On implementing an esl teacher education program using information technology
Download
1 / 37

On Implementing an ESL Teacher Education Program Using Information Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 145 Views
  • Uploaded on

On Implementing an ESL Teacher Education Program Using Information Technology. Andreas Schramm [email protected] Ann Mabbott [email protected] Hamline University St. Paul, Minnesota. Overview. I. Background II. Course Development III. Course Support IV. Course Delivery

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'On Implementing an ESL Teacher Education Program Using Information Technology' - issac


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
On implementing an esl teacher education program using information technology l.jpg

On Implementing an ESL Teacher Education Program Using Information Technology

Andreas Schramm

[email protected]

Ann Mabbott

[email protected]

Hamline University

St. Paul, Minnesota


Overview l.jpg
Overview Information Technology

I. Background

II. Course Development

III. Course Support

IV. Course Delivery

V. Conclusion


I background l.jpg
I. Background Information Technology

  • Elements of a Quality Online Teacher Education Program

    • Interaction among students and between the professor and the students is central.

    • Education is student-centered and constructivist in nature.

    • There is an emphasis on practical application as well as a strong theoretical background.


Background of our program l.jpg
Background of our Program Information Technology

  • MA in ESL with teacher licensure located in Minnesota

  • 3 separate tracks for teachers of:

    a. K-12 students in the US,

    b. Immigrant and refugee adults in the US, and

    c. overseas learners of English.


Background of our program5 l.jpg
Background of our Program Information Technology

  • Most of our students are practicing ESL teachers by the time they finish, if not before.

  • Most are adding the MA in ESL to previous credentials in teaching or applied linguistics.

  • Students live both close to and far from campus.


Slide6 l.jpg


Ii course development l.jpg
II. Course Development as Content (21 credits)

  • Must be planned and deliberate within theoretical framework

  • We conducted initial analysis to identify theoretical framework

  • There are similarities and differences between traditional and online courses


Slide8 l.jpg

  • Differences: as Content (21 credits)

    • access,

    • medium,

    • interaction amount,

    • learner control,

    • interactivity

      (e.g., Herring, 1996; Warschauer, Shetzer, & Meloni, 2000),

    • expanded teacher roles, etc.

      (Bennett & Lockyer, 2004)


Slide9 l.jpg

  • Similarities as Content (21 credits)

    • motivation,

    • setting designed for learning,

    • language communication,

    • visuals, etc.

      (e.g., Brumfit, Phillips, & Skehan, 1985; Herring, 1996)


Slide10 l.jpg


Slide11 l.jpg


Slide12 l.jpg


Slide13 l.jpg


Implementation l.jpg
Implementation communication:

  • Lectures:

    • public, instructor-student one-way communication delivered

      • statically as Web page

      • as slideshow-sound combination

      • synchronously via web-conferencing


Implementation15 l.jpg
Implementation communication:

  • Whole-class meetings:

    • public, instructor-student, student-student multi-directional delivered

      • dynamically via bulletin board or

      • via chat room

      • synchronously via web-conferencing


Slide16 l.jpg

Implementation communication:

  • Small-group meetings:

    • public, instructor-student, student-student multi-directional delivered to student subset

      • dynamically via bulletin board or

      • via chat room

      • outcome collated collaboratively via Wiki


Implementation17 l.jpg
Implementation communication:

  • Informal exchanges:

    • public, student-student, multi-directional delivered

      • dynamically via bulletin board, chat room, or web-conferencing to students only

      • pair-share tasks via text boxes and immediate student-initiated text feedback


Implementation18 l.jpg
Implementation communication:

  • Off-to-the-side & Office hours:

    • private, instructor-student & student-student implemented using

      • individual email

      • web-conferencing


Slide19 l.jpg


Implementation20 l.jpg
Implementation communication:

  • Language:

    • informal

    • humorous

      (Koetter 2002)


Implementation21 l.jpg
Implementation communication:

  • Content & Visuals kept intact:

    • speech sounds in linguistics via streamed sound files

    • streamed educational videos

    • video-taped ESL teaching techniques

    • Jeopardy game slideshow for syntax review

    • Flash exercises, e.g. drag-and-drop


Iii course support l.jpg
III. Course Support communication:

  • Course recreation takes two phases

    • course design

    • program planning and coordination


Slide23 l.jpg


Slide24 l.jpg

  • Additional Staffing Needs communication:

    • Faculty need more time

      • higher discussion participation

      • assessment items handling

    • Staff

      • adminstrative, e.g. orientation, student questions

      • tech support


Slide25 l.jpg

  • Library staff communication:

    • online or phone reference desk work

    • library orientation materials


Slide26 l.jpg

  • Instructional Technology Staff for communication:

    • re-creation of course activities, materials

    • electronic preparation of additional materials (audio, video, orientation, etc.)

    • identification and implementation of instructional hardware


Iv program delivery l.jpg
IV. Program Delivery communication:

  • Main program objectives

    • deliver course content

    • allow interaction with material

    • facilitate learning interactively

    • address multiple learning styles

    • advise on academic theses


Slide28 l.jpg

  • Comparable delivery communication:

    • Learning Management System Blackboard:

      • classroom

      • video

      • audio

      • handouts

      • slideshows

      • images

      • illustrations

      • exercises


Slide29 l.jpg


Slide30 l.jpg

  • Other Software communication:

    • Flash animation, e.g. pair-share exercises

    • Wiki for collaboration on documents

    • digitization software for preparation, delivery of video and audio materials


Slide31 l.jpg


V conclusion l.jpg
V. Conclusion communication:

  • Frydenberg (2002) lists nine domains of quality are the basis for setting course standards.

    Today we addressed the first two:

    • design and development

    • instruction and instructor services


Slide33 l.jpg

  • Others need to be addressed as well: communication:

    • executive commitment

    • technological infrastructure

    • student services

    • program delivery

    • financial health

    • legal and regulatory requirements and

    • program evaluation


Program evaluation l.jpg
Program Evaluation communication:

  • Program evaluation and continual improvement more challenging than for campus programs

  • but necessary to ensure program quality.


Reference list l.jpg
Reference List communication:

  • Bennett, S. & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming and online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International, 41(3), 231-244.

  • Brumfit, C., Phillips, M., & Skehan, P. (Eds.). (1985). Computers in English language teaching. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • Frydenberg, J. (2002). Qualitative standards in eLearning: A matrix of analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3 (2), Retrieved February 21, 2003, from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.2/frydenberg.html

  • Herring, S. (Ed.). (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


Reference list36 l.jpg
Reference List communication:

  • Hymes, D. (1972) Introduction. In C. Cazden, V. John, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. xi–xvii). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  • Kötter, M. (2002) Tandem learning on the internet. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang Publishing.

  • Mabbott, A. & Schramm, A.(2005).Course quality in online English-as-a-Second-Language teacher education. In M. Bigelow & C. Walker (Eds.), Creating teacher community: Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Language Teacher Education. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.


Reference list37 l.jpg
Reference List communication:

  • Third International Conference on Language Teacher Education. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.

  • Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation (pp. 3–33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Schramm, A. (2005). Making online students connect: Ethnographic strategies for developing online learning experiences. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Languages and distance education: Evolution and change. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.


ad