 1 and name c ) (resid 2 and name n ) (resid 2 and name ca ) (resid 2 and name c ) 1.0 -93.57 30.0 2

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

.

.

.

restraints dihed

reset

scale $kcdi

nass = 10000

set message off echo off end

@dihed.tbl

set message on echo on end

end

.

.

.

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Dihedral constraints
- Sample Xplor script

!! g2

assign (resid 1 and name c ) (resid 2 and name n )

(resid 2 and name ca) (resid 2 and name c ) 1.0 70.0 20.0 2

!! k3

assign (resid 2 and name c ) (resid 3 and name n )

(resid 3 and name ca) (resid 3 and name c ) 1.0 60.0 30.0 2

!! f4

assign (resid 3 and name c ) (resid 4 and name n )

(resid 4 and name ca) (resid 4 and name c ) 1.0 -55.0 20.0 2

!! s5

assign (resid 4 and name c ) (resid 5 and name n )

(resid 5 and name ca) (resid 5 and name c ) 1.0 -65.0 30.0 2

!! q6

assign (resid 5 and name c ) (resid 6 and name n )

(resid 6 and name ca) (resid 6 and name c ) 1.0 -70.0 20.0 2

!! t7

assign (resid 6 and name c ) (resid 7 and name n )

(resid 7 and name ca) (resid 7 and name c ) 1.0 -105.0 30.0 2

.

.

.

Sets-up the dihedral target function and clears any existing constraints

Defines the number of constraints and sets the maximal violation energy for a single constraint

Reads in file containing dihedral constraints. Turns off message so Xplor output file doesn’t contain the reading of all the constraints

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Other NMR empirical constraints follow the same pattern as the NOE and dihedral angles
- a difference between the target and observed value determines a violation
- a force constant to scale the energy associated with the violation

- Other NMR empirical constraints follow the same pattern as the NOE and dihedral angles

Coupling Constants:

Residual Dipolar Coupling Constants:

Radius of Gyration:

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

.

.

.

couplings

nres 400

potential harmonic

class phi

degen 1

force 1.0

set echo off message off end

coefficients 6.98 -1.38 1.72 -60.0

@coup.tbl

class gly !for gly, don't know stereoassignement

degen 2

force 1.0 0.2

coefficients 6.98 -1.38 1.72 -60.0

@gly_coup.tbl

set echo on message on end

end

.

.

.

! T7

assign (resid 6 and name c ) (resid 7 and name n )

(resid 7 and name ca) (resid 7 and name c ) 9.7 0.5

! C8

assign (resid 7 and name c ) (resid 8 and name n )

(resid 8 and name ca) (resid 8 and name c ) 9.6 0.5

! Y9

assign (resid 8 and name c ) (resid 9 and name n )

(resid 9 and name ca) (resid 9 and name c ) 8.0 0.5

! N10

assign (resid 9 and name c ) (resid 10 and name n )

(resid 10 and name ca) (resid 10 and name c ) 7.5 0.5

! S11

assign (resid 10 and name c ) (resid 11 and name n )

(resid 11 and name ca) (resid 11 and name c ) 5.4 0.5

! A12

assign (resid 11 and name c ) (resid 12 and name n )

(resid 12 and name ca) (resid 12 and name c ) 8.0 0.5

.

.

.

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Coupling constant constraints
- Sample Xplor script

Sets-up the coupling target function defines maximum number of constraints and energy function shape (like NOE)

Defines the force constant , degeneracy and coefficients and reads in the experimental constraint files

Same for Gly residues, two HA protons, don’t know which is HA1 or HA2. Degeneracy accounts for this

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

.

.

.

collapse

assign (resid 1:111) 100.0 12.67

scale 1.0

end

.

.

.

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Radius of Gyration
- Sample Xplor script

Radius of gyration

Force constant

([2.2*(number residues)0.38]-0.5)

Turns on the radius of target function

Function will be applied to this residue range

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Empirical Backbone-Backbone Hydrogen Bond Constraints
- based on an empirical formula derived from high quality X-ray structures in the PDB
- violation energy is based on deviations from expected h-bond length (R) and angle (f)

- Empirical Backbone-Backbone Hydrogen Bond Constraints

Violation occurs if this term is not zero

(relationship between R and f)

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Empirical Backbone-Backbone Hydrogen Bond Constraints
- based on an empirical formula derived from high quality X-ray structures in the PDB
- violation energy is based on deviations from expected h-bond length (R) and angle (f)

- Empirical Backbone-Backbone Hydrogen Bond Constraints

.

