1 / 25

Hvordan sikre tilgjengeligheten av vitenskapelig litteratur?

Hvordan sikre tilgjengeligheten av vitenskapelig litteratur?. Ludvig M. Sollid. VITENSKAPELIG PUBLISERING - SÆREGENHETER (I).

ivana
Download Presentation

Hvordan sikre tilgjengeligheten av vitenskapelig litteratur?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hvordan sikre tilgjengeligheten av vitenskapelig litteratur? Ludvig M. Sollid

  2. VITENSKAPELIG PUBLISERING -SÆREGENHETER (I) ”Unlike the authors of books and magazine articles, who write for royalty or fees, the authors of refereed journal articles write only for 'research impact'. To be cited and built on in the research of others, their findings have to be accessible to their potential users.” Harnard, S: Nature, 410, 1024-1025, 2001

  3. VITENSKAPELIG PUBLISERING -SÆREGENHETER (II) Jeg må bare få tak i den artikkelen! Forskere på jakt etter litteratur blir fort desperate

  4. VITENSKAPELIG PUBLISERING - KOSTBAR VIRKSOMHET ~ 20 000 referee baserte tidsskrifter > 2 million publiserte artikler (referee-vurderte) Total kollektiv betaling (fra alle verdens institusjoner) per artikkel: ~ $ 2000 Harnard, S: Nature, 410, 1024-1025, 2001

  5. VITENSKAPELIG PUBLISERING KAN VÆRE GOD BUTIKK REED ELSEVIER - år 2000 OMSETNING: £693m PROFITT: £252m (36%) Kilde: The Guardian, 26 May 2001

  6. Monograph and Serial Costs in North American Research Libraries 1986-2001 http://www.arl.org/stats/

  7. NORGE ER EN DEL AV VERDEN UiO 1997-1999: Prisstigning tidsskrifter medisin og naturvitenskap: 43% - 45% Reduksjon av abonnementer: Medisin: 23,5% Naturvitenskap: 50% Biblioteksdirektøren, Universitetsbiblioteket i Oslo

  8. VITENSKAPELIG PUBLISERING -AKTØRER Science, Technology and Medicine (STM): • Faglige medlemsgrupper (div. medlemsforeninger, societies) • Universitetsforlag etc (”non-for-profit publishers”) • Kommersielle forlag (”for-profit publishers”)

  9. Biochemical Journal Publisher: Biochemical Society (not-for-profit body) Subscription: 1991 £793 Subscription 2001 £1,334 Increase 68% Brain Research Publisher: Elsevier Subscription: 1991 £3,713 Subscription: 2001 £9,148 Increase: 146% Journal of Virological Methods Publisher: Elsevier Subscription: 1991 £527 Subscription: 2001 £1,555 Increase: 195% Prev. Veterinary Medicine Publisher: Elsevier Subscription: 1991 £171 Subscription: 2001 £713 Increase: 317% • Kilder: • The Guardian • Consortium of University Research Libraries (UK)

  10. ADVOCACY GROUP Michael Ashburner, University of Cambridge Patrick O. Brown, Stanford University Michael B. Eisen, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and UC Berkeley Marc Kirschner, Harvard University Chaitan Khosla, Stanford University Roel Nusse, Stanford University Richard J. Roberts, New England Biolabs Matthew Scott, Stanford University Harold Varmus, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Barbara Wold, Caltech

  11. We support the establishment of an online public library that would provide the full contents of the published record of research and scholarly discourse in medicine and the life sciences in a freely accessible, fully searchable, interlinked form. To encourage the publishers of our journals to support this endeavor, we pledge that, beginning in September, 2001, we will publish in, edit or review for, and personally subscribe to, only those scholarly and scientific journals that have agreed to grant unrestricted free distribution rights to any and all original research reports that they have published, through PubMed Central and similar online public resources, within 6 months of their initial publication date.

  12. Scientific American, 23 April 2001

  13. BESØKSPROFIL TIL ELEKTRONISKE TIDSSKRIFTER Gjennomsnittlig antall ganger per måned hver artikkel i fulltekst fra EMBO Journal er blitt besøkt (publikasjonsperiode: juli-desember 1999). Richardson M: Nature Debates, 2001

  14. Åpent støttebrev - per 15. november 2001: - 28673 har signert - fra 173 land -146 signaturer fra Norge

  15. Future e-access to the primary literature http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access > 50 diskusjonsinnlegg - les disse!

