Kid writing program evaluation psdc conference 2006
Download
1 / 40

Kid Writing Program Evaluation PSDC Conference 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 78 Views
  • Uploaded on

“Kid Writing Program Evaluation” PSDC Conference 2006. Mifflin County School District In collaboration with the Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11. Project Inception. Requested by Mifflin County District Office Administration

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Kid Writing Program Evaluation PSDC Conference 2006' - hubert


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Kid writing program evaluation psdc conference 2006 l.jpg

“Kid Writing Program Evaluation” PSDC Conference 2006

Mifflin County School District

In collaboration with the

Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11


Project inception l.jpg
Project Inception

  • Requested by Mifflin County District Office Administration

  • Specifically, Mr. Runk and Dr. Czerniakowski expressed interest in the development of an IU Program Evaluation Model during the summer administrative retreat, 2004.


Program background l.jpg
Program Background

  • In late August, Dr. Czerniakowski met with Dr.Tracy Hinish from the TIU office to develop the timeline for implementation. At that time, Highland Park Elementary, because of its size and diversity, was identified as the school for the study. It was determined that “Kid Writing” should be the topic of discussion.


Planning meeting l.jpg
Planning Meeting

  • On October 20, 2004, an initial planning meeting of the core team members was held at Highland Park Elementary.

  • Goals for the project were determined.

  • Questions for exploration were listed.


Core team members l.jpg
Core Team Members

  • Dr. John Czerniakowski

  • Dr. Joe Maginnis

  • Dr. Linda Mohler

  • Robert Shinskie

  • Deb Coble

  • Amber Elsesser

  • Sharon Grassmyer

  • Dottie Peiffer

  • Rita Weber

  • Beth White

  • Tracy Hinish


Additional members during 05 06 l.jpg
Additional Members during 05-06

  • Kristin Fisher, first grade teacher who replaced Sharon Grassmyer

  • Dr. Ken Albaugh, consultant for TIU 11


Questions for exploration l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • How has Kid Writing affected older students?


Questions for exploration8 l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • What grade

    specific guidelines/

    benchmarks could serve as expectations?


Questions for exploration9 l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • How should writing prompts for PSSA preparation be incorporated with Kid Writing?


Questions for exploration10 l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • What role do literacy coaches play in Kid Writing?


Questions for exploration11 l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • How should we report progress for Kid Writing?


Questions for exploration12 l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • What reading benefits do students gain as a result of Kid Writing?


Questions for exploration13 l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • How are other districts using Kid Writing?


Questions for exploration14 l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • What are reasonable daily time expectations for Kid Writing?


Questions for exploration15 l.jpg
Questions for Exploration

  • How has students’ writing skills and reading abilities improved as a result of Kid Writing?


Data collected l.jpg
Data Collected

  • Longitudinal PSSA data

  • Imagination Station

  • DIBELS


Data collected17 l.jpg
Data Collected

  • Teacher perceptions as per team interview on March 22, 2005

  • Student artifacts/portfolios


Title i reading literacy coaches l.jpg
Title I Reading/Literacy Coaches

  • In December 2005, Title I Reading/Literacy Coaches were invited to participate.

    • Cynthia Smith

    • Jennifer Knode


Perceptions data summary l.jpg
Perceptions Data Summary

  • Reading impact

    • Many kindergarten children are reading by the end of K and most identify words.

    • Enjoy writing and reading

    • K – Guided Reading Level D

    • More connectedness between reading, writing, speaking, listening


Reading impact l.jpg
Reading Impact

  • Easier transfers of author’s purpose to writing (using all caps for loud speaking)

  • Confidence with writing

  • Clear applications to notes, letters, cards, notes to each other

  • Smoother grade level transition from kindergarten to second grade


Perceptions data summary21 l.jpg
Perceptions Data Summary

  • Challenges

    • Helpers/parents volunteers are necessary for kindergarten classes. It would be helpful in other grades as well.

