1 / 17

Presentation Inception report GHS: Comprehensibility and Notification Consumer Study

Presentation Inception report GHS: Comprehensibility and Notification Consumer Study. Dr. Sirach Lapyai Rangsit University. 1. GHS: Attitude, Comprehensibility and Notification Consumer Study in Thailand. Topics to be discussed: Testing modules Inception report: result

hyunshik
Download Presentation

Presentation Inception report GHS: Comprehensibility and Notification Consumer Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation Inception reportGHS: Comprehensibility and Notification Consumer Study Dr. Sirach Lapyai Rangsit University 1

  2. GHS: Attitude, Comprehensibility and NotificationConsumer Study in Thailand Topics to be discussed: • Testing modules • Inception report: result • Next phase of testing 2

  3. Testing modules: 9 approaches • Module 1: demographic profile and SES ‘who are our targets’? • Module 2: psychographic data • Module 3:consumer knowledge and storage of knowledge ‘what do they have in mind’? • Module 4: consumer’s sources of information and trust‘through which channel?’ 3

  4. continue • Module 5:consumer understanding and perception/ pictogram testing ‘how do they interpret and accept new labelling system if exists’? • Module 6/7: comprehensibility and risk ‘how do they evaluate risk?’ • Module 8/9: media sources‘finding the best-practice of communication’ 4

  5. In conclusion: what do we expect from CT 5

  6. Inception report: what do we know now about Thai consumer: young adult Tentative detail • First testing after a pilot test in February • Population selected: young adult group • Sampling size: 80 • Accumulated SES: university-based student group 6

  7. continue • Age ranging from 19-24 • Gender: mixed • Academic year: mixed • Geographic: mostly BKK-based • SES: middle to upper middle+ • Chemical active users: daily use, personal use, household use 7

  8. Previous knowledge • Mythical beliefs concerning chemical use, storage, first-aid and precaution Example:household chemicals are ‘safe’ because they are sold to be use in household/ domestic cleanliness must be achieved by using ‘harsh’ chemical • Basic knowledge but lack sophisticated knowledge 8

  9. continue • Most respondents seldom read labels • Knowledge on chemical and health hazard is limited • Conscience in self-guarding/ effects on environment is limited • Direct source of information is from mass media esp. advertisement 9

  10. continue • Source of trust: national news, WHO, Public Health Ministry, parents • Most respondents agree they still lack information on chemical safety use and agree advertisements are half-truth • Public educationis needed 10

  11. On GHS Comprehensibility: inception report • Most respondents agree if new system of labelling, if better in providing effective information,replace the previous system • Most respondents need to see ‘easy-to-understand’’ label • English language and scientific names are barrier to understanding 11

  12. continue • Most respondents believe reading label is not important On pictograms: • Most respondents are able to identify and interpret ‘Flammable’pictogram and ‘Skull and crossbones’ • They agree ‘compressed gas’ is confusing 12

  13. continue • ‘compressed gas’ is interpreted as a bottle, hypodermic needle, a ‘do not slide’ sign • ‘exclamation mark’ means stop • Most respondentscannot interpret ‘health hazard’ and ‘environment’ pictogram 13

  14. continue Pictogram danger rating • Flammable • Skull and crossbones • Explosive Not ‘dangerous’ • Exclamation mark • Gas cylinder • Health hazard 14

  15. continue If pictograms need to identify ‘warning’ and ‘danger’, they must be: • Need to be in big letter • Bold letter • Use red colour • Placed in front of the label • Pictogram must be easy to understand and need Thai language underneath 15

  16. continue • Responsible person must be from the government sector • They need public campaign • More information is needed through most media including via internet • Education since elementary school age is needed 14

  17. End of report Thank you Dr. Sirach Lapyai 17

More Related