1 / 44

Recent results on measurements and interpretation of CMB fluctuations

Recent results on measurements and interpretation of CMB fluctuations. A. Doroshkevich Astro Space Center of the Physical Institute RAS Moscow, Russia. List of the problems. Observations of the CMB Separation of the CMB and galactic foregrounds Power spectrum of the CMB

ince
Download Presentation

Recent results on measurements and interpretation of CMB fluctuations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent results on measurementsand interpretation of CMB fluctuations A. Doroshkevich Astro Space Center of the Physical Institute RAS Moscow, Russia

  2. List of the problems • Observations of the CMB • Separation of the CMB and galactic foregrounds • Power spectrum of the CMB • Polarizations of the CMB • Standard cosmological model • Anomalies of the WMAP results • Extensions and limitations of the • cosmological models

  3. OBSERVATIONS WMAP 23,30, 40, 60, 90 GHz, 1<l<950 ATACAMA 148,218, 277 GHz, 6m, 600<l<8000 BICEP 100, 150, 220 GHz, 21<l<335 QUaD 100, 150 GHz, 2.6m, 200<l<2000 SPT 95, 150, 220 GHz,2000<l<9500

  4. WMAP observationsν= 22.8, 33.0, 40.7, 60.8, 93.5 GHzλ= 1.3, 0.9, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3 cmθ~20’, ΔT~3-5 10-6 K

  5. Separation of the CMB and galactic foreground Incorrect problem (2 ↔ 3): ILC approach Observed signal S(θi) is superposition of the CMB signal C(θi)and Galactic foreground F(θi) • S1(θi)=C(θi)+F1(θi), S2(θi)=C(θi)+F2(θi), • For the homogeneous sample of pixels (ILC) • C(θi)=α S1(θi)+(1-α) S2(θi)=C+F2+α(F1–F2) • α=-<Q2Q12>/<Q122> • Q1 =S1-<S1>, Q2 =S2-<S2>, Q12 =Q1-Q2 • <Q1> =0, <Q2>=0, <Q12>=0

  6. Decompositionof temperature – power spectrum here Φlm and alm are the phase and amplitude of fluctuations. Power spectrum of fluctuations is The shape of the power spectrum is well known for many cosmological models

  7. transformed Planck Planck satellite and transformed Planck have the same power spectrum (same|dk|), they have different “faces” due to different phases: It is phase Fk that keep Max’s face, not amplitude |dk| !! Planck satellite Max Planck |dk| exp(iFk) |dk| exp(iFk) |dk| exp(iFk) FT-1[ ]

  8. WMAP-7 power spectrum

  9. WMAP-ACBAR – QUAD power spectrum

  10. ATACAMA power spectrum

  11. POLARIZATION • Compton scatter of CMB (E-mode) • 2<l<20 – reionization, (z~10) • l>20 – recombination, (z~1000) On the scalar modes l>2 (E-modes) • and vortex and tensor modes (B modes)

  12. WMAP-7

  13. Polarization around the temperature cold spot(simulation,observationV+Wand noiseV+/-W)

  14. Polarization aroundthe temperature hot spot(simulations,observationsV+Wand noiseV+/-W)

  15. BICEP-2010, (low l<300)

  16. QUAD (l>300)

  17. QUAD

  18. Parameters of the cosmological model

  19. Main results of the WMAP • 1. Complex reconstruction of the cosmological • model • Six parameters fit • In contrast with SN1 • Comparison with the Planck mission – • Tensor – scalar , r, ratio and • the redshift of reionization zreio • Multi parametric fits

  20. Problems of this high precision separation: anomalies • 1. Quadrupole ΔT2=249μK2 • instead of the expected ΔT2=1250μK2 • 2. Axis of evil - common alignment of • quadrupole and octupole • 3. Asymmetry between north and south • hemispheres • 4. System of deep walls

  21. Possible explanations • Small quadrupole and cold spots can be • explained with the anisotropic cosmology • The axis of evil and north – south asymmetry • can point out the unknown noise. • Bennett et al., 2011, ApJS,192,17B: • all anomalies are random effects • Doroshkevich, Verkhodanov, 2011, PhRvD, 83,043002: • The first three anomalies are caused by • bad separation between the CMB and foregrounds

  22. Separation between the CMB and foreground - ILC approaches • The CMB map itself is interesting for purposes: • Homogeneity and isotropy of the Universe – • anisotropic cosmological models • Possible signatures of non-trivial topology • and mirror symmetry. • Correlations of the CMB with other emissions • Signatures of non Gaussianity of the CMB • Discussion in Delabrouille et al. arXiv:0807.0773 • Our corrections of the ILC approach: • It is unstable – discret instability

  23. Correction of the power spectra

  24. Bulk Flows KSZ - WMAP 263 – 48; (Kashlinsky & Atrio 2009) Galactic rotation (z<0.04) 52 – 68 (Longo 2011) CMB Quadrupole WMAP-7 283 – 65; 360 – 63; 15 – 26; ΔT22= 249μK2 CMB Quadrupole DV-11 285 – 9; 13 - 170; 60 – 77; ΔT22=1070μK2 Anisotropic cosmology(Perivolaropoulos arXiv:1104.0539)

  25. Anisotropic cosmology (9 Bianchi models) • Anisotropy of cosmological expansion only • Anisotropy of the curvature of the Universe • Homogeneous magnetic field • Matter rotation • All four causes lead to quadrupole anisotropy • We can measure the combine effect only in a framework of anisotropic cosmological model • These effects are relatively small – • Demianski, Doroshkevich, 2007,PhRvD, 75, 123517

  26. Small scale fluctuations - SZ effect KSZ as the standard candle

  27. South Pole observations

  28. The end The end

  29. WMAP

  30. BICEP

  31. Parameters of the cosmological model

  32. QUAD 100 & 150 GHz

  33. WMAP Model 4ΔT22=249μK2 , ΔT22=1070μK2

  34. WMAP-7

  35. ILC separation for two channels • S1(θi)=C(θi)+F1(θi), S2(θi)=C(θi)+F2(θi), • For the homogeneous sample • C(θi)=α S1(θi)+(1-α) S2(θi), • α=-<Q2Q12>/<Q122> • Q1 =S1-<S1>, Q2 =S2-<S2>, Q12 =Q1-Q2 • <Q1> =0, <Q2>=0, <Q12>=0 • At the same timethe precise solution is • αf(<F2>-<F1>)= <F2>, αf=<F2>/(<F2>-<F1>)=α • What is the homogeneous sample??? >

  36. TSZ – KSZ theory

  37. SPT – SZ & DSFG

  38. BULK FLOW of CLUSTERS • Method – KSZ from WMAP (l, b)D=263, 48

  39. ACBAR

  40. QUAD

More Related