1 / 14

Autonomy and Artificiality

Autonomy and Artificiality. Margaret A. Boden Hojin Youn. 1. The Problem - and Why It Matters. H. Simon : “The Science of the Artificial” AI, Cybernetics A-Life : uses informational concepts and computer-modelling to study the functional principles of life in general (C. Langton, 1989)

ivyhall
Download Presentation

Autonomy and Artificiality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Autonomy and Artificiality Margaret A. Boden Hojin Youn

  2. 1. The Problem - and Why It Matters • H. Simon : “The Science of the Artificial” • AI, Cybernetics • A-Life : • uses informational concepts and computer-modelling to study the functional principles of life in general (C. Langton, 1989) • A-Life vs. AI • abstract study of life : abstract study of mind • the concept of autonomy, applies to A-Life.

  3. 1. The Problem - and Why It Matters • Human autonomy / freedom • Rollo May(1961) • dehumanizing dangers in modern science • refer to the mechanic implications of natural sciences(behaviourists psychology) • Skinner(1971) • Freedom, is an illusion. • Environmental pressures determine our behavior. • What ofartificial sciences?

  4. 1. The Problem - and Why It Matters • Contents • How A-Life addresses the phenomenon of autonomy • The concept of autonomy • Artificial sciences doesn’t deny, downgrade, our freedom

  5. 2. AI, A-Life, and Ants • Simon(1969) • much the same view with Skinner • rational thought and skilled behaviour are triggered by specific environmental cues • but allows internal, mentalistic cue • GPS • paid no attention to environmental factors • human thought purely in terms of internal mental/computational process

  6. 2. AI, A-Life, and Ants • Robotics driven by internalist view • guided top-down by internal planning and representation • not real-world, real-time creatures : their env. were simple, highly predictable ‘toy-worlds’ • noubelle AI • behaviour controlled by an interaction between • low-level mechanisms in the system • constansly changing details of the environment

  7. 2. AI, A-Life, and Ants • Robotics, situated • no need for the symbolic representations / detailed anticipatory planning • Traditional robotics: • brittleness caused by unexpected input • no way the problem environment can help • “Best source of information about the real world is the real world itself” • usually in hardware, but • Behavior apparently guided by goals and hierachical planning can occur(Maes 1991)

  8. 2. AI, A-Life, and Ants • Studying ‘emergent’ behaviors - GA and A-Life • GA • self-modifying programs, continually come up with new rules(structures) • use rule-changing algorithms modelled on genetic processes • Mutation : makes an change in a single rule • Crossover • Algorithms for identifying & selecting the successful rules • e.g.) Karl Sims(1991) • use GA to generate new images

  9. 2. AI, A-Life, and Ants • A-Life • use computer modelling to study processes that start with relatively simple, locally interacting units, and generate complex individual/group behaviors • Self-organization / Reproduction / Adaptation / Purposiveness / Evolution • Self-organization • flocking : Boids(a collection of very simple units) modelling • Possible for group-behavior to depend on very simple, local rules • Situated robotics / GA / A-Life share: • bottom-up, self-adaptive, parallel processing

  10. 2. AI, A-Life, and Ants • Evolutionary Robotics • simulation of insect-like robots • adapts to its specific task-environment • Links with biology • noubell AI : autonomous agents • A-life : autonomous systems

  11. 3. Autonomous Agency • Artificial insects: • specifically constructed to adapt to the particular environment • Autonomy 1. The extent to which response to the environment is direct or indirect • involves behavior mediated by inner mechanisms shaped by experience

  12. 3. Autonomous Agency 2. The extent to which the controlling mechanisms were self-generated rather than externally imposed • behavior which ‘emerges’ as a result of self-organizing process, not prefigured in the design of the creature • emergence-hierachies, evolve as a result of new forms of perception • intelligible vs. unintelligible emergence • (flocking : Sims’s program) • e.g.) different thoughts in consciousness

  13. 3. Autonomous Agency 3. The extent to which inner directing mechanisms can be reflected upon, and/or selectively modified in the light of general interests or the particularities of the current problem in its environmental contexts • conscious deliberation : the crux of human autonomy • conscious thought requires a sequential ‘machine’ more like a von Neumann computer • Creativity: an aspect of human autonomy • Autonomy and Unpredictablity • AI systems, not necessarily deterministic • Determinism  Predictability

  14. 4. Conclusion • The science of artificial can model autonomy of various kinds • highlights autonomy - as a characteristic of living things • A-Life can teach us how increasing complexity arises from self-organization on successive levels, and how a creature can negotiate its environment by constant interaction with it. • But, the kind of autonomy, free choice, is better illuminated by the classical AI. • AI does not reduce our respect for human minds. • Helps us to understand how it is possible

More Related