1 / 24

Are Drug Pricing Formulas Full Employment Acts For State Attorney Generals?

Are Drug Pricing Formulas Full Employment Acts For State Attorney Generals?. Gerard Anderson PhD Professor Johns Hopkins University. Lake Wobegon Syndrome : How Can Everyone Be Getting A Better Deal?. U.S. vs. Other Countries Medicaid vs. Other Payors Maryland vs. California

ingrid
Download Presentation

Are Drug Pricing Formulas Full Employment Acts For State Attorney Generals?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Are Drug Pricing Formulas Full Employment Acts For State Attorney Generals? Gerard Anderson PhD Professor Johns Hopkins University

  2. Lake Wobegon Syndrome : How Can Everyone Be Getting A Better Deal? • U.S. vs. Other Countries • Medicaid vs. Other Payors • Maryland vs. California • Maryland Medicaid vs. Maryland Prisons

  3. Economics 101 – Fixed vs. Variable Costs • Fixed Costs • costs that must be incurred regardless of number of units sold • Variable Costs • costs of producing one additional unit • Examples • Fixed - plant and equipment or R & D • Variable - materials

  4. Fixed Costs Decline As Number of Units Increase

  5. Variable Costs First Decrease and Then Increase

  6. Standard Economic Theory – Price Determined By Where Variable Cost is Lowest - Fixed Costs are Irrelevant Firms Produce Where Variable Cost is Lowest

  7. In Reality –Fixed Costs Matter Pharmaceutical companies could not exist if everyone only paid only the variable cost

  8. Most Pharmaceutical Spending Involves Fixed Costs • Marketing: 32.8% • Costs of Goods Sold: 25.3% • Profit: 20.6% • R & D: 14% • Taxes: 7.3%

  9. $64,000 Policy Question • Who should pay the fixed costs of pharmaceutical companies? • U.S. vs. other counties • Medicaid vs. other payors • Maryland vs. California • Maryland Medicaid vs. Maryland Prisons

  10. Who Is Paying The Fixed Costs? • U.S. pays twice as much as other countries • Almost 2 to 1 difference in government payors: • Medicare • 340 B • Medicaid • VA • DoD • Some states pay 3 times what other states pay • Significant variation within state programs

  11. Policy Issue – Spillover Effects • If payor (e.g. Medicaid) gets a lower price then will other payors have to make up the difference? • One economic assumption: • Pharmaceutical companies will be able to raise prices to other payors (programs) to cover their fixed costs • Alternative economic assumption: • Each payor (program) negotiates the best price independently of what other payors (programs) pay

  12. My Perspective On Spillover Effects • Each pharmaceutical executive will want to maximize the revenue from each payor (program) • Result is that states need an economic not just a legal rationale for getting low drug prices

  13. Full Employment for Attorney Generals • Without an economic rationale companies will try to maximize revenue in Medicaid by “gaming” the system

  14. Unlike Most Goods and Services the Consumer Is Not King In Pharmaceutical Pricing • Physicians must prescribe drugs • Hospitals, nursing homes, HHAs use formularies • Pharmacies can push drugs that earn them greater profits • Patients pay small portion of bill out-of-pocket

  15. Medicaid is NOT the Entity Purchasing Prescription Drugs

  16. Remember the Spread • Spread is the difference between pharmacy (hospital, LTC, HHA) purchase price and what Medicaid believes is the purchase price • In 2002 CBO calculated that pharmacies earned the following spreads in Medicaid • 23% overall • 30% generics • 14% brand names

  17. What Are The Economic Incentives? • Drug companies want pharmacies to earn the most money on their drugs so they will prescribe them • Pharmacies will want to prescribe drugs that earn them the most money • Both drug companies and pharmacies benefit when the spread is greater • Medicaid loses when the spread is larger

  18. Trust Me I Am From Pharma • The source of all the pricing data is the pharmaceutical companies • AWP, AMP, ASP, EAC, FUL, MAC, WAC

  19. AMP and Best Price • Average Manufacturers Price (AMP) is supposedly what a drug company receives for a drug in a given quarter from retail pharmacies • Best price is supposedly the lowest price in retail pharmacies • Medicaid rebates are determined based on difference • How can any state validate either best or AMP?

  20. Auditing • CMS investigated pharmaceutical company reported data on only 4 occasions over a 10 year period according to GAO

  21. Lake Wobegon • Rebates are difficult to monitor when the pharmaceutical industry has all the data • Not every state can be getting the best deal • Some states pay almost 5 times more for the same drug

  22. Price Transparency • Find out the actual prices other payors are paying for the same drugs • U.S. vs. Other Countries • Medicaid vs. Other Payors • Maryland vs. California • Maryland Medicaid vs. Maryland Prisons

  23. Comparative Data Allows A Bully Pulpit • With comparative price data states can see where they are getting a good deal and when they are paying higher prices • Must be done on a drug by drug basis • States can then focus their negotiations on the prices of drugs where they pay much higher prices

  24. Conclusion • Who is going to pay the fixed costs of the pharmaceutical industry? • Gaming will occur without an economic rationale for discounts and rebates • Cannot rely on pharmaceutical companies for all the data to determine prices • Price transparency will tell states when they are getting a good deal

More Related