Jwst fgs guide star studies
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

JWST FGS Guide Star Studies PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 90 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

JWST FGS Guide Star Studies. TIPS/JIM Nov. 19, 2009 Sherie Holfeltz with Ed Nelan & Pierre Chayer. JWST Guide Star ID & ACQ. The following steps are part of the JWST guide star identification and acquisition process:

Download Presentation

JWST FGS Guide Star Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Jwst fgs guide star studies

JWST FGS Guide Star Studies

TIPS/JIM

Nov. 19, 2009

Sherie Holfeltz

with

Ed Nelan & Pierre Chayer


Jwst guide star id acq

JWST Guide Star ID & ACQ

  • The following steps are part of the JWST guide star identification and acquisition process:

    • The ground system must provide a local catalog containing the positions and expected electron count rates, as measured by the FGS, for the guide star and several reference objects

    • An Identification image is taken and the observed scene is pattern-matched to the uplinked catalog

    • If ID or ACQ fails for one guide star candidate, try the next guide star candidate and its reference objects. Up to 3 guide star candidates may be tried

  • Several studies have been undertaken, touching on many aspects of the guide star ID process


The uplinked local catalog

The Uplinked Local Catalog

  • JWST will use GSC-II + 2MASS for guide stars

    • Deepest all-sky survey available

    • Optical catalog (B, R, I eff= 0.47, 0.64, 0.85 m)

  • FGS operates from 0.6 - 5m

  • For stars without 2MASS mags, GSC-II mags will be transformed into NIR

Flux of M0 Star at

J = 18.5

GSC-II pass bands

2MASS pass bands

FGS pass band


Magnitude transformations

Magnitude Transformations

Transformations derived for stars at high galactic latitudes (|b|>40o)

  • cross correlated GSC-II with 2MASS

  • Fit polynomials to color-color diagrams


Testing the magnitude transformations

Testing The Magnitude Transformations

  • Tested by comparing predicted NIR mags to observed mags from CFHT & UKIDSS/LAS

  • Allowed testing of GSC-II down to the faint limit of the FGS

  • Transformations sufficiently accurate when applied to stars; mean mag ~ 0 and 1- errors < 0.4, except for Ks-band predictions when GSC-II lacks I-band magnitude


Predicted nir magnitudes

Predicted NIR Magnitudes

  • GSC-II matched to UKIDSS/LAS

  • GSC-II optical mags median B,R,I = 19.5, 18.1, 17.0faint cutoffs for B,R,I = 22.5, 20.8, 18.5

  • GSC-II optical mags  NIR

  • Predicted compared to observed magnitudes

  • Predicted:median J,H,K = 16.4, 15.8, 15.742% predicted JAB < 18

  • Observed:32% observed JAB < 18


Pattern matching in the id image

Pattern Matching in the ID Image

  • FGS identifies the guide star in its FOV by matching the ground supplied predicted scene (red) with the observed scene (blue).

  • Challenges include:

    • pointing error

    • s/c jitter and drift

    • cosmic rays

    • missing objects

    • surprise objects

    • mis-classed objects

    • catalog contamination


Missing objects

Missing Objects

  • ~10% of GSC-II objects are artifacts, not real objects

    • No match in SDSS or UKIDSS and are not seen in HST images

    • Tendency to be detected in only one GSC-II pass band

    • Usually near (faint) plate limit

    • No way to identify them as artifacts based solely on GSC-II data

  • Faint blue objects may drop out in NIR

B,R,I = (20.5, 18.8, 17.1)

I-Band Image

R-Band Image


Surprise objects

Surprise Objects

  • GSC-II is ~69% complete down to JAB < 19.5 for both stars and non-stars, based on cross correlating with ~400 deg2 of UKIDSS/LAS catalog at high galactic latitudes. For every two objects predicted to be in the FGS FOV, there will be one additional surprise object

  • Objects classified as non-stars in GSC-II out number the stars by 2 to 4 times at high galactic latitudes (|b| > 30)

  • These objects are bright enough to be seen in the guide star ID image

  • If not accounted for in the predicted scene, the FGS may fail to identify the guide star due to pattern match confusion


Gsc ii non stars

GSC-II Non-Stars

This study had two goals:

  • Characterize the GSC-II objects classified as non-stars to evaluate their affect on the FGS’s ability to identify the guide star

