1 / 29

Robert Mills Gagn é (1916- 2002)

Robert Mills Gagn é (1916- 2002). Scholar Teacher Mentor. Career Highlights. High School in North Andover, MA 1937: A.B. in psychology, Yale University 1940: Ph.D. in psychology, Brown University 1940: Faculty, Connecticut College for Women

ivan
Download Presentation

Robert Mills Gagn é (1916- 2002)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Robert Mills Gagné (1916- 2002) • Scholar • Teacher • Mentor

  2. Career Highlights • High School in North Andover, MA • 1937: A.B. in psychology, Yale University • 1940: Ph.D. in psychology, Brown University • 1940: Faculty, Connecticut College for Women • 1941 – 45: U.S. Army – research in aviation psychology, perceptual abilities, and human engineering • 1945 – 49: Penn State and Connecticut College – research in transfer of training in multi-discrimination motor tasks

  3. Career Highlights • 1949 – 1958: U.S. Air Force – director of research related to military training • 1958 – 1962: Professor, Princeton University – developed theory of learning hierarchies • 1958 – 1961: Consultant to U.S. Dept. of Defense • 1962 – 1965: Director of Research, American Institutes for Research • 1964 – 1966: Consultant to U.S. Dept. of Education • 1966 – 1969: Professor, U.C. Berkeley • 1969 – 1986: Florida State University

  4. Major Contributions: Theory • Created a unified theory of instruction * • Studied learning in real life situations • Bridged the paradigm shift between behavioral and cognitive learning psychology * • Influenced a generation of research and theory-building (e.g., David Merrill, Charlie Reigeluth) • Published 148 works (at least)

  5. Major Contributions: Practice • Profoundly influenced instructional design for K-12 education, military, and business/industry • Led major curriculum development projects • AAAS: Science – A Process Approach • University of MD: Mathematics Project • Founded and designed the instructional systems graduate program at Florida State University • Engineered the ISD Model (Systems Approach) *

  6. Instructional Design Models Five “Families”: Behavioral Cognitive (Information Processing) Cognitive (Discovery) Humanistic Social

  7. Behavioral Models • Reinforce it!

  8. Behavioral Models • Attend only to behavior (observable) • Specify behavior to be learned • Analyze final behavior into smaller components • Provide repeated practice and feedback • Use shaping techniques as needed • Provide reinforcement for correct responses

  9. Cognitive Models(Information Processing) • Pour it in!

  10. Cognitive Models(Information Processing) • Attend to internal learning processes as well as behavior • Compare learning to computer information processing (e.g., storage, retrieval) • Provide external support for each stage of internal processing: attention, expectancy, recall of related content, organization of content, storage, practice and feedback, retrieval, retention, transfer

  11. ISD Features • Training is geared to specific needs. • Learning outcomes are specifiedin advance. • Solution is engineered, using research-based principles of learning and instruction. • Learning outcomes are measured. • Revisions are based on data.

  12. ISD “ADDIE” Steps and Outputs (Medsker Version) Analyze Design Develop Implement Evaluate • Performance Requirements • Training Requirements • Learning Maps • Objectives • Exercises & Tests • Strategies • Media Choices • Design Document • Draft Courseware • Formative Evaluation Results • Revised Courseware • Trained People • Training Results • Performance Results

  13. Who Uses ISD? • U.S. Military Services • U.S. Federal Agencies • Large Businesses • Training and Consulting Firms

  14. Systematically Designed Instruction • Valid Meets a real need • Reliably Effective Consistently achieves objectives • Efficient Minimizes training time and cost • Documented Facilitates maintenance

  15. Gagné’s Theory of Instruction • Learning outcomes may be classified by types or domains, which cross subject matter disciplines. • Learning outcomes may be analyzed into component and prerequisite skills, which may be “mapped” to define optimal learning sequences. • Every complete act of learning involves predictable internal processes that may be supported by specific external instructional events. • Different learning outcomes require different conditions.

  16. Gagné’s Taxonomy: Verbal Information • Knowing “what” or “that” • Being able to recite, state, tell, describe, or explain • Learning for recall • Challenge is aiding retention A.K.A. “Declarative Knowledge”

  17. Gagné’s Taxonomy: Intellectual Skills • Knowing “how” • Being able to classify, diagnose, solve, design, create… • Learning for transfer • Challenge is enhancing transfer A.K.A. “Procedural Knowledge”

  18. Gagné’s Taxonomy: Attitudes • Personal action choices based on beliefs, feelings, values • Choosing a course of action • Three parts: belief, feeling, tendency to act • Challenge is changing an established attitude

  19. Gagné’s Taxonomy: Motor Skills • Performing a physical activity with smoothness and timing • Combines mental routines and physical skills • Challenge is improving accuracy, consistency, and/or speed

  20. Gagné’s Taxonomy: Cognitive Strategies • Managing one’s own thinking and learning • May be simple or complex • Often used in combination with other types of learning • Challenge is how to build and transfer A.K.A. “Strategic Knowledge”

  21. Theory of Instruction • Learning outcomes may be classified by types or domains, which cross subject matter disciplines. • Learning outcomes may be analyzed into component and prerequisite skills, which may be “mapped” to define optimal learning sequences. • Every complete act of learning involves predictable internal processes that may be supported by specific external instructional events. • Different learning outcomes require different conditions.

  22. Instructional Analysis • Breakdown of a Task into its Learned Components Procedural Hierarchical Do  Analyze Teach  Teach Analyze Design Develop Implement Evaluate

  23. Instructional Analysis • Breakdown of a Task into its Learned Components Combination Procedural Hierarchical Analyze Design Develop Implement Evaluate

  24. Intellectual Skills Learning Hierarchy Higher-OrderRule “Generate” Solution Rule Rule “Demonstrate”Application of Rules Concept Concept “Classify” Concept

  25. Instructional Analysis Benefits • Complete Instruction • Lean, Efficient Instruction • Sequencing Guide • Formative Evaluation Guide

  26. Theory of Instruction • Learning outcomes may be classified by types or domains, which cross subject matter disciplines. • Learning outcomes may be analyzed into component and prerequisite skills, which may be “mapped” to define optimal learning sequences. • Every complete act of learning involves predictable internal processes that may be supported by specific external instructional events. • Different learning outcomes require different conditions.

  27. Lesson Design

  28. Handcuffing Video The Nine Events of Instruction Click the video screen to start the movie.

  29. Theory of Instruction • Learning outcomes may be classified by types or domains, which cross subject matter disciplines. • Learning outcomes may be analyzed into component and prerequisite skills, which may be “mapped” to define optimal learning sequences. • Every complete act of learning involves predictable internal processes that may be supported by specific external instructional events. • Different learning outcomes require different conditions.

More Related