Skip this Video
Download Presentation
8. Diagnostic Radiology

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 35

X-Ray Diagnositcs and Imaging - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

8. Diagnostic Radiology. 8.2 X-RAY DIAGNOSTICS AND IMAGING. Fluoroscope.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'X-Ray Diagnositcs and Imaging' - issac

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

8. Diagnostic Radiology




Many different types image receptors are used in modern diagnostic radiology. They all have in common that they form an image by absorption of energy from the X-ray beam (after transmitting through the body). The main characteristics will be discussed on the example of the direct exposure film.

Direct-Exposure Film

Direct exposure film has a relatively low absorption efficiency for photons in the diagnostic range, however it is still used in many combinations of image receptor systems.

Direct exposure film material has special design of two photographic emulsions with protective layers between to optimize the absorption efficiency  .

Correct exposure is important to produce a reliable image on the film. Over- or underexposure will result in loss of contrast and therefore possibly in loss of diagnostic information.


The proper film exposure can be obtained from the so-called characteristic curveof the film material.

The blackening of the film after X-ray exposure is expressed in terms of its optical density:

D = log10(I0/I)

where I0 and Iis the light intensities before and after passing through

the exposed film material.


The objective of this section is to correlate the optical density D(amount of blackening) with the received X-ray, exposure. This can be obtained with a simple model for the absorption process.

A single emulsion of film material initially contains Gsilver-bromine grains per unit area, the average cross section of the grain is b.After irradiation with a flux of NX-ray photons per unit area a total number of ggrains per area are sensitized.

The number of sensitized grains per incoming X-ray photon is:

with X as the received X-ray dose and ka conversion constant.








The sensitized grains develop into a silver speck with an average cross section a after the film development. If light hits one of the silver specks in the developed film, it is completely absorbed (black spot).


To relate the number of sensitized grains to the optical density D the absorption of the light in the film material of thickness t can be described as:

Using this relation the optical density can be calculated to:

This relation is known as Nuttings Law !

Maximum optical density for an area on the film is obtained when all grains are sensitized: g = G


The correlation between the optical density D and the maximum number of sensitized grains results in a relation between the optical density D and the received dose X :

This is displayed in the figure.

The curve relating the optical density to the film exposure dose is called the characteristic curveof the film material.

In the center part of the curve the relation between optical density and the logarithm of the dose is approximately linear:


For a small contrast in dose DX= X1-X2the associated change in optical density is:

The constant F is known as the film-gamma and ranges between 2-3. It corresponds directly to the slope of the linear section of the characteristic curve.

For low exposure or high exposure the characteristic curve levels out, exposure differences do not translate into differences in optical density (blackening).


A film with an optical density of D  0.5 appears overall light, a film with optical density D  2 appears overall black.

To achieve best contrast the film must be exposed hi such a way that the region of interest in the patient cause film doses which are in the center part of the characteristic curve.


Additionally the contrast can be affected by the energy absorption efficiency of the image receptor material which in general decreases with energy.

Efficiency and / or sensitivity of film material

The sensitivity of film material depends on size and density of grains, emulsion thickness and X-ray absorption efficiency.


The figure shows a typical X-ray absorption efficiency efor a double emulsion film as a function of energy.

The efficiency drops rather rapidly with increasing energy and is mainly determined by the interaction probability of the photons with the film material (attenuation coefficient m ) and the thickness of the material t.

An important goal is to maximize the efficiency of the image receptor material.


The noise in the image may limit the contrast.

The noise in the receptor image arises from several sources:

fluctuations in the number of absorbed X-ray photons per unit area

fluctuations in the absorbed photon energy

fluctuations in the number of silver halide per unit area of emulsion

The first and the last are the main sources for noise (quantum mottle and random darkening).


To calculate the effect of quantum mottle we replace:

with A as area, e as interaction efficiency, and N as number of incident photons.

The resulting expression for the noise in the optical density of the image is:

The noise due to quantum mottle is proportional to the slope G of the characteristic curve of the receptor material!


To determine the noise due to random darkeningthe influence of granularity fluctuation (g  A)1/2 in the number of developed grains (g  A)in area A for the fluctuation in optical density DDG needs to be calculated:

after substituting for g.

Fluctuations therefore depend directly on fluctuations in grain size!


The figure shows that the quantum mottle corresponds directly to the film-gamma and the random darkening due to the granularity distribution directly to the characteristic curve.