!hb database must be read in after psf file

hbdb

kdir = 0.20 !force constant for directional term

klin = 0.08 !force constant for linear term (ca. Nico's hbda)

nseg = 1 ! number of segments that hbdb term is active on

nmin = 11 !range of residues (number of 1st residue in protein sequence)

nmax = 110 !range of residues (number of last residue in protein sequence )

ohcut = 2.60 !cut-off for detection of h-bonds

coh1cut = 100.0 !cut-off for c-o-h angle in 3-10 helix

coh2cut = 100.0 !cut-off for c-o-h angle for everything else

ohncut = 100.0 !cut-off for o-h-n angle

updfrq = 10 !update frequency usually 1000

prnfrq = 10 !print frequency usually 1000

freemode = 1 !mode= 1 free search

fixedmode = 0 !if you want a fixed list, set fixedmode=1, and freemode=0

mfdir = 0 ! flag that drives HB's to the minimum of the directional potential

mflin = 0 ! flag that drives HB's to the minimum of the linearity potential

kmfd = 10.0 ! corresp force const

kmfl = 10.0 ! corresp force const

renf = 2.30 ! forces all found HB's below 2.3 A

kenf = 30.0 ! corresponding force const

@HBDB:hbdb.inp

end

.

Excerpt of an XPLOR script illustrating how to implement empirical h-bond constraints

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

Expected Cb secondary shifts

f-1

f

y+1

f+1

y

y-1

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Carbon chemical shift constraint
- differences in expected and observed like NOE and dihedral
- not a continuous function
- “look-up” table with bins (10o) correlating f,y angles with Ca and Cb chemical shifts

- Carbon chemical shift constraint

Bins of expected chemical shift differences (relative to random coil chemical shifts) for Cb chemical shifts plotted as a function of (f,y)

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

.

.

.

carbon

phistep=180

psistep=180

nres=300

class all

force 0.5

potential harmonic

@rcoil.tbl !rcoil shifts

@expected_edited.tbl !13C shift database

set echo off message off end

@carbon.tbl !carbon shifts

set echo on message on end

end

.

.

.

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Carbon chemical shift constraints
- proton chemical shifts setup similarly

- Sample Xplor script

- Carbon chemical shift constraints

!! Q6

assign (resid 5 and name c ) (resid 6 and name n )

(resid 6 and name ca) (resid 6 and name c )

(resid 7 and name n ) 57.81 29.28

!! T7

assign (resid 6 and name c ) (resid 7 and name n )

(resid 7 and name ca) (resid 7 and name c )

(resid 8 and name n ) 60.70 69.29

!! C8

assign (resid 7 and name c ) (resid 8 and name n )

(resid 8 and name ca) (resid 8 and name c )

(resid 9 and name n ) 56.57 49.96

!! Y9

assign (resid 8 and name c ) (resid 9 and name n )

(resid 9 and name ca) (resid 9 and name c )

(resid 10 and name n ) 56.53 40.37

!! N10

assign (resid 9 and name c ) (resid 10 and name n )

(resid 10 and name ca) (resid 10 and name c )

(resid 11 and name n ) 53.56 36.29

.

.

.

Sets-up the dihedral target function and number of steps in expectation array

Defines the number of constraints, sets the class name (like NOE), the force constant and shape (like NOE)

Reads in standard tables for random coil carbon chemical shifts and expected secondary structure chemical shifts

Reads in experimental carbon chemical shifts constraint file

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

proton

class alpha

degeneracy 1

force $kprot

error 0.3

@alpha.tbl

class gly

degeneracy 2

force $kprot $kprotd

error 0.3

@alpha_degen.tbl

class md

degeneracy 2

force $kprot $kprotd

error 0.3

@methyl_degen.tbl

class ms

degeneracy 1

force $kprot

error 0.3

@methyl_single.tbl

class os

degeneracy 1

force $kprot

error 0.3

@other_single.tbl

class od

degeneracy 2

force $kprot $kprotd

error 0.3

@other_degen.tbl

end

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Proton chemical shift constraints
- similar to carbon chemical shifts
- Different class (file) for each type of proton
- Lists the observed chemical shifts