  16. MOTSTAND MOT PLS - OGSÅ FRA ”non-for-profit PUBLISHERS” (I) As publishers, scientific societies are responsible for the peer review of articles, production and distribution of content, and historic archiving of their journals. Expenses associated with these efforts are recovered from various sources including subscriptions. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) supports the right of its member societies to independently establish policies and practices for online access that will assure the viability of their publications. FASEB news May 11, 2001

  17. MOTSTAND MOT PLS - OGSÅ FRA ”non-for-profit PUBLISHERS” (II) ”The PLS group not only wants free content. It unfortunately also wants journals to allow their content to be posted by any web server wishing to post it. We consider this demand to be poorly thought-out, unnecessary, a waste of money and a potentially dangerous threat to scientific exchange forums.” Position statement by the American Soc for Biochem and Molecular Biol Response to PubMed Central and the Public Library of Science Boycott Robert D. Wells, Ph.D President, ASBMB Herbert Tabor, M.D. Editor, J. Biol. Chem.

  18. KAN DAGENS PUBLISERINGSSYSTEM BLI ØEDLAGT AV PLS SITT INITATIV? Michael Keller, Publisher, HighWire Press: …. Those who would stand to gain would be the large commercial publishers who compete with them for authors and readers, and who have deeper pockets. As the publications of scholarly societies declined, the dependency of universities on publications of those for-profit publishers that are 'irresponsible' would increase. Nature Debates, 2001

  19. Public Library of Science Journals ...The costs of peer review, editorial oversight and publication will be recovered primarily by charges to authors, which we expect to be approximately $300 per published article.

  20. PUBMED CENTRAL DESENTRALISERER PUBMED CENTRAL: Drives av National Center for Biotechnology Information som en del av National Library of Medicine (NLM)  Biomedisinsk litteraturarkiv, fritt tilgjengelig for alle.  Krav: Fulltekst artikler skal være tilgjengelig hos PubMed Central Fra april 2001 er dette opphevet.  Nå: Tilgang til fulltekst artikkel kan skje via lenke til forleggers Web-side. Edwin Sequeira, Johanna McEntyre, David Lipman; Nature Debates, 2001

  21. ARKIVER FOR ØKENDE ANTALL TIDSSKRIFTER TILGJENGELIG Genome Biology 59 online journals published by BioMed Central Proc Natl Acad Sci (6 month delay) British Medical Journal (no delay) Bull Medical Library Association (no delay) Critical Care (no delay) Breast Cancer Research (no delay) Arthritis Research (no delay) Molecular Biology of the Cell (2 month delay) J Am Med Inform Assoc (6 month delay) Can Med Assoc Journal (6 month delay) The Plant Cell (1 year delay) Plant Physiology (1 year delay) Journal of Medical Entomology (1 year delay) Respiratory Research (no delay) Curr Contr Trials in Cardiovasc Med (no delay) Cell Stress and Chaperones (6 month delay) Antimicrobial Agents and Chemother (6 months delay) Appl Environ Microbiol (6 months delay) Clin Diag Lab Immunol (6 months delay) Infection and Immunity (6 months delay) Journal of Bacteriology (6 months delay) Journal of Clinical Microbiology (6 months delay) Journal of Virology (6 months delay) Molecular and Cellular Biology (6 months delay) Nucleic Acids Research (6 month delay) EMBO Journal (1 year delay) Clinical Microbiology Reviews (1 year delay) Microbiol Mol Biol Rev (1 year delay) Biochemical Journal (delay interval unknown) Cold Spring Harbor Press Journals (unknown) Genetics (delay interval unknown) Am J Hum Gen (delay interval unknown) Many journals currently provide recent contents for free following a delay after publication, but only through their own Web sites: HighWire Press journals.

  22. ELEKTRONISK PUBLISERING OG ARKIVERING I FRAMTIDA - HVOR GÅR VI? - Forsvinner papirutgavene helt? - Arkivering av artikler - samordnes dette med andre databaser? - Forsvinner referee-ordningen? - Vil forfatterne/universitetene selv stå for publisering/distribusjon?

  23. ELEKTRONISK SØKING - METADATA HTML spesifiserer ikke informasjonen: <H1>The future of the electronic scientific literature</H1><H3>by John Smith</H3> XML spesifiserer informasjonen på en måte som datamaskinene forstår: <articletitle>The future of the electronic scientific literature< /articletitle> <author><firstname>John</firstname> <lastname>Smith</lastname></author> Kilde: Nature Debates, 2001

  24. ELEKTRONISK SØKING - METADATA Open Archives Initiative (OAI) http://www.openarchives.org/ Standard for metadata merking Selv-archiving initiative http://www.eprints.org/ Tilbyr gratis programvare for institusjoner å lage OAI-kompatible arkiver  publisering på nettet kan gjøres av forfatterne selv

More Related