  • Evaluate whether or not the nature of the non-stars could be understood in a meaningful way on an object-by-object basis using only GSC-II parameters


Characterizing gsc ii non stars

Characterizing GSC-II Non-Stars

  • Archival HST (ACS/WFC) images used to study the non-stars

  • Objects detected in ACS images were matched to GSC-II catalog

  • Sizes and shapes from the GSC-II catalog were compared to those measured from the HST images

  • GSC-II sizes and shapes were not found to be predictive of non-star characteristics:

    • GSC-II size was strongly correlated with brightness

    • Dispersion of GSC-II eccentricity strongly correlated with faintness

  • Size and shape distributions similar for stars & non-stars; most objects of both types have small size measures

  • Non-stars should be used as reference objects for guide star ID pattern match


Catalog errors

Catalog Errors

  • Contamination, e.g., binary stars

    • JWST will use GSC-II at its faint end, where catalog contamination rate is estimated to be ~12 - 15%

  • Object type mis-classification

    • GSC-II mis-classifies ~25% of its stars as non-stars based on SDSS and UKIDSS/LAS data cross correlated with GSC-II

    • A visual inspection of GSC-II objects matched to HST images (at high galactic latitudes) estimated that up to 20% of both GSC-II stars and non-stars are mis-classed

    • Mis-classifications more prevalent at the faint end of the catalog, where JWST will be operating

  • Catalog artifacts

    • ~10% of GSC-II objects are artifacts

  • Errors in optical-to-NIR magnitude transformations

    • Garbage in, garbage out

    • Non-preferred transformation methods


Up to 3 guide star candidates

Up to 3 Guide Star Candidates?

  • Allowing 3 candidate guide stars (if available), each with an 85% success rate, yields a combined success rate of 99.7%

  • Will we routinely have 3 candidate guide stars available?

  • Guide star availability studies

    • Confirmed previous assumption that the Poisson distribution is a reasonable approximation to the distribution of stars in GSC-II over local regions of the sky

    • # of GSC-II guide stars per FGS FOV at high galactic latitudes

    • # of 2MASS guide stars per FGS FOV at low galactic latitudes


Gsc ii guide star availability at high galactic latitudes

GSC-II Guide Star Availability at High Galactic Latitudes

  • Virtual FGS FOV scanned over ~170 deg2 of GSC-II at |b|  45

  • # stars / FGS FOV: min = 0, max = 12, mean = 2.7, median = 3

  • FGS has two FOVs


2mass guide star availability at low galactic latitudes

2MASS Guide Star Availability at Low Galactic Latitudes

  • Virtual FGS FOV scanned over ~103 deg2 of 2MASSat |b|  30

  • # stars / FGS FOV: min = 0, max = 377, mean = 28.2, median = 15(preliminary results)

  • FGS has two FOVs


Mitigating guide star failures

Mitigating Guide Star Failures

  • Allowing up to 3 candidate guide stars improves success rate

  • Including non-stars as reference objects enhances the probability of success

  • Candidate guide stars with I-band photometry should be chosen preferentially over those lacking I-band photometry

  • Flight software ID algorithm should be tested against realistic conditions

  • Most JWST GSC-II work to date focused on high galactic latitude fields. Availability and selection of guide stars in other areas needs to be studied:

    • in the disk of the galaxy (2MASS; underway)

    • optically opaque star forming regions

    • crowded fields

    • near bright (V<6) stars that may be targets for coronagraphy


Relevant reports

Relevant Reports

  • The Areal Density of the 2MASS Catalog at Low Galactic LatitudesHolfeltz, Nelan, Chayer 2009, in progress

  • Comparison of GSC2.3 and UKIDSS LAS at High Galactic LatitudesJWST-STScI-001668, SM-12Holfeltz, Chayer, Nelan 2009, in review

  • Characterizing Non-Stars in GSC2.3JWST-STScI-001641, SM-12Holfeltz, Chayer, Nelan 2009, in review

  • The Distribution of Stars in GSC2.3 at High Galactic Latitudes, Part 1Holfeltz, Chayer, Nelan, 2009

  • Algorithms for Transforming GSC-II Magnitudes into the NIRJWST-STScI-001410 Chayer, Nelan, 2008


  • Login