400 likes | 628 Views
Criteria for Diagnosis of MM. *Note: These criteria identify Stage IB and Stages II and III A/B myeloma by Durie/Salmon stage. Stage IA becomes smoldering or indolent myeloma;
E N D
1. Dalla terapia ad alte dosi alla talidomide e agli inibitori del proteasoma: una storia terapeutica in evoluzione Maria Teresa Ambrosini Slide 1.
The aim of research in cancer therapy is targeted therapy (like Glivec or Rituximab).
In the management of myeloma we are not, as yet, seeing cures, but in the few last years, we have a acquired new treatment that have enabled steps toward this goal.
Cancer is complex, most are the result of multisteps events
Redundancy in most signalling patways
Multitargeted therapySlide 1.
The aim of research in cancer therapy is targeted therapy (like Glivec or Rituximab).
In the management of myeloma we are not, as yet, seeing cures, but in the few last years, we have a acquired new treatment that have enabled steps toward this goal.
Cancer is complex, most are the result of multisteps events
Redundancy in most signalling patways
Multitargeted therapy
2. Criteria for Diagnosis of MM
3. Melphalan and Prednisone (MP) Conventional chemotherapy in use for over 40 years
Partial Response: 50-60%
Complete Response 1%
Median Overall Survival 3 years
Equivalent mortality and survival between MP and combination chemotherapy
5. High dose Melphalan with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Complete Response rate increased from 1 - 3% to 30 - 50%
Remission extended from 18 to 30 months
Overall survival doubled from 30 to 60 months
6. Randomized studies: High Dose Therapy versus Standard Chemotherapy
7. Single vs Double ASCT Slide 6 Single vs Double ASCT
Attalo ha follow up adeguato 7 anni
Single vs double auto-transplantation in newly diagnosed MM patients was compared
The results of Attal et al suggested that double transplantation improves overall survival of patients with myeloma
In contrast with the findings of the Attal group, there was no difference in event-free survival or overall survival in the trial by Fermand et al
Attal M et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2495
Fermand JP et al. Blood. 2001;98:815a [abstract 3387]
Sonneveld P et al. Blood. 2004;104:271a [abstract 948]
Slide 6 Single vs Double ASCT
Attalo ha follow up adeguato 7 anni
Single vs double auto-transplantation in newly diagnosed MM patients was compared
The results of Attal et al suggested that double transplantation improves overall survival of patients with myeloma
In contrast with the findings of the Attal group, there was no difference in event-free survival or overall survival in the trial by Fermand et al
Attal M et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2495
Fermand JP et al. Blood. 2001;98:815a [abstract 3387]
Sonneveld P et al. Blood. 2004;104:271a [abstract 948]
8. Multiple Myeloma
9. Multiple Myeloma
12. Thalidomide Precise mechanism of action not yet understood
Multiple actions:
antiangiogenic effects that provide the rationale for its use in MM
immunomodulatory effect
apoptotic effect
Thalidomide was first shown to be effective as a single agent in patiens with relapsed and refractory disease
(Singhal S et al. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1565)
Numerous subsequent studies have confirmed its efficacy with a response rate of 30% alone, 50% when used in combination with dexamethasone and 70% with chemotherapy. Slide XX
Thalidomide was first shown to be effective as a single agent in patiens with relapsed and refractory disease (Sighal 1999), Numerous subsequent studies have confirmed its efficacy with a response rate of 30% alone and 60% when used in combination with dexamethasone.
This remarkable efficacy has led to the use of thalidomide at earlier stages of the disease and its role as a maintenance or in HD therapy is also being evaluated.Slide XX
Thalidomide was first shown to be effective as a single agent in patiens with relapsed and refractory disease (Sighal 1999), Numerous subsequent studies have confirmed its efficacy with a response rate of 30% alone and 60% when used in combination with dexamethasone.
This remarkable efficacy has led to the use of thalidomide at earlier stages of the disease and its role as a maintenance or in HD therapy is also being evaluated.
