1 / 9

ISOTROPY STUDY IN OB LIGHT OUTPUT Harold Yepes-Ramirez 05 /12/2011

ISOTROPY STUDY IN OB LIGHT OUTPUT Harold Yepes-Ramirez 05 /12/2011. STRATEGY: In order to find a way to study the isotropy of the OB light output, two kind of configurations in OB runs were studied, extracted from the optical properties runs list: All top LEDs (L4): 58607 58746

idra
Download Presentation

ISOTROPY STUDY IN OB LIGHT OUTPUT Harold Yepes-Ramirez 05 /12/2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ISOTROPY STUDY IN OB LIGHT OUTPUT Harold Yepes-Ramirez 05/12/2011

  2. STRATEGY: • In order to find a way to study the isotropy of the OB light output, two kind of configurations in OB runs were studied, extracted from the optical properties runs list: • All top LEDs (L4): • 58607 • 58746 • All Beacon LEDs (L4): • 58608 • 58745 • Line 4 as emitter line was selected due to be a central line surrounding the most of neighboring lines to it. • Target lines selected: L1, L2, L3, L6, L8, L10.

  3. Special reasoning (by the way)...according to the distance cut for the minimum distance to fit (Rmin), is hits/flashes < 0.1 a very restrictive cut (in terms of the survivor fit points)? In an “All Top” configuration the electronics effects seem to disappear at a distance close to 170±15 m, corresponding to a m (hits/flashes) ≈ 0.3. m < 0.3 is taken to define Rmin used in this analysis. It is translated in more storeys which contribute to the fit.

  4. In an “All Beacon” configuration the electronics effects seem to disappear at a distance close to 200±15 m, corresponding to a m (hits/flashes) ≈ 0.3. m < 0.3 is taken to define Rmin used in this analysis. It is translated in more storeys which contribute to the fit.

  5. ALL TOP RUNS

  6. RUN 58607 RUN 58746

  7. ALL BEACON RUNS

  8. RUN 58608 RUN 58745

  9. CONCLUSIONS: • Isotropy for the OB light output is reached if the “only top” or “all beacon” configuration is set. The results are expected to be compatible with CALIBOB runs. Are we going to perform this kind of runs (we have to increase statistics)? • The more distant lines (L1, L10) get the largest errors in the estimation of L. • In order to recover the runs which are not “only top” or “all beacon”, could it be a good idea to fit to the line with collects more amount of direct photons? It is very important, overall taking into account that we only have a few of Christmas beacon runs.

More Related