Supersites Coordination Workshop
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 26

Brussels - June 11, 2013 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 108 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Supersites Coordination Workshop. Fabrizio Ferrucci, Fausto Guzzetti & the DORIS, EVOSS, LAMPRE and PREFER teams. Long-term sustainability and business issues for volcanoes, landslides, subsidence, and forest fires.

Download Presentation

Brussels - June 11, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Brussels june 11 2013

Supersites Coordination Workshop

Fabrizio Ferrucci, Fausto Guzzetti &

the DORIS, EVOSS, LAMPRE and PREFER teams

Long-term sustainability and business issues for volcanoes, landslides, subsidence, and forest fires.

Hints from the downstream projects DORIS, EVOSS, LAMPRE and PREFER

Brussels - June 11, 2013


Outline

Outline

  • The FP7 collaborative projects stimulate development of downstream GMES services

    • “Downstream” : exploit “Core” services, be self-sustainable, address specific user segments

  • Projects

    • EVOSS 2010-13: volcanoes

    • DORIS 2010-13: landslides

    • PREFER 2012-15: wildfires/forest fires

    • LAMPRE 2013-15: landslides


Evoss

EVOSS

  • EVOSS – European Volcano Observatory Space Services

  • Total cost is € 4.2 M, EC contribution is € 2.8 M

  • Lifetime is from 1 Jan 2010 to 30 Jun 2013

  • where are the costs

  • Development

  • Research

  • Data

  • Service (high-temporal resolution) Service (high-spatial resolution)


Doris

DORIS

  • DORIS – Ground Deformations Risk Scenarios: an Advanced Assessment Service

  • Total cost is € 4.6M, EC contribution is € 3.4M.

  • Lifetime is from 1 Oct 2010 to 30 Sep 2013.

  • where are the costs

  • Development

  • Research

  • Data (high-spatial resolution)

  • Service (with a minimum number of sites within an assigned frame); otherwise 


Details

DETAILS

  • LAMPRE– Landslide modelling and tools for vulnerability assessment preparedness and recovery management

  • Total cost is € 2.5M, EC contribution is € 2.0M

  • Lifetime is from 1 Mar 2013 to 28 Feb 2015


Details1

DETAILS

  • PREFER– space-based information support for prevention and recovery of forest fires emergency in the mediterranean area.

  • Total cost is € 2.8M, EC contribution is € 1.9M

  • Lifetime is from 1 Dec 2012 to 30 Nov 2015

  • where are the costs

  • Development

  • Research

  • Data

  • Service (high-spatial resolution)


Who is the costumer

WHO IS THE COSTUMER?

  • EVOSS

    • Countries, civil protection authorities, Communities who don’t have an observatory but feel/are exposed to volcanic risk.

    • Mandated Institutions, Observatories wanting to improve the extent of monitored parametres , all Institutions “in case of”

    • Airline companies, planning and managing routing, and deciding whether or not to fly across an area where a SIGMET is released by the VAAC


Who is the costumer1

WHO IS THE COSTUMER?

  • DORIS

    • Civil Protection Authorities responsible for landslide and subsidence risk.

    • Environmental agencies dealing with slope processes & ground subsidence phenomena.

  • LAMPRE

    • CPA responsible for landslide risk.

    • EA dealing with slope processes & risk.

    • Transportation agencies & service providers.


Who is the costumer2

WHO IS THE COSTUMER?

  • PREFER

    • Institutions and Entities responsible for the strategic management of land vs. forest fires, and forest fire preparedness


Where is the costumer

WHERE IS THE COSTUMER?

EVOSS

DORIS

LAMPRE

PREFER


What is unique

WHAT IS UNIQUE?

  • EVOSS – satellite real time synoptical monitoring of volcanoes at global scale

  • DORIS– Long term deformation maps and time series & multi-sensors analysis

  • LAMPRE– Accurate event inventory maps & vulnerability assessments

  • PREFER – spacebornehigh-resolution mappingof fire hazard /damage


What is not unique

WHAT IS NOT UNIQUE?