13. Thalidomide/dexamethasone combination
14. Thalidomide/Dexamethasone vs Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Phase III Clinical Trial, newly diagnosed MM for whom stem cell transplantation was considerate appropriate
Thalidomide 200 mg daily p.o. + Dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. on days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20 or Dexamethasone alone
Every 4 week Slide 17. Slide 17.
15. Thalidomide/Dexamethasone vs Dexamethasone: Drug-Related Adverse Events Slide 16. Thalidomide/Dexamethasone vs Dexamethasone: Drug-Related
Adverse Events
More grade 3 and 4 adverse events were reported for patients who were treated with the thalidomide/dexamethasone combination compared with dexamethasone alone
In particular, the frequency of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the thalidomide/dexamethasone arm was significantly higher compared with the dexamethasone arm (17% vs 3%, P<0.0001)
Rajkumar SV et al. Blood. 2004;104(part 1):63a [abstract 205]
Slide 16. Thalidomide/Dexamethasone vs Dexamethasone: Drug-Related
Adverse Events
More grade 3 and 4 adverse events were reported for patients who were treated with the thalidomide/dexamethasone combination compared with dexamethasone alone
In particular, the frequency of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the thalidomide/dexamethasone arm was significantly higher compared with the dexamethasone arm (17% vs 3%, P<0.0001)
Rajkumar SV et al. Blood. 2004;104(part 1):63a [abstract 205]
16. Thalidomide Chemotherapy combinations
17. Thalidomide With Melphalan and Prednisone in Elderly Patients With MM Thalidomide With Melphalan and Prednisone in Elderly Patients With
MM
In this phase III randomized controlled trial, 255 patients with newly diagnosed MM, who were over the age of 65 years, were randomized to receive treatment with either thalidomide, oral melphalan, and prednisone or oral melphalan and prednisone. Median age for both arms was 72 years
Palumbo A et al. Blood. 2005;106:230a [abstract 779]Thalidomide With Melphalan and Prednisone in Elderly Patients With
MM
In this phase III randomized controlled trial, 255 patients with newly diagnosed MM, who were over the age of 65 years, were randomized to receive treatment with either thalidomide, oral melphalan, and prednisone or oral melphalan and prednisone. Median age for both arms was 72 years
Palumbo A et al. Blood. 2005;106:230a [abstract 779]
18. MPT in Elderly Patients With MM: Response MPT in Elderly Patients With MM: Response
Addition of thalidomide to oral melphalan and prednisone was associated with significantly greater response rates in these newly diagnosed, elderly MM patients; the overall response rate (CR + nCR + PR) was 76% vs 47% for MPT and MP, respectively
A significant improvement in event-free survival was seen in the MPT arm compared with the MP arm
Significant differences in overall survival were seen after 9 mo
Other effects of MPT included improvements in performance status, skeletal pain, anemia, and the need for transfusion
Palumbo A et al. Blood. 2005;106:230a [abstract 779]MPT in Elderly Patients With MM: Response
Addition of thalidomide to oral melphalan and prednisone was associated with significantly greater response rates in these newly diagnosed, elderly MM patients; the overall response rate (CR + nCR + PR) was 76% vs 47% for MPT and MP, respectively
A significant improvement in event-free survival was seen in the MPT arm compared with the MP arm
Significant differences in overall survival were seen after 9 mo
Other effects of MPT included improvements in performance status, skeletal pain, anemia, and the need for transfusion
Palumbo A et al. Blood. 2005;106:230a [abstract 779]
19. Thromboembolism in MPT-Treated Elderly Patients Reduced With Prophylaxis Slide 100. Thromboembolism in MPT-Treated Elderly Patients Reduced With
Prophylaxis
Treatment of these patients with MPT was associated with more adverse events compared with MP, particularly deep vein thromboses (DVT; P=0.003) and neurotoxicities (P<0.001)
Thromboembolism in MPT-treated patients was reduced with prophylactic use of enoxaparin, 0.4 mL/day for 4 months
Palumbo A et al. Blood. 2004;104(part 1):63a [abstract 207]Slide 100. Thromboembolism in MPT-Treated Elderly Patients Reduced With
Prophylaxis
