Slide1 l.jpg
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 21

Lecture Outline Components of Language Development Theoretical Perspectives on Language Development Nativist Evidence and Criticisms Interactionist PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 319 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Lecture Outline Components of Language Development Theoretical Perspectives on Language Development Nativist Evidence and Criticisms Interactionist Evidence and Criticisms. Components of Language Development Phonological Development

Download Presentation

Lecture Outline Components of Language Development Theoretical Perspectives on Language Development Nativist Evidence and Criticisms Interactionist

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Lecture Outline

  • Components of Language Development

  • Theoretical Perspectives on Language Development

    • Nativist

      • Evidence and Criticisms

    • Interactionist

      • Evidence and Criticisms


Components of Language Development

  • Phonological Development

    • Acquisition of knowledge about the sound system of a language

      • Phonemes: The smallest sound units that distinguish meaning

        • Ex: rake and lake differ by one phoneme (/r/ versus /l/)


  • Syntactic Development

    • The learning of the syntax (grammar) of a language

      • Syntax: Rules in a language that specify how words from different categories (nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.) can be combined


  • Semantic Development

    • Learning the system for expressing meaning in a language, including word learning


  • Pragmatic Development

    • Acquiring knowledge about how language is used (cultural rules)


Nativist Perspectives on Language Development

  • Universal Grammar: A set of highly abstract, unconscious rules that are common to all languages (Noam Chomsky)

    • Unique to humans


Evidence Consistent with Nativist Perspectives:

  • Children master language with little explicit training

    • Non-human primates require extensive training to master the most basic language skills

    • Although some non-human primates may combine symbols, they do not show evidence of using syntax

  • Indicates that only humans can acquire language and also suggests that innate factors are involved in language development


Evidence (con’t):

  • Certain areas of the brain appear to be specialized for language

    • Left hemisphere of cerebral cortex

      • Hemispheric specialization is present in infancy—suggests that innate factors are involved in language development


Evidence (con’t):

  • Appears to be a “critical” period for language acquisition:

    • Critical period: Time during which language develops readily and after which language acquisition is much more difficult and less successful

      • Suggests that innate factors are involved in language development


  • Evidence for “critical period”:

    • Brain damage is more likely to result in permanent language impairment if it occurs in adulthood than if it occurs in childhood


  • Less hemispheric specialization occurs when a second language is learned at 4 years or older than if it is learned earlier


  • Knowledge of grammar is related to the age at which individuals begin learning a second language, not the length of their exposure to the language

    • Individuals exposed earlier show greater knowledge as adults


Evidence Consistent with Nativist Perspectives

(con’t):

  • Congenitally deaf children whose parents are not proficient in sign language:

    • Develop larger vocabularies (gestures) than their parents

    • Spontaneously impose syntax (grammatical structure) when signing

  • Suggests that innate factors are involved in language development


Criticisms of Nativist Perspectives:

  • Universal grammar common to all languages has not been identified

  • Focus on syntactic development and neglect other aspects of language development

  • Ignore role of social environment in language development


Interactionist Perspectives on Language Development

  • Language development is strongly influenced by children’s motivation to communicate with others

  • Because of this motivation, they pay attention to “clues” in language and the social context in which language is used

    • Allows them to master language


Evidence Consistent with Interactionist Perspectives:

  • Children show sensitivity to a variety of “clues” in language and the social context in which language is used


  • Fast Mapping:

    • Process of rapidly learning a new word when a familiar and unfamiliar word are contrasted

      • Ex: “chromium” and “red”


  • Linguistic Context

    • Grammatical form of a novel word influences children’s interpretation of it

      • Ex: “sibbing” vs. “a sib” vs. “some sib”


  • Syntactic Bootstrapping

    • Inferring the meaning of a word based on the grammatical structure of the sentence in which it is used

      • Ex: “The duck is kradding the rabbit”

        OR

        “The duck and rabbit are kradding”


  • Pragmatic Cues

    • Aspects of the social context that are used to infer the meaning of words

      • Children use direction of gaze or other gestures to learn word meanings

        • Will assign a new word to the object that an adult is looking at when saying the word (even if the child cannot see the target object)

      • Intentionality/Emotional Reactions of the speaker

        • Ex: “Let’s find the gazzer!”


Criticisms of Interactionist Theories

  • Language is too complex to be learned only by paying attention to “clues” available in language and the social context in which it is used

    • The evidence of children’s sensitivity to “clues” involves mainly semantic development, not syntactic development


  • Login