- Degeneracy is dependent on steroassignment
- 1 or 2 chemical shifts

- Error is conservative uncertainty in chemical shifts
- Square-well potential

- Sample Xplor script

- Proton chemical shift constraints

OBSE (resid 10 and (name HA)) 4.414

OBSE (resid 11 and (name HA)) 5.362

OBSE (resid 12 and (name HA)) 4.480

OBSE (resid 13 and (name HA)) 5.022

OBSE (resid 14 and (name HA)) 4.472

OBSE (resid 16 and (name HA)) 4.460

OBSE (resid 17 and (name HA)) 4.480

OBSE (resid 18 and (name HA)) 5.083

OBSE (resid 19 and (name HA)) 5.261

OBSE (resid 20 and (name HA)) 4.320

OBSE (resid 21 and (name HA)) 4.803

.

.

.

Kuszewski et al. (1995) Protein Sci. 107:293

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Ramachandran database constraint
- similar to carbon chemical shift constraints
- not a continuous function
- “look-up” table with bins (8o) correlating f,y, c1 &c2 angles with the probability of occurrence based on PROCHECK analysis of PDB

- Ramachandran database constraint

Violation energy is related to the probability of the observed f,y or c1,c2 pair occurring and comparison to neighboring bins.

Probability or number of observed occurrences for given pairs of dihedral angles

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Potential Energy Equation (NMR Constraints)
- Ramachandran database
- Sample Xplor script

.

.

.

Turns on the Ramachandran database function

set message off echo off end

rama

nres=10000

!intraresidue protein torsion angles

@/home/PROGRAMS/xplor-nih-2.9.1/databases/torsions_gaussians/shortrange_gaussians.tbl

@/home/PROGRAMS/xplor-nih-2.9.1/databases/torsions_gaussians/new_shortrange_force.tbl

!interresidue protein torsion angle correlations i with i+/-1

@/home/PROGRAMS/xplor-nih-2.9.1/databases/torsions_gaussians/longrange_gaussians.tbl

@/home/PROGRAMS/xplor-nih-2.9.1/databases/torsions_gaussians/longrange_4D_hstgp_force.tbl

end

@/home/PROGRAMS/xplor-nih-2.9.1/databases/torsions_gaussians/newshortrange_setup.tbl

@/home/PROGRAMS/xplor-nih-2.9.1/databases/torsions_gaussians/setup_4D_hstgp.tbl

Automatically sets-up all the expected torsion angles for the protein sequence

.

.

.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

For a Given Set of Atomic Coordinates, An Energy for the Structure Can Be Calculated Based on the Set of Potential Energy Functions

ETOTAL = Echem + wexpEexp

Eexp = ENOE + Etorsion + EH-bond + Egyr + Erama + ERDC + ECSA + Epara

Echem = Ebond + Eangle + Edihedral + Evdw + Eelectr

What Relationship Does This Energy Value Have to Any Experimental Observation?

NOTHING!

The energy value simply indicates how well the structure conforms to the expected parameters.

It does not indicate the relative stability of one protein to another.

It does not indicate the stability of the protein (DG).

Calculating a DE between the protein with/without a ligand does not indicate the binding affinity of the ligand or the induced stability of the complex

Do Not Over Interpret the Meaning of this Energy Function!

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

Consider These Facts About Correctly Folded Proteins:

- Typical free energies of protein denaturation (DGd) are ~ 10 kcal/mol
- implies the relative stability of the folded protein compared to the denatured (unfolded) protein

- In a native structure of a globular protein of 100 amino acids residues there might be:
- ~ 100 intramolecular hydrogen bonds
- ~ 10 salt links
- ~ 10 buried hydrophobic residues

- This apparently imparts a stability ca. -1000 kcal/mol to the folded state!
- The strength of interactions in the unfolded state must be very similar ( ca. -990 kcal/mol).

This suggests that an exceptionally high level of accuracy is needed to correctly analyze energies of different conformers and correctly predict the most stable structure.

ETOTAL = Echem + wexpEexp

Eexp = ENOE + Etorsion + EH-bond + Egyr + Erama + ERDC + ECSA + Epara

Echem = Ebond + Eangle + Edihedral + Evdw + Eelectr

We are currently far from this laudable goal.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

What Relationship Is There Between the Force Constants and Experimental Observations?

For geometric parameters (bonds, angles), force constants come from IR, raman spectroscopy and ab inito calculations.

For experimental parameters (NOE, dihedral), There is No Relationship!

