Discussion on . Against Idiosynchrasy in Ontology Development by Barry Smith. …and responses from Matthew West. Background. The “possible individuals”. Barry Smith Julian Park Distinguished Professor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy at the University at Buffalo
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Against Idiosynchrasy in Ontology Development by Barry Smith
…and responses from Matthew West
The “possible individuals”
What is all the fuss about?
Example: ISO 15926-2 definition for namespace
A namespace is a class_of_arrangement_of_individualwhere the class_of_wholeand class_of_partare members of class_of_information_representationand the part is the most significant part of the whole that is the namespace.
Source: ISO 15926-2
What makes an Ontology an Upper Ontology?
Barry Smith’s Principals
Response to Against Idiosyncrasy in Ontology Development
Why ISO 15926 is NOT an Upper Ontology
According to Smith, ISO 15926 is more like a coding scheme such as the Standard Algebraic Notation for Chess…which is not an ontology of chess.