Treatment of these patients with MPT was associated with more adverse events compared with MP, particularly deep vein thromboses (DVT; P=0.003) and neurotoxicities (P<0.001)
Thromboembolism in MPT-treated patients was reduced with prophylactic use of enoxaparin, 0.4 mL/day for 4 months
Palumbo A et al. Blood. 2004;104(part 1):63a [abstract 207]
20. MP vs MP-Thal and MP vs Mel100 in Newly Diagnosed MM Patients Aged 65–75 Years Slide 102. MP vs MP-Thal and MP vs Mel100 in Newly Diagnosed MM Patients
Aged 65–75 Years: IFM 99-06 Trial Response to Treatment
Response data are available from the planned second interim analysis (July 4, 2004); median follow-up time = 28 months
Total patients analyzed = 340 (350 for toxicity); MP = 153; MP-Thal = 95; MEL100 = 92
MP-Thal and MEL100 response rates are similar
Overall survival data do not support stopping patient recruitment in any arm
A third interim analysis is planned
Facon T et al. Blood. 2004;104(part 1):63a [abstract 206]
Slide 102. MP vs MP-Thal and MP vs Mel100 in Newly Diagnosed MM Patients
Aged 65–75 Years: IFM 99-06 Trial Response to Treatment
Response data are available from the planned second interim analysis (July 4, 2004); median follow-up time = 28 months
Total patients analyzed = 340 (350 for toxicity); MP = 153; MP-Thal = 95; MEL100 = 92
MP-Thal and MEL100 response rates are similar
Overall survival data do not support stopping patient recruitment in any arm
A third interim analysis is planned
Facon T et al. Blood. 2004;104(part 1):63a [abstract 206]
21. Maintenance With Thalidomide after ASCT Slide 109. Maintenance With Thalidomide After ASCT for MM
In the management of aggressive myeloma, almost all patients ultimately relapse after high-dose therapy supported with ASCT
The Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM) is conducting a study to evaluate the effect of thalidomide maintenance treatment on the duration of response after high-dose therapy and ASCT
Attal M et al. Blood. 2004;104(part 1):155a [abstract 535]
Slide 109. Maintenance With Thalidomide After ASCT for MM
In the management of aggressive myeloma, almost all patients ultimately relapse after high-dose therapy supported with ASCT
The Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM) is conducting a study to evaluate the effect of thalidomide maintenance treatment on the duration of response after high-dose therapy and ASCT
Attal M et al. Blood. 2004;104(part 1):155a [abstract 535]
22. CC5013 is more potent and less toxic than the parent compound
Induces apoptosis in MM cells
Decreases binding of MM cells to bone marrow stromal cells
Inhibits cytokine production (IL-6, VEGF, TNF-alfa)
Blocks angiogenesis
23. Phase III Trial of Lenalidomide/Dex in Relapsed or Refractory MM Two Phase III Trials of Lenalidomide/Dex in Relapsed or
Refractory MM
Phase I trials showed the MTD of lenalidomide to be 25 mg/day. Phase II trials showed that an interrupted 25-mg daily dose maintained response with ameliorated myelosuppression, forming the basis for the dosing used in these phase II trials
Patients in arm 1 were given lenalidomide on days 1–21 (placebo on days 22–28) and high-dose dexamethasone ([HDD] 40 mg) in the typical pulsed fashion on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20. Patients in arm 2 were given placebo on days 1–28 and HDD on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20. Treatment was continued for 4 cycles and thereafter with HDD on days 1–4 only until disease progression
Primary endpoint was time to progression (by Bladé criteria). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), safety (toxicity), 1st skeletal-related event, decreased performance status (PS)
Patients were additionally stratified according to ?2M (=2.5 mg/dL vs >2.5 mg/dL), prior transplant (0 vs >1) and prior MM treatment regimens (<1 vs >1)
Inclusion criteria: refractory or relapsing MM, =3 previous regimens
Exclusion criteria: resistance to >200 mg Dex over 1 month, liver enzymes <3 ? normal, creatinine <2 mg/dL
Weber D. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; May 13–17, 2005; Orlando, FL. Available at: http://ir.celgene.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=111960&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=709974&highlight=
Dimopoulous M et al. Blood. 2005;106:6a [abstract 6]Two Phase III Trials of Lenalidomide/Dex in Relapsed or