  • EVOSS – SO2 emissions monitoring

  • DORIS– DInSAR maps for ground surface monitoring

  • LAMPRE– Landslide inventory maps & image processing techniques

  • PREFER – a part of image processing techniques, and indexing


The competitive advantage

The competitive advantage

  • Global reach is the undisputed advantage of space borne Remote Sensing.

  • Excluding military demand, the meteorological system is the sole example of need-driven remote-sensing.


Key market drivers

Key market drivers

  • Observation: Everywhere, Anytime

  • Information: Robust, Accessible, Accurate

  • Price: Attractive, Sustainable


Lesson learnt by evoss doris

Lesson learnt by EVOSS & DORIS

  • Extensive marketsurvey and analysis was carried out to address their sustainability.

  • All user communities were involved, in the private and the institutional sectors.

Both in the case of EVOSS and DORIS , an extensive market survey and analysis has been carried out in the last two years in order to address their sustainability.

All the different User communities have been involved, both in the private and institutional sector.

A main outcome is that there is an actual need mainly in the institutional sector, but usually where is the need there are no resources available.

Therefore , the sustainability of operational and validated services such as EVOSS and DORIS must be supported further on by EC institutions


Lesson learnt by evoss doris1

Lesson learnt by EVOSS & DORIS

  • Main need is in the institutional sector, but usually where is the need there resources are not available.

  • Sustainability of operational and validated services such as EVOSS and DORIS should be supported further by the EU.


Roadmap

ROADMAP

  • As the “market” is basically Institutional,

  • what is missing & needed:

    • Institutional support following extensive validation of the results of successful projects


Doris users

DORISUSERS

Main Users

Secondary Users

Civil Protection

Capacity

Extraction Industry

Structural Engineering

Risk Assessment

Government Agencies

Mineral

Builders & Constructors

Developers & home owners

Public Authorities

Oil & Gas

Engineering consultants

Information providers

Regulators

Water

Utility Operators

Insurers

Transport Provides

Environment & Heritage

Industrial Infrastructures

Media


Earth observation market

EARTH OBSERVATION MARKET

  • Main EO markets concerned with landslide risk assessment & hazard mapping:

  • Disaster management (9%)

  • Environmental monitoring (9%)

  • Engineering (22%)

  • Others (60%)

World Share

EO Segments, 2012


Earth observation market1

EARTH OBSERVATION MARKET

  • Main EO markets concerned with landslide risk assessment & hazard mapping:

  • Disaster management (6 M€)

  • Environmental monitoring (6 M€)

  • Engineering (17 M€)

European Market

Relevant EO Segments, 2012


Evoss users

EVOSS USERS

Main

Users

Secondary Users

Key

Stakeholders

VAACs

Aviation

Stakeholders

ICAO

Volcano Observatories

Civil

Protection

EC

Other Users

Industry /

Institutions

Local Authorities

  • Main User communities are:

  • Aviation Industry to support Ash Advisory

  • Volcano Observatories to provide complementary means


Brussels june 11 2013

EVOSS benefits


Swot analyis weaknesses

SWOT ANALYIS | WEAKNESSES

  • Lack of certification in EO industry hampers increase market share [Promotion & dissemination].

  • Lack of benchmark on EO value adding processing & lack of metrics to judge the quality of products [Demonstration & Standards].


Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS

  • Operational costs are man power related rather than EO data costs. The availability of Sentinel free access policy will lower costs.

  • Need to confirmwhether Sentinel data can replace commercially available data (i.e., CSK, TSX).

  • A rigorous quality / achievement assessment of projects to be carried out

  • The EC support and ethical guidance to exploit worldwide the top achievements of best Space projects is welcome


Conclusions1

CONCLUSIONS

  • Consolidation of service requestsis a benefit of DORIS, allowing to divide the costs among users.

  • To be relevant, service shall expand in and outside of Europe.

  • Need to educate users and ensure adoption of services in existing and new processes.


Brussels june 11 2013

Thank you!

[email protected]

[email protected]


  • Login