slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Confidential Close Call Reporting System

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 20

Confidential Close Call Reporting System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 93 Views
  • Uploaded on

Confidential Close Call Reporting System. Jeff Moller Association of American Railroads International Railroad Safety Conference October 2008, Goa. What is a ‘Close Call?’.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Confidential Close Call Reporting System' - isi


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Confidential Close Call Reporting System

Jeff Moller

Association of American Railroads

International Railroad Safety Conference

October 2008, Goa

what is a close call
What is a ‘Close Call?’

“Opportunity to improve safety practices based on a condition / incident with a potential for more serious consequences.”

July 26, 2000

one component of a safety management process
One Component of a Safety Management Process
  • Mandatory reporting of accidents / incidents
  • Inspection and enforcement activities
  • Close Call Reporting System
slide4

Heinrich Pyramid

ACCIDENTS

INCIDENTS

UNREPORTED

OCCURRENCES

features of a close call system
Features of a Close Call System
  • Voluntary / Confidential
  • Accidents Often Preceded by Close Calls
  • Identify and Manage Risk
  • More Information Collected / Shared
  • Data Collected by Third Party
a new approach

How It Is Now . . .

How It Should Be . . .

You are highly trained

You are human

and

and

If you did as trained, you would not make mistakes

Humans make mistakes

so

so

Let’s also explore why the system allowed, or failed to accommodate, your mistake

You weren’t careful enough

so

and

You should be PUNISHED!

Let’s IMPROVE THE SYSTEM!

A New Approach
slide7

Potential Barriers

  • Concerns About:
      • Public Disclosure
      • Job Sanctions/Enforcement
      • Criminal Sanctions
      • Civil Litigation
everyone wins
Everyone Wins
  • Non-Attributable Safety Information that Otherwise Would Not be Reported
  • Everyone Focuses on Safety
  • Better Public Image: Transportation Safer and Less Costly
  • Wider Awareness of Human Factors
  • Enhances Partnerships, Trust and Communications Within Organizations
benefits for labor
Benefits for Labor
  • “Instead of the brunt of blame / punishment, labor becomes a valuable source of information about potential problems and proposed solutions to accomplish what everyone wants – improved safety and reduced costs.”
  • Independence from management and regulators ensures reporter’s anonymity
  • More teamwork
  • Work less stressful
  • The reporter can be advised of the outcome
benefits for industry
Benefits for Industry
  • Improved safety: Supports a safety culture with more public accountability
  • Permit errors/deficiencies/discrepancies to be reported without attachment of blame
  • Cost savings (insurance, accident, injury claims, litigation, loss of time, property, damage)
  • Improved effectiveness of remedies and greater cost effectiveness implementing the remedies.
  • Better employee morale and productivity
benefits for regulator
Benefits for Regulator
  • Less need for regulations
  • Fewer enforcement activities
  • Easier to understand what is not working and why
  • Remedies are more effective and credible
  • Better management–labor relations
lessons learned from other close call systems
Lessons Learned from Other Close Call Systems
  • Encourage full disclosure / build and maintain trust
  • Focus learning, not punishment: Assure anonymity and (limited) protection from liability and enforcement
  • Include all stakeholders, engage front-line staff in system design
  • Structure system for easy organization and analysis
  • Use 3rd party for data collection and analysis
  • Provide timely feedback to reporting employee
  • Continuous feedback to all key stakeholders, including reporter of close call
close call planning committee
Close Call Planning Committee

First meeting; May 2002

  • White Paper: Improving Safety through Understanding Close Calls
  • Designed / oversaw FRA Human Factors Workshop: Improving Railroad Safety Through Understanding Close Calls
  • Committee Evolved to Current Steering Committee
slide14

2003 Workshop

http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/Research/ord0403.pdf

model memorandum of understanding mou
Model Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
  • Signed March 30, 2005
  • Describes provisions of project
  • Explains rights, roles, & responsibilities of participants,
  • Purpose: gain full agreement from all parties
  • Implementing MOUs still needed for each carrier pilot site
criteria for optimal pilot site
Criteria for Optimal Pilot Site
  • Representative of industry; learning can be generalized
  • Site supports participation at managerial / local levels
  • Carrier rates average or above in safety
  • Organizational culture supports project
  • Existing cooperative relationship; management & labor
  • Carrier provides resources to support project
  • A contained region with local autonomy
carrier resources needed
Carrier Resources Needed
  • Training
  • Mentoring
  • Nurture change process
  • Develop / implement communication plan
  • Planning / conducting quarterly Peer Team meetings
  • Join Steering Committee
slide19

Pilot Project

  • More than 300 Cases in First 7 Months
  • Some Initial Issues
      • Slow orders
      • Use of Derails
      • Run through switches
      • Derailment
      • Permanent Speed / Max Authorized
      • Stop and Proceed
pilot project initial outcomes
Pilot Project – Initial Outcomes
  • Countermeasures
  • Cultural Changes
  • Dispute Resolution – Needs Work
  • Other Pilot Sites Coming
ad