1 / 26

SHRP 2 Reliability Project L38

SHRP 2 Reliability Project L38. October 29, 2014. L02: Suggestions for PPT. L38 Pilots,

hyacinth-battle
Download Presentation

SHRP 2 Reliability Project L38

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SHRP 2 Reliability Project L38 October 29, 2014

  2. L02: Suggestions for PPT L38 Pilots, We would like your slides to be as visual , graphical, and data oriented as possible. Items that are ordinarily bullet points will be captured live in the on-screen note taking so please plan to discuss these bullet points versus displaying them visually. We’ve prepared a sample from FL for L02 . And prepared individual slides for the other products.

  3. L02: 1) Were you able to identify contributing factors of unreliability? Explain (any graphs can be added to the ppt showing your test cases and results) 2) Were you able to validate your findings

  4. L02 L02: 3) Explain the Barriers or challenges to using the L02 Guide • Category overlapping:

  5. L02: 4) Usefulness/Value of the L02 Guide ** Will answer this question without a visual

  6. L02: 5) Suggested Guide refinements

  7. L02: 6) Other Comments ** Please skip Florida on this question

  8. L07: 1) Use of tool a. Ease of GUI b. Data input 2) Explain your test case (this is probably best suited for the power point)

  9. L07: 3) Were you able to validate/calibrate your findings

  10. L07: 4) Usefulness/Value of tool: Has the tool provide useful/meaningful results yet?

  11. L07: 5) Suggested tool refinements

  12. L07: 6) Other comments

  13. L08: 1) Use of tools and the ease of inputting data (FREEVAL, STREETVAL)2) Explain your test case ( this is probably best suited for the power point)3) Were you able to validate your findings

  14. L08: 4) Usefulness/Value of tool: Have the tools provide useful/meaningful results yet?

  15. L08: 5) Suggested refinements

  16. L08: 6) Other comments

  17. C11: 1) Use of tool: • How did the data input and output functions work? • What did you need to customize? • Explain your test case and results. • Were you able to validate your findings?

  18. C11: 4) Was the economic impact forecast reasonable? Was it sensitive to operational changes?

  19. C11: 5) Usefulness of tool: Did the tool provide useful/meaningful results?

  20. C11: 6) Suggested Guide Refinements

  21. C11: 7) Other comments

  22. L05: 1) Was the guide helpful in improving programmatic, planning, or project selection processes? 2) For what purposes will your agency utilize the L05 Guide?

  23. L05: 3) Explain the Barriers or challenges to using the guide. 4) Does the technical document provide adequate detail?

  24. L05: 5) Explain the Usefulness/Value of L05 Guide

  25. L05: 6) Suggested refinements

  26. L05: 6) Other comments

More Related