1 / 32

Brian Fraser Centre for Space Physics, University of Newcastle , Callaghan, NSW , Australia

Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves in the Magnetosphere: Wave and Plasma Properties. Brian Fraser Centre for Space Physics, University of Newcastle , Callaghan, NSW , Australia

iden
Download Presentation

Brian Fraser Centre for Space Physics, University of Newcastle , Callaghan, NSW , Australia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves in the Magnetosphere: Wave and Plasma Properties Brian Fraser Centre for Space Physics, University of Newcastle , Callaghan, NSW, Australia With contributions from: Jerry Goldstein, Tom Immel, Paul Loto’aniu, Nigel Meredith, Mark Moldwin, Howard Singer, Michelle Thomsen

  2. Outline • What is the plasmapause? • EMIC wave propagation – magnetosphere & ionosphere • EMIC waves seen in association with plasma plumes • Plasma-Ring Current conditions associated with EMIC waves occurring in plasmasphere & plume • Wave & plasma Statistics

  3. 1. What is Your Plasmapause? Do all Instruments see the Same Plasmapause? “Cold” plasma measured? OGO-5 H+ DE-1 H+,He+,O+ CRRES e- Cluster e-, ions LANL Ions POLAR e-, ions ULF Waves Ion Mass IMAGE - Plasmasphere/Plumes He+, Heavy Ions in the Plasmasphere Ion Mass Loading DE-1 DE-1 (Horwitz et al., GRL, 1984) (Fraser et al., GRL, 2005)

  4. 2. EMIC Wave Propagation: Dispersion in a 3-ion Cold Plasma Fraser, 1985 ATS-6 Fraser & McPherron 1982

  5. EMIC Wave Propagation Away from the Equator (Perraut et al., JGR, 1984)

  6. Propagation away from a Source Region Within ±110 of the Magnetic Equator CRRES Poynting vector Data N. Hemisphere     S. Hemisphere Loto’aniu et al., 2005

  7. Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves and Plasma Diagnostics in the Magnetosphere EMIC Waves Seen as Pc1-2 Waves at High Latitudes on the Ground

  8. Bouncing Wave Packets - Ground Observations Upper Panel: A superimposed dynamic spectrum of Pc1 EMIC waves observed at the near-conjugate stations of Great Whale River and Byrd. The solid and dotted arrows represent signals observed at these two stations respectively. Lower panel: Amplitude records of the wave structure illustrating the 180 phase shift between hemispheres (after Saito, 1969).

  9. CRRES Observations • EMIC waves at 2-3Hz seen at L=4.5-5.5 and MLAT=27o off the equator (no fine structure) • Propagated from the equatorial region • Occurs in the trough region and runs into the plasmapause fHe+ Plasmapause

  10. Azimuth Ellipticity BH CRRES Observations • EMIC event frequency 0.3-1.5Hz at L=5.3 and MLAT=0.5o • Propagation in the plasmasphere with density Ne=100cm-3 • Harmonic structure with fundamental below fHe+ and three harmonics above • Propagation in a density slot where Ne reduces from 100cm-3 to ~70cm-3 minimum in the duct • Width of duct is ~0.16Re, (N + ½) waves

  11. 3. EMIC Waves and Radial Plasma Structures G8 G10 18:20-20:00UT G8 21:00-24:00UT G10 21:35-22:20UT G8 Maps from: Spasojevic et al. (2003) Full plasmasphere EMIC in Plume EMIC at Plume edge? Radial Plumes (Fraser et al., 2005)

  12. EMIC Waves appearing in Plumes 9 June 2001 G10 1.0 Hn Frequency 0 21 24UT 12 15LT 10 June 2001 G8 G8 1.0 1.0 Hn Hn Frequency 0 0 18 22UT 21:30 22:30UT 13 17LT 16:30 17:30LT • GOES can only see waves • with frequencies <1Hz. • EMIC waves identified through • wave analysis. • Typically similar to IPDP and Pc1-2 • Unstructured pulsations seen in the • Outer magnetosphere and on the • Ground at high latitudes • (Anderson et al 1996; Menk et al 1992)

  13. 23 May 2001 IMAGE FUV-EUV Detached Proton Arc; Plasma Plume FUV sees arcs 1901-2327UT (T. Immel) GOES-8 Footprint (T89 Kp=3) EUV plasmasphere (J. Goldstein) GOES EMIC waves

  14. GOES-8 EMIC Waves 23 May 2001 Note He+ slot 1.0 Hn Hz 0 2210 2310UT

  15. GOES-8 Spectral Analysis: 23 May 2001 2210-2310UT He-Hn He Pwr Pwr 1.0 Coherence Hn 0 Pwr LH 0 RH Crossphase 0 1.0 1.0 0 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)

