1 / 22

County of Onondaga GASB Valuation Presentation Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs)

County of Onondaga GASB Valuation Presentation Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs). December 5 , 2007. Discussion Agenda. What are Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs)? New Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statements on Accounting for OPEBs Valuation results

isanne
Download Presentation

County of Onondaga GASB Valuation Presentation Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. County of OnondagaGASB Valuation PresentationOther Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs) December 5 , 2007

  2. Discussion Agenda • What are Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs)? • New Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statements on Accounting for OPEBs • Valuation results • Key Assumptions overview • Redesign and cost savings discussion

  3. Other Post Employment Benefits • What are Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs)? • Healthcare Benefits • Medical • Dental • Rx • Vision • Other Benefits – if not part of pension plan • Life Insurance • Disability • Group Legal • Long-Term Care • Post Employment relates to any time period when an individual is not actively employed, and usually means retired.

  4. Other Post Employment Benefits • What are not Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs)? • Vacation • Sick Leave • Sabbaticals • Accrued Sick Days (Statement 16) • COBRA • Special termination benefits

  5. Onondaga OPEB Plans • Onondaga Retiree Healthcare • Healthcare Plans required to be valued under GASB accounting rules due to subsidization by the County: • Medical for retirees • Prescription Drug for retirees • Survivor Benefits • Other benefits when paid in full by retirees do not generate GASB liability • No implicit subsidy of these benefits

  6. Overview of Accounting Rules • Why is GASB implementing a new accounting standard? • Current accounting standards fail to recognize the cost of OPEB when employee services are rendered • Current accounting standards do not identify the value of OPEB already “earned” or accrued as a result of employees’ past service • Current accounting rules recognize only “pay as you go” cost • New Standard creates no obligation to fund the benefits according to the expense measure

  7. Overview of Accounting Rules • Recognize the cost of benefits in periods when the related services (i.e. active employment) are received by the employer • Provide information about the actuarial accrued liabilities associated with past service • Whether and to what extent these benefits have been funded • Provide information useful in assessing potential demands on the employer’s future cash flows

  8. Overview of Accounting Rules • OPEB standards are structured like GASB’s Pension accounting & reporting standards • GASB 25 – Plan’s accounting • GASB 27 – Employer’s accounting • Key financial statement components • Annual OPEB Cost (annual expense) (AOC) • Annual Required Contribution (ARC) • Net OPEB Obligation (balance sheet liability) (NOO) • Actuarial Liability and Funded Status (disclosure notes) (UAAL) • Advance funding is not required, but if the ARC is fully funded • The Net OPEB Obligation will be close to zero • A potentially more favorable discount rate, depending on investment strategy, can be used to value the plan • A more favorable discount rate results in a lower ARC

  9. GASB Valuation for Onondaga • GASB 45 – for the Employer, for FYE 2006 • Valuation results were compiled for GASB 45 • Valuation is one year ahead of mandatory adoption • GASB 45 Effective Dates(follow GASB 34) Annual RevenueEffective for PY > Phase I >$100m 12/15/2006 Phase II >$10m & <$100m 12/15/2007 Phase III <$10m 12/15/2008

  10. GASB Results

  11. GASB Results Annual OPEB Cost: (Amortization increases at 3.83% per year)

  12. GASB Results Projected Unfunded Year End Net OPEB Obligation: ($ in millions) County Responsibility Beginning Net OPEB Obligation (NOO) $0.0 Annual OPEB Cost (AOC) $51.6 Expected Sponsor Contributions $16.4 Expected December 31, 2006 Net OPEB Obligation (NOO) $35.2 * Expected Sponsor Contributions are benefit payments and RDS payments

  13. Demographic Information • The valuation is based on a census as of January 1, 2006 that was provided by the County. • The following tables summarize active and retiree demographic information.

  14. Assumptions - Eligibility • In general, eligibility conforms to the eligibility to receive a retirement benefit from the corresponding pension plan for the participant • Need not commence pension immediately to receive retiree medical from County • Attainment of age 55 and 5 years of service • 25 years of service and no minimum age with retirement plan code 89k • 20 years of service and no minimum age with retirement plan code 89B or 552

  15. Assumptions – Economic • Discount Rate • Discount rate based on returns on assets used to pay benefits • Unfunded plans generate greater liabilities than identical funded plans • Unfunded discount rate must be consistent with short term returns – 4.25% assumed

  16. Summary of OPEB remarks • OPEB standards are structured like GASB’s Pension accounting & reporting standards • GASB 25 – Plan’s accounting • GASB 27 – Employer’s accounting • Advance funding is not required, pay as you go methods can be maintained • Adoption by the County is necessary for FYE 2007 • Annual OPEB Cost (annual expense) • Net OPEB Obligation (balance sheet liability) • Actuarial Liability and Funded Status (disclosure notes)

  17. Retiree Medical Redesign Parameters • Eligibility – who gets the benefit • Financial Commitment – how much is the cost to the plan sponsor • Benefit Delivery – what benefit levels are covered by the subsidy

  18. Eligibility Changes • Turning the financial commitment “off” for some groups of individuals • Usually new hires are an easy target • Younger groups (e.g. younger than 40) • Requiring more service, or an older age to commence benefits • For example, 60 versus 55 • Can require different retirement definition than the corresponding pension plan • Hybrid approach – linking financial commitment to service, usually by a formula

  19. Typical Company Financial Approaches • Defined Benefit variations • Frozen/Grandfathered Plan • Points System/Age & Service based premium sharing • Various Coordination Strategies • Financial Design Alternatives • “No Plan” Alternatives • Access Only Plan • HSAs while active • HRAs while active • 401(k) increase • Other Pension trading

  20. Retiree Medical Financial Models More Defined Benefit Defined Dollar Benefit Aggregate Account Employer Risk and Responsibility True Defined Contribution Risk + Responsibility Access Only / No Plan OPEB Vals Stops Here More Retiree Risk and Responsibility

  21. Retiree Benefits Delivery Alternatives • Employer-sponsored plan (current arrangement) • Plan designed by employer • Plan often mirrors active benefits • Administered by employer and TPA/insurer • Reducing level of benefits a common occurrence in private sector • Virtually every year, small changes • Infrequently, significant changes • Medicare Advantage is being investigated by many public sector employers as a cost savings mechanism with little cost shift

  22. Retiree Benefits Delivery Alternatives • Group Medicare Advantage • Plan replaces both Medicare Parts A + B and current retiree plan • Employer negotiates with insurance carriers to offer coverage • Plan can be customized; e.g., to mirror active plan • Rates based on group’s characteristics • Private Fee For Service garnering significant attention • Not a network-style plan • May reproduce existing plan design at lower cost

More Related