Refractory MM
Phase I trials showed the MTD of lenalidomide to be 25 mg/day. Phase II trials showed that an interrupted 25-mg daily dose maintained response with ameliorated myelosuppression, forming the basis for the dosing used in these phase II trials
Patients in arm 1 were given lenalidomide on days 1–21 (placebo on days 22–28) and high-dose dexamethasone ([HDD] 40 mg) in the typical pulsed fashion on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20. Patients in arm 2 were given placebo on days 1–28 and HDD on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20. Treatment was continued for 4 cycles and thereafter with HDD on days 1–4 only until disease progression
Primary endpoint was time to progression (by Bladé criteria). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), safety (toxicity), 1st skeletal-related event, decreased performance status (PS)
Patients were additionally stratified according to ?2M (=2.5 mg/dL vs >2.5 mg/dL), prior transplant (0 vs >1) and prior MM treatment regimens (<1 vs >1)
Inclusion criteria: refractory or relapsing MM, =3 previous regimens
Exclusion criteria: resistance to >200 mg Dex over 1 month, liver enzymes <3 ? normal, creatinine <2 mg/dL
Weber D. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; May 13–17, 2005; Orlando, FL. Available at: http://ir.celgene.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=111960&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=709974&highlight=
Dimopoulous M et al. Blood. 2005;106:6a [abstract 6]
24. Phase III Trial of Lenalidomide/Dex in Relapsed or Refractory MM
25. Bortezomib
26. APEX : Treatment plan Slide XX
Velcade PS-341 č il primo inibitore del proteasoma ad essere testato in clinical trial
Fase II: SUMMIT; CREST
Bortezomib proteasome inhibitor
Richardson et al compared bortezomib with high dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM, who had received one to three prior therapySlide XX
Velcade PS-341 č il primo inibitore del proteasoma ad essere testato in clinical trial
Fase II: SUMMIT; CREST
Bortezomib proteasome inhibitor
Richardson et al compared bortezomib with high dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM, who had received one to three prior therapy
27. APEX: Outcome
28. APEX: response rates (CR, PR)
29. APEX: Treatment-emergent = grade 3 AEs reported by = 5% of patients Among the 331 patients in the VELCADE group, the only ? Grade 3 adverse events occurring at an incidence > 10% were thrombocytopenia (97 patients; 29%) and neutropenia (48 patients; 15%).
The only ? Grade 3 adverse event that occurred at an incidence > 10% among the 332 dexamethasone-treated patients was anemia NOS (35 patients; 11%). Among the 331 patients in the VELCADE group, the only ? Grade 3 adverse events occurring at an incidence > 10% were thrombocytopenia (97 patients; 29%) and neutropenia (48 patients; 15%).
The only ? Grade 3 adverse event that occurred at an incidence > 10% among the 332 dexamethasone-treated patients was anemia NOS (35 patients; 11%).
30. Bortezomib alone and in combination with Dexamethasone for untreated MM Treatment
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycle
Dexamethasone 40 mg P.O. on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 added if <PR after 2 cycles or <CR after 4 cycles
31. PAD combination therapy (bortezomib (PS-341), Adriamycin and Dexamethasone) for untreated MM
32. VTD (VELCADE®, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone) as Primary Therapy for Newly-Diagnosed MM Treatment:
Bortezomib 1.0 to 1.9 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11 q 28 days
Thalidomide 100-200 mg each evening
Dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20 q 28 days
28- day treatment cycle, 2 cycles
Institutional experience of 36 patients
92% Response rate (CR+PR)
PBSC easily collected
33. A phase I/II study of Bortezomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone (V-MP) in Elderly Untreated MM patients
34. V-MP: Response Rates (N=53)
35. V-MP: Conclusions High Response Rate
Manageable toxicities:
Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the only Gr3 events
Basis for VISTA Phase III trial (n=680): VMP vs MP
39. Combinations therapies in Multiple Myeloma Bortezomib + Thalidomide
+/- cytotoxic drugs
40. Take home message