1 / 9

OVERVEW OF THE WORK PLAN PREPARATION IN UGANDA

OVERVEW OF THE WORK PLAN PREPARATION IN UGANDA. By Philip M. Gwage. Structure of the Presentation. Background Familiarizing Key Stakeholders Selection of Consultant Preparation of Work Plan Visit by UCEE Workshop to Discuss Work Plan Observations. Background.

jacie
Download Presentation

OVERVEW OF THE WORK PLAN PREPARATION IN UGANDA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. OVERVEW OF THE WORK PLAN PREPARATION IN UGANDA By Philip M. Gwage

  2. Structure of the Presentation Background Familiarizing Key Stakeholders Selection of Consultant Preparation of Work Plan Visit by UCEE Workshop to Discuss Work Plan Observations

  3. Background • Uganda participated in both the UNEP and Susac CDM Studies (capacity building including institutional framework for implementing UNFCCC and CDM); • This project would build on previous efforts: • Development of technical capacity of key stakeholders; • Development of legal framework to establish implementing framework for both UNFCCC and CDM; and • Implementation of interim arrangements.

  4. Familiarizing of Key Stakeholders with the Project • UCCEE and EDRC visited Uganda about October 2002 to familiarize key stakeholders with the project and identify a national institution to develop work plan; • Several institutions (public, training and private) were visited; • The mission also called on the Minister of State for Environment; and • Institutions were responsive to the project idea.

  5. Identification of a National Institution • The mission visited the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Makerere University and talked to Adam Sebbit (some CDM skills); • The Mission visited Uganda Management Institute (project formulation skills); • The mission visited Uganda\Management Institute and discussed in detail the assignment and the need to bridge the CDM skills; and • Agreed to contract Uganda Management Institution with incorporation of Adam Sebbit as a consultant).

  6. Preparation of Work Plan • EDRC contracted to develop guidelines to support preparation of Work Plan • Uganda Management Institute developed Draft Work Plan; • EDRC expected to visit Uganda and assist Uganda Management Institute

  7. Second Visit by UCCEE • UCCEE visited Uganda to review the Draft Work Plan; • Review of the Draft Work Plan necessitated a detailed walk through the CDM project cycle and the Project; • UCCEE clarified that the project was providing an interim arrangement for implementing CDM in those participating countries which did not have national CDM Authority Offices; • However, the project was not supporting any previous proposed interim arrangements.

  8. .Workshop to Discuss Work Plan • The Department of Meteorology, in the Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment, organized the Workshop; • The project provided the funding; • Participants from public, private, NGOs and civil society were invited and participated in the workshop; • Participants showed a lot of interest and willingness to participate in implementation of CDM; • Many of the participants did not have previous knowledge of CDM.

  9. Views Expressed by Some People • At the Side Event in New Delhi some NGO expressed reservation of benefits of the project to participating countries because it was a top down design • Development of Work Plan and this Workshop should allay such fears through concrete inputs to the project design; • Prominent stakeholders expressed reservations to engaging of institutions who new less than Government institutions; • The Project sought some element of independence. This should be weigh against output; • Level of understanding of subject matter should be weighed in deciding duration of some workshops; and • The Draft Work Plan was not discussed in detailed thus the need to critically review the work plan particularly the project activities.

More Related