Experimental force constants have been determined by “trial & error” or empirically to obtain a proper balance and weighted contribution of each experimental parameter to the calculated structure.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

What Do We Mean By a Proper Balance?

As example:

It is more desirable to have experimental values like NOEs to have more influence on the resulting structure than an empirical function like the Ramachandran database.

Thus, the force constant for distance constraints (kNOE) should be higher than the corresponding force constant for the Ramachandran database potential (KDB).

.

.

.

evaluate ($knoe = 25.0) ! noes

evaluate ($kcdi = 10.0) ! torsion angles

evaluate ($kcoup = 1.0) ! coupling constant

evaluate ($kcshift = 0.5) ! carbon chemical shifts

evaluate ($krgyr = 1.0) ! radius of gyration

evaluate ($krama = 1.0) ! intraresidue protein

evaluate ($kramalr = 0.15) ! long range protein

.

.

.

Typical values of experimental/empirical force constants in XPLOR scripts

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

What Do We Mean By a Proper Balance?

These Force Constants Are Not Absolute and Are Routinely Changed During a Structure Calculation

.

.

evaluate ($final_t = 100) { K }

evaluate ($tempstep = 50) { K }

evaluate ($ncycle = ($init_t-$final_t)/$tempstep)

evaluate ($nstep = int($cool_steps*2.5/$ncycle))

evaluate ($bath = $init_t)

evaluate ($k_vdw = $ini_con)

evaluate ($k_vdwfact = ($fin_con/$ini_con)^(1/$ncycle))

evaluate ($radius= $ini_rad)

evaluate ($radfact = ($fin_rad/$ini_rad)^(1/$ncycle))

evaluate ($k_ang = $ini_ang)

evaluate ($ang_fac = ($fin_ang/$ini_ang)^(1/$ncycle))

evaluate ($k_imp = $ini_imp)

evaluate ($imp_fac = ($fin_imp/$ini_imp)^(1/$ncycle))

evaluate ($noe_fac = ($fin_noe/$ini_noe)^(1/$ncycle))

evaluate ($knoe = $ini_noe)

evaluate ($kprot = $ini_prot)

evaluate ($prot_fac = ($fin_prot/$ini_prot)^(1/$ncycle))

.

.

Excerpt of an XPLOR script illustrating how force constants are modified during a structure calculation

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

What Do We Mean By a Proper Balance?

Not Only can the Magnitude of the Force Constant be Modified During a Structure Calculation, but Specific Target Functions can be Either Turned Off or On During a Structure Calculation.

.

.

flags

exclude *

include bonds angles impropers vdw

end

.

.

flags

exclude *

include bond angle dihed impr vdw noe cdih carb rama coup coll

end

.

.

Turn off all target function

Excerpt of an XPLOR script illustrating how Target Functions are turned off and on.

Turn on the selected target function

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

10 Å

H

H

C

C

3 Å

H

H

C

C

What Do We Mean By a Proper Balance?

How can the force constant impact the structure calculation?

A Simple Illustration: incorrect distance constraint

C-H bond length of 1.1Å with 410 kcal/mol force constant

H-H distance constraint of 3.0 Å with 25 kcal/mol force (ceiling of 100 kcal/mol)

Distance constraint is violated (properly) with no distortion in bond lengths

C-H bond length of 1.1Å with 10 kcal/mol force constant

H-H distance constraint of 3.0 Å with 500 kcal/mol force

Want to Keep All Known Geometric Values Within Proper Ranges

Distance constraint is satisfied (improperly) with large distortion in bond lengths

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

How Do We Use the Energy Function To Calculate a Protein Structure?

ETOTAL = Echem + wexpEexp

Eexp = ENOE + Etorsion + EH-bond + Egyr + Erama + ERDC + ECSA + Epara

Echem = Ebond + Eangle + Edihedral + Evdw + Eelectr

Molecular Minimizationstarting from some structure (R), find its potential energy using the potential energy function given above. The coordinate vector R is then varied using an optimization procedure so as to minimize the potential energy ETOTAL(R).

Molecular Dynamics the motion of a molecule is simulated as a function of time. Newton's second law of motion is solved to find how the position for each atom of the system varies with time. To find the forces on each atom, the derivative vector (or gradient) of the potential energy function given above is calculated. Factors such as the temperature and pressure of the system can be included in the treatment.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

Anfinsen's Thermodynamic Hypothesis

- The native conformation of a protein is the conformation with the lowest free energy (DG)
- global minimum of the free energy surface.
- Rather difficult (and expensive) to calculate free energies
- by definition these involve averaging over a large number of conformations

- Primary sequence determines the protein fold.

