1 / 13

You & The Distant Future

You & The Distant Future. Robin Hanson Assoc. Prof. of Economics George Mason University. Outline. Near-Far Theory – why your thoughts on future are odd. Perpetuities – How you could have huge impact, but the law fights you.

ide
Download Presentation

You & The Distant Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. You & The Distant Future Robin Hanson Assoc. Prof. of Economics George Mason University

  2. Outline • Near-Far Theory – why your thoughts on future are odd. • Perpetuities – How you could have huge impact, but the law fights you. • Cryonics – How you might personally live to see the future, yet few are interested.

  3. Outline • Near-Far Theory – why your thoughts on future are odd. • Perpetuities – How you could have huge impact, but the law fights you. • Cryonics – How you might personally live to see the future, yet few are interested.

  4. The Future Seems Shiny

  5. FAR: many things, each less detailed Assume: far in time, social distance, chance, & care Objects: few distinct types, simple, smooth, blue People: few distinct types, act on coherent core values Theories: strong, few deviations, confident Assume: near in time, social distance, chance, & care Objects: many mixed types, complex, textured, red People: many mixed types, act on conflicted desires Theories: weak, many deviations, uncertain NEAR: few things, each more detailed

  6. FAR Construal Level Theory • Near: few, detailed • Far: many, minimal • Categorize, analogize • See Liberman & Trope Science 21Nov ‘08 • “Abstract/concrete”; distinct brain hardware? • Near: more for practical hidden decisions • Far: more to impress, & to decide: • Talk, lead, control, moral/norm NEAR

  7. Near Far here, now, me, us;important; past; warm, red; bright, taste, touch; slang, grunt; voice, picture; fear, sad; disliked, low mood; sex, tempt; persuadable, seek info, conforming, support authority; low power/status, via acts;math/logic analysis, case-based comparable how con reasons;uncertain, theory/trend-breaking, common likely real local events;concrete, context-dependent, detailed, incidental relations;narrow categories; familiar task/event;feasible safe acts; money, buying; conflicted secondary local practical constraints, means;strong, female emotions; socially near folks w/ unstable traits in small groups there, then, them; unimportant, future; cold, blue; dark,see, hear; polite speech, words, faces; anger, guilt, shame, pride, anxiety, regret; liked, high mood; love, self-control;stubborn, trust, support underdogs; high power/status, via associates; creative analogy, feature-based unique why pro reasons;over-confident; theory/trend-following, rare unlikely unreal global events;abstract, schematic, context-free, core, coarse, goal-related properties; broad categories; novel task/event;desirable risky acts; selling, satisfaction; coherent central global symbolic ideal moral concerns, ends, obstacles;weak, male emotions; far folks w/ stable traits in big groups

  8. The Future Seems Shiny

  9. Outline • Near-Far Theory – why your thoughts on future are odd. • Perpetuities – How you could have huge impact, but the law fights you. • Cryonics – How you might personally live to see the future, yet few are interested.

  10. Ben Franklin’s 200 year gift • Most famous of US, Poor Richard’s Almanac • 1785 French satire mocked US optimism: “Fortunate Richard” will left $ to pay in 500yr • Franklin left £1000 ea. to Philly, Boston Died 1790, funds grew, in 1990 paid 2.3,5M$, x 35, 76 inflation-adjusted gains 1.8, 2.2%/yr return, below market rates

  11. A Copycat Wannabe • Peter Thellusson, 1797, left £600K in will: • “to be invested until every currently existing heir was dead, then give to distant descendants” • Burned in legal fees: 62 years, 100s lawyers • Parliament enacted: Rule against perpetuities • Jonathan Holden, 1967, $2.8M to 500yr trusts • More high-minded purposes • ’77 court: Must pay yearly, not accumulate

  12. Magic of Compound Interest • 1.023100 = 10, 1.05500 = 4x109, 1.055000 = 10105 ! • Wealth buildups long a tempting target • E.g., Jewish Jubilee institutionalized grab • But England property secure since 1200 • Risk there was kids refuse to save • Law prevents trusts instructed to save! • Distaste for “dead hands” control living • Discourages trade of helping future for ancestor respect/remember

  13. Outline • Near-Far Theory – why your thoughts on future are odd. • Perpetuities – How you could have huge impact, but the law fights you. • Cryonics – How you might personally live to see the future, yet few are interested.

More Related