1 / 13

LCME Determination 2013 Geisel School of Medicine

LCME Determination 2013 Geisel School of Medicine. Richard J Simons MD, MACP Senior Associate Dean for Medical Education Associate Vice President for Health Affairs. The Good News . . . . Accreditation Status. Continued accreditation for an eight-year term Next survey: 2020/2021.

isra
Download Presentation

LCME Determination 2013 Geisel School of Medicine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LCME Determination 2013Geisel School of Medicine Richard J Simons MD, MACP Senior Associate Dean for Medical Education Associate Vice President for Health Affairs

  2. The Good News . . .

  3. Accreditation Status • Continued accreditation for an eight-year term • Next survey: 2020/2021

  4. And, we have lot’s to do!

  5. Non-Compliance Areas • IS-12 Inter-professional education: students should have opportunity to learn in environments with students enrolled in other health professions • IS-16 Diversity: the institution must have policies and place to achieve appropriate diversity among its students, faculty and staff *Finding: lack of a coordinated and systematic strategy to increase diversity of the faculty*

  6. Non-Compliance Areas 3. ED-1 Institutional Objectives *Finding: While there are well-defined objectives, it is unclear how these overarching objectives are used to design the objectives and learning outcomes of the courses/clerkships. It is unclear how the clerkship directors utilized the school wide objectives to develop the form.

  7. Non-Compliance Areas 4. ED-8 Comparability across sites (repeat citation!) *Finding: efforts to collate data in clerkships began in 2010 but analysis and action plan to respond to differences across sites has yet to occur.

  8. Non-Compliance Areas 5. FA-10 Annual Faculty Reviews *Annual reviews with faculty is not uniformly practiced*

  9. Compliance with monitoring areas • ED-5A Active Learning *Finding: although there has been progress, pedagogy remains predominantly lecture based* • ED-24 Resident as Teachers *Finding: independent student analysis raised concerns about resident preparation for teaching. A centralized program has just been initiated

  10. Compliance with monitoring areas • ED-33, ED-35 Integrated Responsibility and Curriculum Review *Finding: The MEC now has a codified process of reviewing courses, not all components and segments of curriculum have undergone review. The process does not contain a plan for periodic review of the components of the curriculum. *

  11. Compliance with monitoring areas • ED-38 Duty Hours *Finding: “There remain issues relating to duty hours with a few clerkships, notably, surgery, ob-gyn and inpatient pediatrics which are being addressed.” • MS-8 Pipeline Programs to Enhance Diversity

  12. Compliance with monitoring areas 6. MS-32 Student Mistreatment *Finding: The AAMC GQ demonstrated a high level of student mistreatment. Geisel has implemented a number of programs to address this issue.*

  13. Thanks for your efforts in this process!

More Related