    • It is beneficial for the literacy coaches to be involved. This helps a lot.

    • Children with speech difficulties have trouble hearing initial sounds.

    • Children who have not had exposure to print or writing implements have extreme difficulty.


Perceptions data summary22 l.jpg
Perceptions Data Summary

  • Curriculum Challenges:

    • All grade level curriculum is more rigorous as a result of Kid Writing.

    • There are more opportunities for extended activities at all grade levels due to higher level of sophistication.


Additional challenges l.jpg
Additional Challenges

  • Children who move into the district and have had no Kid Writing experience have difficulty.

  • Getting students to write to a more sophisticated level of detail presents challenges.

  • First year of implementation presented uncertainties for the teachers.


Perceptions data summary24 l.jpg
Perceptions Data Summary

  • Second Grade – more rigor in spelling.

  • “Maintenance” issues for first grade are already covered.


Perceptions data summary25 l.jpg
Perceptions Data Summary

  • Grading Issues:

    • Portfolios

    • Rubrics

    • Developmental Checklists


General classroom observations l.jpg
General Classroom Observations

  • Helpers beneficial in all grade levels

  • Literacy coaches beneficial in all grades

  • Complete student engagement

  • One to one teacher/student contact

  • Peer tutors

  • Routines established

  • Learning centers/stations and other activities are required for classroom management issues once students finish assignments


Classroom observations l.jpg
Classroom Observations

  • Student enthusiasm

  • Text rich environment

  • Positive interactions

  • Vocabulary development

  • Peer models

  • Use of resources for writing

  • Problem solving – “What do you do when you get to a word you don’t know how to spell?


Classroom observations28 l.jpg
Classroom Observations

  • Handwriting integrated

  • Co-teaching with Title I Reading/Literacy Coaches

  • Get to every child, every day

  • Portfolios allow to see growth

  • Better parent communication

  • Applications of decoding skills

  • Individuality


Portfolio observations l.jpg
Portfolio Observations

  • Teacher/adult editing

  • Interest surveys completed with parents

  • Word lists

  • Student writing

  • Evidence of the use of conventions as students progressed through the grade levels

  • Expanded vocabulary


Portfolio observations30 l.jpg
Portfolio Observations

  • Combination of fiction and non-fiction writings

  • Evidence of mapping and Venn Diagrams


2005 06 school year l.jpg
2005-06 School Year

  • Developed guidelines and benchmarks for Kid Writing at Kindergarten, first, and second grade

    • Benchmarks for beginning, middle, and end of school year by grade level. Includes skills and expectations for average achievement.

    • Guidelines include classroom management tips and student writing samples for K, 1st, and 2nd grades

  • Comparison of third grade PSSA data with control group and experimental group


2005 06 school year continued l.jpg
2005-06 School Year continued

Networking of TIU member districts who are using Kid Writing

  • Continued Professional Development

    • District visits

    • Writer’s workshop


Pssa reading data collection tool l.jpg
PSSA Reading Data Collection Tool

PSSA Performance - Reading


Pssa reading data collection tool34 l.jpg
PSSA Reading Data Collection Tool


Pssa reading data collection tool35 l.jpg
PSSA Reading Data Collection Tool


Pssa math data collection tool l.jpg
PSSA MathData Collection Tool

PSSA Performance - Math


Pssa math data collection tool37 l.jpg
PSSA MathData Collection Tool


Pssa math data collection tool38 l.jpg
PSSA Math Data Collection Tool


Questions l.jpg
Questions?

  • Comments


Contact information l.jpg
Contact Information

  • Dr. John Czneriakowski, Assistant Superintendent, Mifflin County SD

  • jjc31@mcsdk12.org

  • Dr. Tracy Hinish, Assistant Executive Director, Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11

  • thinish@tiu11.org

  • Dr. Joe Maginnis, Principal,Highland Park Elementary, Mifflin County SD

  • jpm45@mcsdk12.org


ad