1 / 38

Corporate Strategy: Acquisitions, Alliances, and Networks

Corporate Strategy: Acquisitions, Alliances, and Networks. Part 2 Strategy Formulation. LO 9-1 Differentiate between mergers and acquisitions, and explain why firms would use either as a vehicle for corporate strategy.

Download Presentation

Corporate Strategy: Acquisitions, Alliances, and Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Corporate Strategy: Acquisitions, Alliances, and Networks

  2. Part 2 Strategy Formulation

  3. LO 9-1Differentiate between mergers and acquisitions, and explain why firms would use either as a vehicle for corporate strategy. LO 9-2Define horizontal integration and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this corporate level strategy. LO 9-3 Evaluate whether mergers and acquisitions lead to competitive advantage. LO 9-4 Define strategic alliances, and explain why they are important corporate strategy vehicles and why firms enter into them. LO 9-5 Describe three alliance governance mechanisms and evaluate their pros and cons. LO 9-6 Describe the three phases of alliance management, and explain how an alliance management capability can lead to a competitive advantage. LO 9-7 Define strategic networks and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different network positions.

  4. Facebook: From Dorm Room to Dominant Social Network Chapter Case 9 • Facebook: “most powerful and transformative social change” • Started by Mark Zuckerberg in 2004 • Overcame the first-mover advantage held by MySpace • True global strategy: more users first, profits later • Adding different functions to go after a wide range of users • Innovative network marketing approach • Word of mouth through online social network • Frequently attacked for insufficient protection of users’ privacy • Needs a sustainable business model • Implications for alliances and networks

  5. Global Users of Facebook and MySpace EXHIBIT 9.1 Facebook passes MySpace on number of users in 2008 and continues exponential growth

  6. Integrating Companies: Mergers and Acquisitions • Merger: combining two companies • Friendly approach • Ex: Disney & Pixar • Generally similar in size • Acquisition: purchase or takeover a company • Can be friendly or unfriendly • Hostile takeover • Ex: Vodafone buys Mannesmann Dell Makeover Video

  7. Horizontal Integration: Merging with Competitors Horizontal integration: process of merging and acquiring competitors HP buys Compaq in 2002 Pfizer buys Wyeth in 2009 Live Nation buys Ticketmaster in 2010 Benefits: Reduce competitive intensity Lower costs Boost differentiation Access to new markets and distribution channels

  8. Source of Value Creation and Costs in Horizontal Integration EXHIBIT 9.2 Benefits Drawbacks

  9. Reduction in Competitive Intensity Changes underlying industry structure Taking out excessive capacity from rivals Increased industry consolidation Example: U.S. airlines in recent years Increasing bargaining power vis-à-vis suppliers and buyers Stable industry and more profits Usually need government’s approval Example: FTC rejected Office Depot & Staples merger

  10. Horizontal Integration: Lower Costs How? Through economies of scale Enhancing economic value creation Crucial to the industries with high fixed costs Example: pharmaceutical industry Large sales force = fixed cost Need $1billion in drug revenues to cover these costs

  11. STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 9.1 Food Fight: Kraft Hostile Takeover of Cadbury • Kraft acquired Cadbury in UK • Hostile takeover, $20 billion deal • Cadbury has strong position in emerging economies • Perfected distribution system in countries like India • Kraft faces strong rivalries worldwide, including China • The acquisition forces Hershey and other competitors to rethink their strategies • Hershey 90% revenues from U.S. market 1–11

  12. Horizontal Integration Increased differentiation Strengthen competitive positions Differentiation of products and services Example: Oracle buys PeopleSoft ($10B in 2005) Joined enterprise software with HR management software Access to new markets and distribution channel Enter new markets by M&A Ex: Kraft buys Cadbury New distribution in emerging markets & domestically

  13. LO 9-1Differentiate between mergers and acquisitions, and explain why firms would use either as a vehicle for corporate strategy. LO 9-2 Define horizontal integration and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this corporate level strategy. LO 9-3Evaluate whether mergers and acquisitions lead to competitive advantage. LO 9-4 Define strategic alliances, and explain why they are important corporate strategy vehicles and why firms enter into them. LO 9-5 Describe three alliance governance mechanisms and evaluate their pros and cons. LO 9-6 Describe the three phases of alliance management, and explain how an alliance management capability can lead to a competitive advantage. LO 9-7 Define strategic networks and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different network positions.