Alternative Image Receptors

Intensifying Screens in front of the photo emulsion convert X-rays into visible light. The film material is more sensitive to light photons than to X-ray photons. This increases the energy absorp­tion efficiency e by more than one order of magnitude, but the resolution decreases due to additional noise components.


Image intensifiers convert X-ray photons to electrons by photo­electric effect on a photocathode. The electrons are focused onto by electrical fields on a fluorescent screen where they form an in­tensified image which can be recorded on film or viewed with a TV camera.


Xeroradiography is a dry non-silver photographic system, which produces images on paper (Xerox copies). It is slower than standard film receptors (which may result in higher doses) but has better resolution and better energy absorption efficiency e


lonography replaces the photographic film by a position sensitive ion chamber. The X-rays induce by ionization of the gas electron clouds which can be detected by an electrode with good spatial resolution.


X-Ray Transmission Computed Tomography

Several problems exist with conventional radiography techniques:

inability to distinguish soft body tissue because of limited contrast(see example blood-muscle); this can be fixed by the use of liquidcontrast medium which has to be injected.

inability to resolve spatially structures along the X-ray propagationaxis resulting in loss of depth information (flat picture), becausethe three-dimensional body is projected on to a two-dimensionalreceptor.


Computed tomography (CT) techniques allows sectional imaging .

It is based on the principle that an image of an unknown object can be obtained if one has an infinite number of projections through the object.

Two scans through the body gives an image in x- and y-direction (side view and front view). With increasing number of scans over a 360° angle range provides a set of images which allow to construct the three dimensional structure of the body.


For X-ray tomography a planar slice of the body is defined and X-rays are passed along this plane in all directions. To produce a tomographic image typically 100 to 1000 scans are required.

To store the multitude of images and process the data requires computer.

The two-dimensional image corresponds to a three dimensional section of the patient with the third dimension being the slice thickness which is typically a few millimeter thick.

The resulting spatial resolution is 1 mm, a density discrimination (contrast) of better than 1% can be obtained with this technique.


Present CT machines have an rotatable X-ray source. This allows to scan the patient who is located along the rotational axis from all sides and angles. The image receptor system is designed as a stationary ring of detectors around the patient which receive the portions of the fanned X-ray beam.


Each data point acquired by the detector array is a transmission measurement through the patient along a given line x between source and detector pixel.

Each data point therefore follows the basic equation:

The attenuation coefficient p represents the sum of all attenuation coefficients along the line x:


From the image information the projection P(x)of the image is calculated:

Because the attenuation coefficient mcorresponds directly to the density of the body tissue along the projection axis x, the projection corresponds to the density.

From a complete scan along different axes (x, f) the cross sectional density along the slice can be constructed using Fourier analysis methods.


From the image information the projection P(x)of the image is calculated :

The projection is directly proportional to the summed attenuation coefficient and to the length x through the body.

Because the attenuation coefficient m corresponds directly to the density of the body tissue along the projection axis x, the projection corresponds to the density.

From a complete scan along different axes (x, f) the cross sectional density along the slice can be constructed using Fourier analysis methods.


The resulting CT image is a two-dimensional matrix of numbers with each number corresponding to a spatial location in image and patient along the plane of the slice. The matrix is constructed from 512x512 pixels.

Each pixel has a value (up to 4096=12 bits) which corresponds to the level of gray (darkness, attenuation). This number is called CT number and contains the physical information ( attenuation  density ) about the corresponding body section.

As the attenuation coefficient ranges between m=0 (air) and m=1 (metal inlet) the attenuation is scaled to a maximum of 4096. The CT therefore corresponds to a two-dimensional map of attenuation across the body slice.

The CT number CT is normalized to the attenuation of water:

If the attenuation coefficient for a given pixel is equal to water, the CT number=0, soft tissue material has CT number in the range of -100 to +100, dense tissues like bones have high CT numbers from 300 to 3000.

CT numbers are rescaled attenuation coefficients!


Typical Radiation Doses in Radiographic and in CT Examinations

The radiation dose received in CT is considerably higher than that of conventional screen radiography.

To compare the two types of X-ray exposures the received dose D of X-ray radiation is converted to integral dose DI, which corresponds to the total amount of energy deposited in the body tissue of mass m:


In radiographic examinations the dose is not distributed evenly but

drops from the entrance dose at the skin D0towards deeper layers.

The integral dose is described by:

For the skull m  0.33 cm1, A 256 cm2, the typical entrance dose is D04.8 mGy. This yields for the integral dose:

DI = 3.7J

The integral dose in a seven slice head CT is about twenty times higher than the integral dose of a single X-ray exposure.