Assessing the Impacts of Changes in the Information Technology R&D Ecosystem Retaining Leadership in an Increasingly Global Environment. Computing Leadership Summit Washington, DC 23 February 2009. Charge.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
ERIC BENHAMOU, Benhamou Global Ventures, Co-Chair
RANDY H. KATZ, University of California, Berkeley, Co-Chair
STEPHEN R. BARLEY, Stanford University
ANDREW B. HARGADON, University of California, Davis
MARTIN KENNEY, University of California, Davis
STEVEN KLEPPER, Carnegie Mellon University
EDWARD D. LAZOWSKA, University of Washington
LENNY MENDONCA, McKinsey & Company
DAVID C. NAGEL, Ascona Group
ARATI PRABHAKAR, U.S. Venture Partners
RAJ REDDY, Carnegie Mellon University
LUCINDA SANDERS, National Center for Women and Information Technology
1. DEFINING THE IT R&D ECOSYSTEM
2. IT: THE ESSENTIAL ENABLER FOR THE INFORMATION SOCIETY
3. THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF THE U.S. IT R&D ECOSYSTEM: 1995-2007
4. A GLOBALIZED, DYNAMIC IT R&D ECOSYSTEM
5. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
“An economic community supported by a foundation of interacting organizations and individuals—the organisms of the business world. This economic community produces goods and services of value to customers, who are themselves members of the ecosystem”
(Imagine a day without IT…)
“Interestingly, during the preparation of the [tiretracks figure] in 1994, members of the authoring committee were discouraged because they could not identify current research advances that were likely to lead to new billion-dollar industries. Eight years later, when the second version of the figure was being prepared, more than half a dozen such industries had emerged, which demonstrates that predicting the future in a field as dynamic as information technology is incredibly difficult, even for experts.”
1. Strengthen the Effectiveness and Impact of Federally Funded IT Research
2. Remain the Strongest Generator of and Magnet for Technical Talent
3. Reduce Friction That Harms the Effectiveness of the U.S. IT R&D Ecosystem
4. Ensure that the United States Has the Infrastructure That Enables U.S. IT Users and Innovators to Lead the World
Finding 1.1. A robust program of federally sponsored research and development (R&D) in IT is vital to the nation.
Finding 1.2. The level of federal investment in fundamental research in IT continues to be inadequate.
Recommendation 1.1. As Federal govt increases fed investment in long-term basic research in the physical sciences, engineering, mathematics, and information sciences, it should carefully assess the level of investment in IT R&D, mindful of the economic return, societal impact, enablement of discovery across science and engineering, and other benefits of additional effort in IT, and should ensure that appropriate advisory mechanisms are in place to guide investment within the IT R&D portfolio.
Finding 2.1. Rebuilding the computing education pipeline at all levels requires overcoming numerous obstacles, which in turn portends significant challenges for the development of future U.S. IT workforce talent.
Finding 2.2. The participation in IT of women, people with disabilities, and certain minorities, including African-Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans, is especially low and declining. This low level of participation will affect the United States’ ability to meet its workforce needs and place it at a competitive disadvantage by not allowing it to capitalize on the innovative thinking of half of its population.
Recommendation 2.1. To build the skilled workforce that it will need to retain high-value IT industries, the United States should invest more in education and outreach initiatives to nurture and grow its IT talent pool.
Finding 2.3. Although some IT professional jobs will be offshored, there are more IT jobs in the United States than at any time during the dot-com boom, even in the face of corporate offshoring trends.
Recommendation 2.2. The United States should increase the availability and facilitate the issuance of work and residency visas to foreign students who graduate with advanced IT degrees from U.S. educational institutions.
Finding 3.1. Fewer young, innovative IT companies are gaining access to U.S. public equity markets.
Recommendation 3.1. Congress and Federal agencies, e.g., SEC and PTO, should consider the impact of both current and proposed policies and regulations on the IT ecosystem—and especially on young, innovative IT businesses—and consider measures to mitigate these where appropriate.
Finding 4.1. Most dynamic IT sector likely to be in the countries with the most demanding IT customers and consumers.
Finding 4.2. In terms of nationwide availability, use, and speed of broadband, U.S.—the inventor of broadband technology—has been losing ground compared with other nations.
Recommendation 4.1. U.S. should establish an ambitious target for regaining and holding a decisive lead in the broad deployment of affordable, gigabit broadband services. Federal and state regulators should explore models and approaches that reduce regulatory and jurisdictional bottlenecks and should increase incentives for investment in these services.
Recommendation 4.2. Government (federal, state, and local) should foster commercial innovation and itself make strategic investments in IT R&D and deployment so that the United States can retain a global lead position in areas where it has particular mission requirements.
Questions? IT R&D Ecosystem