1 / 23

Defining the Fusarium /host interaction through genomics and proteomics

Defining the Fusarium /host interaction through genomics and proteomics. Fusarium graminearum Broad host fungal pathogen causing fusarium head blight in wheat, barley, and oats and gibberella ear rot in maize. Reduced grain yield and quality. Mycotoxin deposition.

Download Presentation

Defining the Fusarium /host interaction through genomics and proteomics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Defining the Fusarium/host interaction through genomics and proteomics

  2. Fusarium graminearum Broad host fungal pathogen causing fusarium head blight in wheat, barley, and oats and gibberella ear rot in maize. • Reduced grain yield and quality. • Mycotoxin deposition. (Deoxynivalenol-DON) • food and feed safety issues • potential export barrier

  3. Trichothecene mycotoxin 322 Da Different forms affect cytoxicity 15-Acetyl DON 3-Acetyl DON Important in pathogen virulence DEOXYNIVALENOL (DON)

  4. Cellular Effects of DON • Inhibits protein synthesis • Binds to ribosomal protein L3 (RPL3) • Blocks peptidyl transferase?

  5. Objective: • Find genes, whose altered expression in plants, will increase resistance to Fusarium graminearum

  6. Saccharomyces cerevisiae • Single cellular fungi • Haploid or diploid • 5 um diameter • Eukaryote

  7. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Model System • 1997 – first eukaryotic organism sequenced • 6200 ORF’s • Saccharomyces Genome Database • http://www.yeastgenome.org • Inexpensive / easy to use • Conservation of biochemical processes

  8. Yeast Genomic Screening on DON Collection in 96 well format Pin (2X) 1536 / plate Singer Robot YPD + TI + 125 ug/mL DON Grow 30°C, 2-6 days Photograph and quantify growth Repeat 2 times

  9. DMSO TI TI + DON Screening Results – Example ATG4

  10. DMSO TI TI + DON Screening Results – Example RPL27A

  11. Screening Results – Top Strains

  12. DMSO TI TI + DON 68h 5d WT ARC35 AYT1 ATG4 RPL27A RPL39 Serial Dilution Dot Assay Results (Growth on TI + 175 ug/mL DON)

  13. CONCLUSIONS • Potential mycotoxin target genes discovered: • Expected – eg. RPL39, RPL27A, AYT1 • Novel – eg. ARC35, ATG4, • Screening method flags both “hits” and “suppressors”: • Hits - deleted genes give DON hypersensitivity • Suppressors – deleted genes suppress DON cytotoxicity

  14. FUTURE WORK • Screen yeast knock-out collections on other Fusarium mycotoxins • Select genes for altered expression in plants

  15. Fusarium systems biology pipeline

  16. Identification of genes involved in mycotoxin synthesis • Tri1 (unlinked to trichothecene gene cluster)1 • Butenolide gene cluster – fg08079 encodes a P450 required for butenolide synthesis.2 • Clm1 – encoding an enzyme required for culmorin synthesis.3 1 McCormick et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2004). 2 Harris et al. Fungal Genet. Biol. (2007). 3 McCormick et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. (2010).

  17. Wheat Maize (68 unique) 6979 2311 2389 2164 4597 2166 4602 Barley (2 unique) Fg genes detected by 96hai Fusarium transcriptomics • Whole gene set expression profiling conducted using Agilent 4X44K array platform - up to three 60mers representing each predicted F. graminearum gene. • monitoring impact of Fusarium regulatory genes. • monitoring in planta expression – wheat, barley, maize.

  18. Fusarium proteomics • Using non-gel-based quantitative proteomics technology (iTRAQ), we monitored 435 Fusarium proteins ID over a time course during which mycotoxin synthesis was induced in vitro1. • The quantitative data of 130 proteins were ID as statistically significant (ANOVA, p<0.05). Many of these proteins are potentially involved in pathogenicity. 1Taylor et al. Proteomics (2008).

  19. Defining resistance in maize • Gene expression profiling (55K oligomer arrays) and quantitative protein profiling (iTRAQ): - B73 (susceptible) - CO441 (silk & kernel resistance; Reid et al., 2003). • Construction of recombinant inbred line by single seed descent: F6 seed of (B73 X CO441) - 414 lines. - Summer 2010 – begin phenotyping silk and kernel resistance. B73 CO441

  20. Arabidopsis is susceptible to F. graminearum Uninoculated Inoculated

  21. DMSO Chemical compounds DMSO A B C

More Related