  14. Mergers and Acquisitions Many M&As actually destroy shareholder value! When there is value, it often goes to the acquiree Acquirers tend to pay a premium Why still desire M&As? Overcome competitive disadvantage Superior acquisition and integration capability Principal–agent problems

  15. Value Destruction in M&A: The Worst Offenders EXHIBIT 9.3 Shareholder value destroyed based on up to 3 years post-merger analysis compared to overall stock market

  16. Desire to Overcome Competitive Disadvantage Adidas acquired Reebok in 2006 Benefits from economies of scale and scope Compete more effectively with #1 Nike Superior Acquisition and Integration Capability Some firms have superior M&A abilities They identify, acquire, and integrate target companies Example: Cisco Systems Sought complementary assets Bought over 130 firms since 2001, including large firms: Linksys, Scientific Atlanta, & WebEx Mergers and Acquisitions

  17. Mergers and Acquisitions • Principal–agent problems • Managers have incentives to diversify through M&As to receive more prestige, power, and pay. • Not for shareholder value appreciation • This is principal—agent problem • Managerial hubris • Self-delusion • Beliefs in their own capability despite evidence to the contrary • “Exception to the rule” • Example: Quaker Oats purchase of Snapple • Sony purchase of Columbia Pictures

  18. LO 9-1 Differentiate between mergers and acquisitions, and explain why firms would use either as a vehicle for corporate strategy. LO 9-2 Define horizontal integration and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this corporate level strategy. LO 9-3 Evaluate whether mergers and acquisitions lead to competitive advantage. LO 9-4Define strategic alliances, and explain why they are important corporate strategy vehicles and why firms enter into them. LO 9-5Describe three alliance governance mechanisms and evaluate their pros and cons. LO 9-6 Describe the three phases of alliance management, and explain how an alliance management capability can lead to a competitive advantage. LO 9-7 Define strategic networks and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different network positions.

  19. Strategic Alliances: Causes and Consequences of Partnering Strategic alliances: voluntary arrangements between firms Sharing knowledge, resources, and capabilities Leading to gaining and sustaining competitive advantage Relational view of competitive advantage VRI resources are embedded in alliances (VRIO framework from Chapter 4) HP’s alliance with DreamWorks SKG Resulted in Halo Collaboration conferencing

  20. Number of R&D Alliances EXHIBIT 9.4 Explosive growth since the 1980s yields faster products at lower costs and aids globalization.

  21. Strategic Alliances to Challenge Amazon STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 9.2 • Amazon’s Kindle • E-reader selling content below cost • Content providers do not want fixed price for e-books ($9.99) • Similar strategy Amazon used for printed books earlier • Apple’s iPad • Allied with major publishers • Let publishers set the prices directly • Apple worked with publishers to increase the bargaining power over customers 1–21

  22. Why Do Firms Enter Strategic Alliances? Strengthen competitive position Apple vs. Amazon Enter new markets Local partner for global growth Microsoft partners with Yahoo on search Hedge against uncertainty Real options approach Roche invests in Genentech 1990 & buys it in 2009 Access critical complementary assets Pixar partners with Disney Learn new capabilities GM & Toyota (NUMMI) – formed in1984

  23. STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 9.3 Pixar and Disney: From Alliance to Acquisition • Pixar and Disney • Early strategic alliance • Successful products: Toy Story, Monsters, Inc., Finding Nemo, etc. • In 2005, Disney acquired Pixar for $7.4 billion • Steve Jobs became the largest shareholder of Disney • Early alliance serves as a vehicle to match two parties’ complementary assets and eventually led to the acquisition • Disney later acquired Marvel Entertainment, which made Spiderman, Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk…etc. Pixar Video 1–23

  24. Governing Strategic Alliances Governing mechanisms: Contractual agreements for non-equity alliances Based on contracts Equity alliances One firm takes partial ownership in the other Joint ventures Stand-alone organization owned by 2 or more firms

  25. Non-Equity Alliances Most common forms of contracts Supply agreements Distribution agreements Licensing agreements Vertical strategic alliances Firms tend to share explicit knowledge that are codified Licensing agreements, partners exchange codified knowledge regularly Ex: Genentech & Eli Lilly Genentech R&D focused Eli Lilly manufacturing & FDA approvals