In 1957, Anfinsen showed that denatured ribonuclease A (124 amino acids, 4 disulphides) produced in 8 M urea and reducing agent (b -mercaptoethanol) could be re-activated by dialysing out the denaturant in oxidizing conditions

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

Levinthal Paradox

- If the entire folding process was a random search, it would require too much time
- Initial stages of folding must be nearly random.
- Conformational changes occur on a time scale of 10-13 seconds.
- Proteins are known to fold on a timescale of seconds to minutes.
- Consider a 100 residue protein:
- if each residue has only 3 possible conformations (far less than reality)
3100 conformation x 10-13 seconds = 1027 years

- Even if a significant number of these conformations are sterically disallowed, the folding time would still be astronomical
- Energy barriers probably cause the protein to fold along a definite pathway

- if each residue has only 3 possible conformations (far less than reality)

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Minimization
- moves the Cartesian coordinates (X,Y,Z position) for each atom to obtain minimal energy
- result is dependent on the starting structure
- finds local not global minima
- typically, only small movements in atom position are made
- starting structure looks similar to ending structure
- large changes may occur for significantly distorted structures (stretch bonds)

ETOTAL = Echem + wexpEexp

Eexp = ENOE + Etorsion + EH-bond + Egyr + Erama + ERDC + ECSA + Epara

Echem = Ebond + Eangle + Edihedral + Evdw + Eelectr

Large bond change could invert chirality

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Minimization
- minimization will fail for severely distorted structures
- apoorly docked ligand onto a protein where bonds or atoms are overlapped
- In order to properly refine this poor structure, the minimization protocol would need to pull the Cd back through the ring which would require first going to a higher energy structure.
- This will not occur since the trend for minimization is to move towards a lower energy.
- The “minimized” structure will probably result with a stretched and distorted Cd-Cg bond as it moves the Cd away from the ring from the other direction
- the benzene ring and the remainder of the Leu side-chain will also be distorted in an effort to accommodate the overlapped structure

- minimization will fail for severely distorted structures

Highly unlikely that this structure would minimize since the Cd of the Leu side-chain penetrates the center of the benzene ring

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

Local versus Global Minimum problem

Structural landscape is filled with peaks and valleys.

Minimization protocol always moves “down hill”.

No means to “see” the overall structural landscape

No means to pass through higher intermediate structures to get to a lower minima.

The initial structure determines the results of the minimization!

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

Local versus Global Minimum problem

Another perspective of the Structural Landscape is a 3D funnel view that leads to the global minimum at the base of the funnel.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Minimization
- Process Overview

The molecular potential U depends on two types of variables:

Potential energy gradient g(Q), a vector with 3N components:

The necessary condition for a minimum is that the function gradient is zero:

Where xi denote atomic Cartesian coordinates and N is the number of atoms

or

The sufficient condition for a minimum is that the second derivative matrix is positive definite, i.e. for any 3N-dimensional vector u:

A simpler operational definition of this property is that all eigenvalues of F are positive at a minimum. The second derivative matrix is denoted by F in molecular mechanics and H in mathematics, and is defined as:

One measure of the distance from a stationary point is the rms gradient:

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Minimization
- Process Overview
- minima occurs when the first derivative is zero and when the second derivative is positive.

- U(Q) is a complicated function varying quickly with atomic coordinates Q
- molecular energy minimization is often performed in a series of steps
- the coordinates at step n+1 are determined from coordinates at previous step n
where dn is called a step.

- the initial step is a guess
- a systematic or random search is not practical (Levinthal Paradox)

- Steepest Descent Method
- search step (dn) is performed in the direction of fastest decrease of U,
opposite of the gradient g

where a is a factor determining the

length of the step.