  16. GOES – LANL (MPA) – IMAGE (EUV) 23 -24 May 2001 EUV EUV

  17. 4. Ring Current – Plasmapause Interaction for EMICW Plasmasphere-ring current interaction at the plasmapause L = 4 - 5 (Summers et al., JGR, 1998) (Kawamura et al., Mem., NIPR, 1982) 17 April, 2002 (Goldstein et al., JGR, 2005)

  18. Occurrence of EMIC Waves at CRRES: 14 months 1990-1991 Reasonably even distribution with L over X<0.25 Normalised wave frequency - L L = 0 is the plasmapause. L < 0 waves in the plasmasphere L > 0 waves outside the plasmasphere, in the plasma trough. 

  19. 3. Occurrence of EMIC Waves at CRRES: 14 months 1990-1991 More waves occurring outside the Plasmapause below fHe+ Normalised wave frequency - L fHe+ L = 0 is the plasmapause. L < 0 waves in the plasmasphere L > 0 waves outside the plasmasphere, in the plasma trough. 

  20. Plasma “Cavity”- Plasmapause-Plasma Trough A B C D

  21. Plasmasphere-Plasmapause-Plasma Plumes 18 D C Geostationary orbit (GOES, LANL) GTO orbit (CRRES) B 4 L=7 12 A 06

  22. 6. Plasmaspheric Plumes and EMIC Waves Following a Storm CRRES 9 September, 1991 • Orbits separated by ~10hr • Orbits at same MLT’s • SSC occurred at end • of orbit 990 • Orbits 991-992 in • recovery phase • Plume evolution and • EMIC wave association • EMIC at steep • gradients/edges? EMIC (Density from Moldwin et al., 2003)

  23. CRRES Orbit 991 9 September 1991 IMF Bz ~ –5nT

  24. CRRES Orbit 992 9-10 September 1991 IMF Bz ~ –10nT

  25. 6. Ring Current – Plasmasphere Interaction for EMICW Radial plasmasphere-ring current interaction at the plasmapause (Kawamura et al., Mem., NIPR, 1982) Azimuthal plasmasphere-ring current interaction with plumes HENA 10-60keV protons 17 April, 2002 (Goldstein et al., JGR, 2005)

  26. EMIC Waves and Plasma Gradients 18 Azimuthal Gradient Convection Radial Gradient 12 L=7 Corotation 06

  27. 5. Statistics: Plasma Conditions for Plumes CRRES - Normalised frequency – PWE e- density  CRRES - Frequency – MLT

  28. Occurrence of EMIC Waves at CRRES: 14 months 1990-1991 More waves seen 14-18 MLT and L > 4 8 4 (Meredith et al., JGR, 2003)

  29. CRRES Statistics - 1 Normalised frequency - L Normalised frequency - MLAT Ellipticity - MLAT Normalised frequency – e- density RH LH Normalised wave frequency - L L = 0 is the plasmapause. L < 0 waves in the plasmasphere L > 0 waves outside the plasmasphere, in the plasma trough. 

  30. CRRES Statistics - 2 • Scatter plot of CRRES EMIC wave event local magnetic field magnitude against plasma density. • Overlaid are contourplots of maximum convective growth rate for a pureproton plasma in the N–B plane generated by Anderson et al. JGR,(1992). He+ Scatter plot of the wave transverse spectral power densityversus ΔL = Le − Lpp where Le and Lpp are the L valuescorrespondingto the position of the wave occurrence and that of theplasmapause, respectively. O+ Scatter plot of the wave frequency versus local total magnetic field magnitude.

  31. Summary • EMIC waves occur more often in the plasma trough than the plasmasphere/plasmapause • They preferentially occur in association with the higher density regions • The high density regions may be radially structured plumes (or a full plasma trough) • A gradient interface boundary between the ring current and the cold/cool plasma may be necessary to create instability. This may be: • A radial boundary in the trough produced by plumes, or • An azimuthal boundary provided by the plasmapause • There may be a threshold density for instability, in the range 10-100 cm-3. (Role of plasma ß?) • NOTE: Identification of the plasmapause may depend on particle species(e-, H+, He+, O+)

  32. What Needs to be Done? • Robust EMIC wave statistics taking into consideration Solar Wind & IMF conditions, and Dst, Kp, AE etc. • Undertake similar E-field EMIC wave analysis. Will see EMIC at low L. Not possible with B field due to steep gradient at low L. • Individual storm event studies for comparison with modellers. Do for both RC and RB. (New GOES data Available) • What else does the RB community want from the CRRES dataset? Important Unresolved Issues • Are EMIC waves seen during the main phase • Role of Magnetosonic waves (first few harmonics only) • As yet to be defined…………

More Related