  26. Equity Alliances At least one partner takes partial ownership position Stronger commitment toward the relationship Allow the sharing of tacit knowledge Tacit knowledge concerns the “know how” Partners exchange personnel to acquire tacit knowledge 1984 Toyota + GM = NUMMI (New United Motor Manufacturing Inc.) 2010 Toyota + Tesla to use the NUMMI plant Corporate venture capital is another equity source Established firms invest in new startups Tends to produce stronger ties and greater trust

  27. Joint Ventures Created and owned by two or more companies Hulu owned by NBC, ABC, and Fox Long-term commitment Exchange both tacit and explicit knowledge Frequent interaction of personnel Stepping stone toward full integration of the partnership “Try before you buy” concept Used to enter foreign markets

  28. Key Characteristics of Different Alliance Types EXHIBIT 9.5

  29. LO 9-1 Differentiate between mergers and acquisitions, and explain why firms would use either as a vehicle for corporate strategy. LO 9-2 Define horizontal integration and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this corporate level strategy. LO 9-3 Evaluate whether mergers and acquisitions lead to competitive advantage. LO 9-4 Define strategic alliances, and explain why they are important corporate strategy vehicles and why firms enter into them. LO 9-5 Describe three alliance governance mechanisms and evaluate their pros and cons. LO 9-6Describe the three phases of alliance management, and explain how an alliance management capability can lead to a competitive advantage. LO 9-7 Define strategic networks and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different network positions.

  30. Alliance Management Capability EXHIBIT 9.6

  31. Alliance Management Capability • Partner selection and alliance formation • Ascertain that expected benefits exceeds costs • Must select the best possible alliance partner • Partner compatibility • Partner commitment • Willingness to share resources & long-term view • Alliance design and governance • Choose and agree upon governance structure • Non-equity contractual agreement • Equity alliances • Joint venture • Inter-organizational trust is critical

  32. Alliance Management Capability Post-formation alliance management To effectively manage the ongoing relationship Tips: Make relationship-specific investments Establish knowledge-sharing routines Build interfirm trust Example: HP’s dense network of alliances vs. DEC Dedicated alliance function Coordinate alliance-related tasks – at corporate level Knowledge base about how to manage alliance Ex: Eli Lilly is a clear leader in alliance management Best to develop a relational capability

  33. How to Make Alliances Work EXHIBIT 9.7

  34. LO 9-1 Differentiate between mergers and acquisitions, and explain why firms would use either as a vehicle for corporate strategy. LO 9-2 Define horizontal integration and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this corporate level strategy. LO 9-3 Evaluate whether mergers and acquisitions lead to competitive advantage. LO 9-4 Define strategic alliances, and explain why they are important corporate strategy vehicles and why firms enter into them. LO 9-5 Describe three alliance governance mechanisms and evaluate their pros and cons. LO 9-6 Describe the three phases of alliance management, and explain how an alliance management capability can lead to a competitive advantage. LO 9-7 Define strategic networks and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different network positions.

  35. Strategic Networks Social structure with multiple organizations Network nodes – the organizations Network ties – the links between organizations Network achieves goals that cannot be done by only one firm Example - Star Alliance 1st global airline network Air Canada, Air China, Continental Airlines, Lufthansa, Singapore Airlines, United Airlines, etc. Seamless travel on 25 international airlines

  36. Analyzing Strategic Networks Enable us to understand the benefits and costs of a network Quality of the tie: strong or weak? Firm’s position in a network Network centrality Knowledge broker Ex: IDEO design consultancy Structural holes Small-world phenomenon Network in local cluster High degree of centrality of each firm

  37. Firms Embedded in Strategic Networks EXHIBIT 9.8 A hypothetical strategic network. Firm B is in a key position - knowledge broker

  38. When Strategic Networks Become Dysfunctional STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 9.4 • Deregulation of EU telecoms, competitive intensity rises • Swedish Telia and Dutch KPN form a JV called Unisource • Unisource became a global strategic network • 25 telecom companies in 11 countries • The flexibility and autonomy of smaller firms in the network has been severely restricted by large partners • Large firms such as AT&T could dominate the network • Members exited the network and it collapsed 1–38

More Related