1 / 11

presented by Paul C ruikshank

Review of the cryogenic by-pass for the LHC DS Collimators Vacuum Design May 26, 2011. presented by Paul C ruikshank with input and contributions from: V . Baglin, N . Provot, W. Maan TE/VSC, and the team working on the DS collimator project. Recall: R ules of the game.

hume
Download Presentation

presented by Paul C ruikshank

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Review of the cryogenic by-pass for the LHC DS Collimators Vacuum Design May 26, 2011 presented by Paul Cruikshank with input and contributions from: V. Baglin, N. Provot, W. Maan TE/VSC, and the team working on the DS collimator project

  2. Recall: Rules of the game... • No halogenated fluxes to be used anywhere • Vacuum brazing only • No ‘helium-to-beam vacuum’ welds (or brazes) • Partial penetration welds only • No demountable vacuum tight joints in cryogenic system • No ‘metal/ceramic’ vacuum tight joints in cryogenic system • Vessel walls with material lamination (inclusions) parallel to wall surface, otherwise forged material. • Minimise the number of thin-wall components • Favour flexible pipe loops to braided hoses • All components and subassemblies to be leak tested before installation • Combined pressure & leak test of finished assemblies  tooling • Thermal cycle of cryo assembles is strongly recommended

  3. Design Principles • General • To minimise the work and reduce risks use validated designs – beam screens, PIMs, cold-to-warm transitions, cryostat construction, vacuum instrumentation. • Beam vacuum • Separation of cold and warm sectors with sector valves • Room temperature system is bakeable and equipped with permanent bakeout heaters (integration & radiation issue). • Removal of collimator without warm-up of arc • RF ball interface to validate PIM status in arcs 2-3 and 3-4 • Each cold volume has adequate pressure relief • Insulation vacuum • Integrate the collimator cryostat into the existing vacuum subsector • Each subsector has adequate pressure relief

  4. Beam vacuum sectorisationeg IR3L RT vacuum sector Cold vacuum sector Q7L to Q7R • New beam vacuum sectors are created – cold & room temp • 16 additional sector valves in IR3L & R Before After

  5. Beam vacuum sectors • New RT vacuum sectors are instrumented as LSS zones • New cold vacuum sectors will have at least one rupture disc as part of the arc beam vacuum consolidation in LS1

  6. Beam vacuum – sector valve constraint • Actuator of the sector valve must be removed to fully open W sleeve on the right • Sector valve remains locked closed by design • The arc is always at RT for the intervention • The leak tightness can be monitored • In case of problem, the collimator could be re-baked in the shadow of the arc cool down • Actuator demounting has been validated

  7. RF Ball implementation • RF ball test in LHC baseline to verify PIM integrity after warm-up • Existing interfaces at arc extremities • Ball cannot travel thro’ DS collimators (too large cross-section, vacuum integrity, sector valves closed) • New interface at QTC – DN35 flange on ‘cold side’ – also used for vacuum gauges. • PIMs will all be consolidated in Q11 to Q7 zone - only need to perform RF ball on arc side

  8. Vacuum system assembly • Vacuum component preparation • Shopping list is complete • Validation of detail drgs by end June – then manufacturing of first beam screens in main workshop - to be delivered 31st October 2011. • QTC and Connection Cryostat preparation • Beam screen, cold-to-warm transition and PIM integration very similar to arc SSS and diploes • Beam screen integration work will be combined with other SSS and dipole preparation at a single site – SMI2? • fragile components, single team ,single assembly zone, centralisation of tooling • Collimator & other RT components • ‘Lego’ components will be prepared as for LHC in building 113 and 252 • Some pre-mounting of RT components on the QTC (eg sector valves) is under discussion

  9. Insulation vacuum issues • Adequate cross-section for pumping through by-pass cryostat 0.18 m2 ~ C 3000 l/s • MCI pressure relief configuration to confirm for subsector • Existing equi-spaced pumping ports for additional mobile pumps if required at Q11, Q9 and Q7 • Radiation exposure of fixed pumping group at Q8 • exposure of equipment during operation & personnel during routine maintenance • move to Q9 - to discuss • Standard in-tunnel leak testing works • Machine interconnects • Jumper inetrconnects • New cryo-extension (Q9, Q7 and DFBA)

  10. Operational considerations • Risks for operation start-up • Significant modification to LHC vacuum systems at IR3 • A lot of new vacuum hardware to be installed and tested • New cabling and revised controls software  Time must be reserved for system tests • Risks for operation • More hardware in the tunnel – reliability & maintenance • Collimators are very near to cold arcs - particle showers from the collimators may produce vacuum instabilities (eg heat loads to beam screens) resulting in sector valve closures • The beam vacuum design been made to mitigate against instabilities • Similar configurations already exist eg near Q4 • Clone of the existing LHC vacuum design • Conditioning of the collimators prior to installation & in-situ bakeout • Adequate pumping speed from ion pumps & NEG • Beam screens in QTC to provide vacuum stability and adequate pumping  No major operation concerns

  11. Thank you for your attention!

More Related