1 / 16

5 th meeting of INTOSAI Knowledge Sharing Steering Committee New Delhi, 16 and 17 September 2013

5 th meeting of INTOSAI Knowledge Sharing Steering Committee New Delhi, 16 and 17 September 2013 Progress report of INTOSAI Working Group Accountability for and Audit of Disaster-related Aid WG AADA. Gijs de Vries Chairman WG AADA, Member, European Court of Auditors.

isaiah-myers
Download Presentation

5 th meeting of INTOSAI Knowledge Sharing Steering Committee New Delhi, 16 and 17 September 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 5th meeting of INTOSAI Knowledge Sharing Steering Committee New Delhi, 16 and 17 September 2013 Progress report of INTOSAI Working Group Accountability for and Audit of Disaster-relatedAidWG AADA Gijs de Vries Chairman WG AADA, Member, European Court of Auditors

  2. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • 2007 Mexico INCOSAI createdWorking Group – 23 members • Solution to observedinadequacy of transparency and accountability arrangements • Guidance and good practice for SAIsauditingdisaster-relatedaid • 2010 South AfricaINCOSAI encouragedWorking Group to broaden the IFAF to cover all of humanitarianaid and to finalise the guidance and good practice • Present output to 2013 China INCOSAI: • INTOSAI GOV 9250 on the IFAF • 5500 series - 5 ISSAIs on auditingdisaster-relatedaid

  3. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • Since last KSC meeting: • October 2012: 5 ISSAIspublished as exposuredrafts • January 2013: ISSAIsmodified to takeaccount of commentsreceivedfromseveralSAIs but alsomany international organisations such as UN organisations (UN OCHA, UNDP, UNODC), World Bank, OECD, GHD, European Commission and NGOs • January 2013: INTOSAI GOV 9250 on IFAF published as exposuredraft

  4. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • April 2013: INTOSAI GOV modified to takeaccount of 30 sets of commentsfrom international organisations - UNDP, UNISDR, UNOIOS, World Bank, European Commission, RIAS, HAP, IATI, NGOs, manySAIs • May and June 2013: adoption of final versions for endorsement of ISSAIs and GOV by WG AADA • June-Aug 2013: translation of endorsement versions into French, German, Spanish and Arabic

  5. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • July 2013: adoption of endorsement versions of ISSAIs and GOV by KSC and approval of GOV by the PSC Subcommittee on Accounting and Reporting • until Sept 2013: contacts with IDI on how to promote training on the ISSAIs in the 5500 series (training capacity and funding) and agreement to includethis issue in an upcoming IDI survey

  6. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why?

  7. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • Positive feedback on ISSAIs: • ‘…drafts are extremely thorough and will be of great use to supreme audit institutions…’ - United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) • ‘…drafts provide clarity on the auditors’ responsibility to highlight gaps in government disaster policy and action, and this is particularly welcome. Improving government performance in this area could be instrumental in saving lives and reducing economic losses from disaster.’ - OECD Development Assistance Committee • ‘…documents are well written, structured to provide good understanding with many examples from real life, and lists of red flags for reference by SAI auditors…the result of multiple source input, good research and consultation.’ -Transparency International • ‘All 5 guidelines are clear and comprehensive. When implemented these guidelines will help to promote more effective, accountable and transparent aid delivery to affected communities - Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP)

  8. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why?

  9. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • Positive feedback on GOV: • ‘…will be a powerful mechanism to strengthen transparency and accountability.’ - World Bank • ’IFAF is an important tool for enhancing accountability. DG ECHO looks forward to following them and promoting them within its partners’ community’ - European Commission • ‘…recognises the value of IFAF. It provides audited ex-post final open data for a pre-defined financial period using simple, standardised tables.’ – United Nations Office for Internal Oversight Services • ‘…appreciates the time and effort spent to achieve this high quality product…’ – United Nations Development Programme • ‘…invaluable work: IFAF implementation will bring benefits to both donors and recipients of humanitarian aid…’ – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction • ’…applauds the intent to achieve consistency, eliminate duplication and reduce costs.’ – Catholic Relief Services

  10. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • Externalactivity by WG AADA: • Forum on United Nations Convention against Corruption, Chile (chair) • 15th IACC on Fraud and Corruption, Brasilia (chair) • AFROSAI-E Governing Board meeting, Mauritius (chair) • Global Platform Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva (chair & SAI Turkey) • INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing, Tallinn (chair) • Private sector auditors, donors and NGOs (SAI of Chile) • Donors and NGOs (SAI of Netherlands) • United Nations, donors, IATI and NGOs (ECA)

  11. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • Nextsteps • Presentation to Governing Board in China • Final endorsement by INCOSAI in China • Dissolution of Working Group AADA • Publication as ISSAIs and GOV on PSC website • Use of ISSAIs by auditors and for training • Possibly (uponrequest by SAIs) guidance for auditing IFAF tables • Review and update in time for INCOSAI 2019

  12. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? Role of INTOSAI regardingISSAIs

  13. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? Role of INTOSAI regarding GOV

  14. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? • Conclusion of the chairman • New 5500 series of ISSAIs on auditing disaster-related aid • Simple, standardised framework for preparing and making openly available audited, ex-post, financial data on humanitarian aid: IFAF, reflected in INTOSAI GOV 9250 • By using ISSAIs SAIs can raise efficiency and effectiveness of audit work, and help governments to prevent and cope with disasters • Ask XXI INCOSAI to: • Endorse new 5500 series of ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOV 9250, • Take note of Final Report of the Working Group, and • Disband the Working Group AADA

  15. Costs of floods Pakistan 2010 • $ 3 billion in relief/recovery • $ 10 billion in damages "Had we spent only $40 million in making sure our flood infrastructures are maintained, these losses would've been reduced to one-tenth. We would have been able to save a lot of lives, properties, and the trauma the affected population went through.” Chairman Pakistan National Disaster Management Agency “Every dollar spent on preparing for disasters saves around seven dollars in economic losses.” UNDP, 2012 An ounce of prevention…

  16. INTOSAI Working Group AADA – Why? More information on the Working Group availableat: http://eca.europa.eu/intosai-aada

More Related