1 / 14

Danuta A. Nitecki, Dean of Libraries, Drexel University April 26, 2013

EIGHT. T angible I nsights P reparing S cholarship. Danuta A. Nitecki, Dean of Libraries, Drexel University April 26, 2013 Concordia Professional Forum Montreal. #1 Problem statement: grab and keep the reader. Lead-in Originality Direction Value.

howe
Download Presentation

Danuta A. Nitecki, Dean of Libraries, Drexel University April 26, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EIGHT TangibleInsightsPreparingScholarship Danuta A. Nitecki, Dean of Libraries, Drexel University April 26, 2013 Concordia Professional Forum Montreal

  2. #1 Problem statement: grab and keep the reader • Lead-in • Originality • Direction • Value

  3. #2 Literature Review:synthesize and “mind the gap” Literature Review Theoretical Framework

  4. #3 Logical Structure:see where you are going Visual diagram of problem direction Study objectives • Research Questions • Hypotheses

  5. Identify barriers to publishing research among academic librarians.

  6. Study Objectives

  7. #4 Research Design: how to conduct the research • Who [population/sample/size] • Where • When

  8. #5 #5 Methodolay#5 Methodology: match protocol to the problem • Qualitative • Quantitative

  9. #6Data Quality:clarify limitations • Reliability: • Extent data are consistent • Validity: extent findings are: • generalizable to population [external validity], or • accurately measure [internal validity]

  10. #7 Manage: research project like a pro • Costs and resources • Time and timing • People and protections [IRB]

  11. #8 Presentation: lay out your contribution • Findings • Discussion • Conclusions

  12. Preparing Research for Publication • Problem statement • Literature Review • [Logical Structure] • Research Design • Methodology • Data Quality • [Manage to conduct study] • Presentation

  13. Publication structure

  14. Thank you for your attention Danuta A. Nitecki: dan44@drexel.edu Peter Hernon, Robert E. Dugan, and Danuta A. Nitecki. Engaging in Evaluation and Assessment Research. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, 2011.

More Related