- not efficient, but good for initial distorted
structures

- may be very slow near a solution

- search step (dn) is performed in the direction of fastest decrease of U,

- Process Overview

Always makes right angle

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Minimization
- Process Overview
- Conjugate Gradient (Powell)
- modify steepest descent to increase efficiency
- Initial steps are steepest descent

- current step vector is not similar to previous step vectors
- accumulates information about the energy function from one iteration to the next

- modify steepest descent to increase efficiency

One of two factors determines when a minimization calculations is completed:

- Number of defined steps (dn) have been calculated.
- a predefined value of the gradient (g) has been reached. (gradient very rarely actually reaches exactly zero)

Dependent on all previous steps

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Dynamics (MD)
- moves the Cartesian coordinates (X,Y,Z position) for each atom by integrating their equations of
- motion
- change in position with time gives velocity
- change in velocity with time (acceleration) gives force
- follow the laws of classical mechanics, most notably Newton's Second law:
- The force on atom i can be computed directly from the derivative of the potential energy
function (U) with respect to the coordinates ri, Fi = -dU/dri.

- to initiate MD we need to assign initial velocities
- This is done using a random number generator using the constraint of the Maxwell-
Boltzmann distribution.

where:

Hamiltonian H(G) where G represents the set of positions and momenta

Target Temperature (T)

Boltzman constant (kB)

- This is done using a random number generator using the constraint of the Maxwell-

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Dynamics (MD)
- The temperature is defined by the average kinetic energy of the system according to the kinetic theory of gases.
- internal energy of the system is U = 3/2 NkT
- kinetic energy is U = 1/2 Nmv2
where :

N is the number of atoms

v is the velocity

m is the mass

T is the temperature

k is the Boltzman constant

- By averaging over the velocities of all of the atoms in the system the temperature can
be estimated.

- Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution will be maintained throughout the
simulation.

- The temperature is defined by the average kinetic energy of the system according to the kinetic theory of gases.

- scale velocities: v = (3kT/m)1/2

- measure trajectories in small time steps, usually 1 femto-second (fs)
- typical duration of dynamics run is 10-100 pico-seconds (ps)

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

- Molecular Dynamics (MD)
- Force Fi exerted on atom i by the other atoms in the system is given by the negative gradient of the potential energy function (V) which in turn depends on the coordinates of all N atoms in the system

For small time steps (δt), the following approximated hold:

- Typically a time step of 1 to 10 fs is used for molecular systems.
- Thus a 100 ps (10-10 seconds) molecular dynamics simulation involves 105 to 104 integration
- steps.
- Even using the fastest computers only very rapid molecular processes can be simulated at an
- atomic level.

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

Typical Time Regions For Molecular Motion

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

XPLOR Script For Calculating An Extended Structure From PSF File

structure @PROTEIN.psf end {*Read structure file.*}

parameter @/PROGRAMS/xplor-nih-2.9.1/toppar/parallhdg_new.pro end

vector ident (X) ( all )

vector do (x=x/10.) ( all )

vector do (y=random(0.5) ) ( all )

vector do (z=random(0.5) ) ( all )

{*Friction coefficient, in 1/ps.*}

vector do (fbeta=50) (all) {*Heavy masses, in amus.*}

vector do (mass=100) (all)

parameter

nbonds

cutnb=5.5 rcon=20. nbxmod=-2 repel=0.9 wmin=0.1 tolerance=1.

rexp=2 irexp=2 inhibit=0.25

end

end

flags exclude * include bond angle vdw end

minimize powell nstep=50 nprint=10 end

flags include impr end

minimize powell nstep 50 nprint=10 end

dynamics verlet

nstep=50 timestep=0.001 iasvel=maxwell firsttemp= 300.

tcoupling = true tbath = 300. nprint=50 iprfrq=0

end

.

.

Read PSF and Parameter files

Mathematical manipulation of atom properties

Set parameters for non-bonded potential energy function

Define which potential energy functions to use

Execute set of Minimization and Dynamics

Introduction to Molecular Modeling Techniques

XPLOR Script For Calculating An Extended Structure From PSF File

.

.

parameter

nbonds

rcon=2. nbxmod=-3 repel=0.75

end

end

minimize powell nstep=100 nprint=25 end

dynamics verlet

nsteps=500 timestep=0.005 iasvel=maxwell firsttemp = 300.

tcoupling = true tbath = 300. nprint=100 iprfrq=0

end

flags exclude vdw elec end

vector do (mass=1.) ( name h* )

hbuild selection=( name h* ) phistep=360 end

flags include vdw elec end

minimize powell nstep=200 nprint=50 end

{*Write coordinates.*}

remarks extended strand (PROTEIN)

write coordinates output=PROTEIN.ext end

stop

Change non-bonding parameters

Another round of Minimization and Dynamics where hydrogens are added and to the structure and refined

Write out the structure and stop