International criminal court
Download
1 / 13

International Criminal Court - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 258 Views
  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: Travel / Places

International Criminal Court. Presentation by: Brigette Henk. The ICC: How it Came About:. As early as the late 19 th century, there were discussions about the need for a permanent international tribunal These arguments grew louder after WWI, in the case of the German Kaiser

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentationdownload

International Criminal Court

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


International criminal court l.jpg

International Criminal Court

Presentation by: Brigette Henk


The icc how it came about l.jpg

The ICC: How it Came About:

  • As early as the late 19th century, there were discussions about the need for a permanent international tribunal

  • These arguments grew louder after WWI, in the case of the German Kaiser

    • Nothing happened because nobody could agree on the type of jurisidiction

  • WWII precursors included the Four Power Agreement and the Nuremburg Trial

  • Post-war, early 50’s, there was still not enough support for permanence

  • Early 90s Rwandan/Yugoslavian Tribunal trials paved way for the ICC


The icc it s purpose l.jpg

The ICC: It’s purpose

  • The ICC is a “court of last resort”

  • To prosecute severe violations of international law

    • Crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide

  • Makes up for the deliberate/unintentional failure of national law

    • Takes cases in which national courts are “unable or unwilling” to dutifully process a case

  • Deals with cases arising after July 1, 2002

    • It’s power is NOT retro-active


It s jurisdiction is valid when l.jpg

It’s jurisdiction is valid when…

  • There is Genocide, War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity

  • The accused is a member of a state party

  • The crime took place in the territory of the accused

  • The national courts are unwilling/able to try the crime

  • Referred by the United Nations Security Council


The structure of the icc l.jpg

The Structure of the ICC

  • Based in the Hague, Netherlands

    • Cases can be tried anywhere

  • Four Organs of the Court

    • Presidency (three judges, elected amongst the 18)

      • Current trio: Korea, Mali and Germany

    • Judicial divisions (18 judges from around the world)

      • Pre-trial, Trial, Appeals

    • Office of the Prosecutor

      • Takes referrals, conducts research and leads the prosecution

    • Registry

      • The administrative services sector


The eu and the icc l.jpg

The EU and the ICC

  • During initial proposals the EU was not united

    • Great Britain/France were not immediately supported

    • Germany, Spain, Netherlands, others expressed early support

    • The Rome Statute acted as a compromise between MS

      • Individual policy positions influenced some EU MS to change

  • When the ICC was signed the EU became unified

    • However, the process of agreement does not reflect CFSP

    • Its subsequent support is an example of CFSP

      • They have become “active” in the promotion of the ICC, as the EU

  • ICC reflects major importance of major EU tenets

    • Rule of law, human rights, basic liberties


The icc source of conflict l.jpg

The ICC: Source of Conflict

  • Many countries feared a loss of sovereignty

  • African countries feared that the ICC was an excuse to jail their leaders

  • Fear loss of immunity of their leaders

  • Fear of politically motivated prosecutions


Ratifiers of the rome statute l.jpg

Ratifiers of the Rome Statute

108 Countries have signed AND ratified Rome Statute


Signatories of the rome statute l.jpg

Signatories of the Rome Statute

  • 40 Countries have signed but NOT ratified

  • In Europe: Armenia, Czech Republic, Moldova, Monaco, Russia and Ukraine

  • In Africa: Algeria, Angola, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, Eritrea, Guinea-Bissau, Morocco, Mozambique, São Tomé and Príncipe, Seychelles, Sudan and Zimbabwe.

  • In the Americas: Bahamas, Chile, Haiti, Jamaica, Saint Lucia and the United States.

  • In Asia: Bahrain, Bangladesh, Iran, Israel, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Oman, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Syria, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and Yemen.

    • (list supplied from Wikipedia)

  • These forty countries are legally prevented from getting in the way of the treaty

  • States that did not sign by Dec 31, 2000 must “accede to the treaty”

    • Eight have thus far, others are in the process


  • Those who refuse to sign or ratify l.jpg

    Those who refuse to sign or ratify

    • Iraq (reversed a decision to sign, citing pressure from the US)

    • Lebanon (citing “intense pressure” from the US)

    • Turkey (reversed a decision, despite pressure from EU)

    • China (believes it interferes with sovereignty and national law)

    • Israel (signed but refuses to ratify, clearly accomplice of US)

    • India ( worries about its internal conflicts, and interference with national court system)

    • Pakistan (worries about lack of immunity for heads of state)


    Eu vs us l.jpg

    EU vs US

    • The US led the establishment of the ICTY and ICTR

      • Evidently prefers use of IC on a case-by-case basis

    • US was very worried about the ICC’s ability to try Americans

      • They were not willing to let their citizens/leaders be tried

      • They prohibited their military/other groups from helping ICC

      • December 31, 2000 Bill Clinton signed the treaty

    • In 2002 the US “unsigned” the ICC treaty, firmly indicating its opposition


    Current investigations and open cases l.jpg

    Current investigations and open cases

    • Northern Uganda (Crimes against Humanity, War Crimes)

      • In pre-trial motion, four arrest warrants are valid

    • The Democratic Republic of Congo (three open cases)

      • Thomas Lubanga, rebel leader, arrested locally and transferred to ICC custody

      • He was arrested for War Crimes (child soldiers), in 2006

      • His trial, the first by the ICC, began in January 2009

    • The Central African Republic

      • One case in Pre-Trial (Crimes against Humanity, War Crimes)

    • Darfur (Crimes against Humanity, War Crimes)

      • (Sudan has signed the Rome treaty, but not ratified it)

      • Three open cases, all in Pre-trial motion

      • Referral by UNSC


    References l.jpg

    References

    • Deliberating CFSP: European Foreign Policy and the International Criminal Court (Nicole Deitelhoff)

    • http://www.icc-cpi.int

    • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c4/ICCmemberstatesworldmap102007.png

    • interkulti.eu/Junglelaw/images/stories/17.jpg


    ad
  • Login